Bibliographie

  1. ADAM P. [1997], ’Mobility of married Women’, Working Paper, INRA, MERIT.
  2. AGRESTI A. [1990], Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  3. ALBACH H. et MACDONALD G. M. [1989], ’Innovationsstrategien zur Verbesserung der Wettbewerbsfahigkeit’, Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft, vol.59, n°12, december, pp.1338-1352.
  4. AMENDOLA M. et GAFFARD J- L. [1988], La Dynamique Economique de l’Innovation, Economica, Paris
  5. ANDERSEN E. B. [1997], Introduction to the Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New-York
  6. ANDERSON M. et HOLMES J. [1995], ’High-sill, Low-wage Manufacturing in North America: A case study from the automotive parts industry’, Regional Studies, vol.27, n°7, pp.655-671
  7. ANTONELLI C. [1995], The economics of localized technological change and industrial dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
  8. ARCHIBUGI D., EVANGELISTA R. et SIMONETTI R. [1994], ’On the Definition and Measurment of Product and Process Innovations’, in Innovation in Technology, Industries, and Institutions. Studies in Schumperian Perspectives ed. by Shionoya Y. et Perlman M., The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp.7-26
  9. ARTHUR B. W., ERMOLIEV Y. M. et KANIOVSKI Y. M. [1987], ’Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.30, n°3, june, pp.294-303.
  10. ATHEY S. et SCHMUTZLER A. [1995], ’Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.26, n° 4, winter, pp.557-574.
  11. BALDWIN J. R., HANEL P. et SABOURIN D. [1998], Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firms : The role of intellectual property rights, Communication au TSER Network on Innovation and Economic Change, Delft, 12-13 February, 1999.
  12. BELLET M. et LALLICH S. [1999], ’Externalites, modele input-output et economie de l’innovation: Quelques enseignements’, Economie Appliquée, vol.52, n°4, pp.7-33.
  13. BERCHTOLD A. [1994], ’Modélisation autoregressive des chaînes de Markov d’ordre L’, Cahiers du département d’Econométrie, n°94.07, Université de Genève.
  14. BERCHTOLD A. [1996], ’Modélisation autoregressive des chaînes de Markov : Utilisation d’une matrice différente pour chaque retard’, Revue de Statistique Appliquée, vol.XLIV, n°3, pp.5-25.
  15. BERCHTOLD A. [1998], Chaînes de Markov et modèles de transition : Application aux sciences sociales, Editions HERMES, Paris
  16. BERCHTOLD A. [1999], GMTD 1.0 Mixture Transition Distribution (MTD). Modeling of High-Order Markov Chains. User’s guide, University of Geneva, URL:
  17. BERCHTOLD A. et RITSCHARD G. [1997], ’Stabilité de l’estimation d’une distribution de probabilité’, Recueil des résumés des communications des 29em journées de Statistiques, pp.139-141, ASU, IUT STID Domaine d’Auriac, Carcassonne, France
  18. BERGERON S., LALLICH S. et LE BAS C. [1998], ’Location of innovating activities, industrial structure and techno-industrial clusters in the French economy, 1985-1990. Evidence from US patenting’, Research Policy, 26, pp.733-751.
  19. BERTSCHEK I. [1995], ’Product and Process Innovations as a Response to Increasing Import Foreign Direct Investment’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.43, n°4, decembre, pp.341-57.
  20. BIEMANS W. G. [1995], ’Internal and external networks in product development : a case for integration’, in Product Development. Meeting the challenge of the Design-Marketing Interface, ed. by Bruce M. and Biemans W. G., John Wiley & sons, pp.137-160.
  21. BONANNO G. et HAWORTH B. [1998], ’Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, pp.495-510.
  22. BOUDON R. [1970], L’Analyse Mathématique des Faits Sociaux, Plon, Paris, deuxième édition
  23. BOUDON R. [1973], Mathematical Structure of Social Mobility, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
  24. BREADSLEY G. et MANSFIELD E. [1978], ’A note on the accuracy of industrial forecasts of the profitability of new products and processes’, in Journal of Business, vol.51, n°1, pp.127-135.
  25. BRUCE M. et BIEMANS W. G. [1995], Product Development. Meeting the challenge of the Design-Marketing Interface, John Wiley Sons, U.K.
  26. CABAGNOLS A. [1999], Conditions Micro-économiques d’Appropriation et Continuité des Comportements Innovateurs de Produit et de Procédé : Une analyse empirique sur données individuelles françaises, communication préparée pour les Journées de l’AFSE Economie de l’Innovation’, Nice Sophia Antipolis, 21-22 Mai.
  27. CABALLERO R. J. et HAMMOUR M. L. [1996], ’On the Timing and Efficiency of Creative Destruction’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.111, n°3, August, pp.805-852.
  28. CANTNER U. et HANUSCH H. [1993], ’Process and Product Innovations in an International Trade Context’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.2, n°3, pp.217-36.
  29. CAPON N., FARLEY J. U., LEHMANN D. R. et HULBERT J. M. [1992], ’Profiles of product innovators among large U.S. manufacturers’, Management Science, vol.38, n°2, pp.157-169.
  30. CEFIS E. [1996], Is there anay persistence in innovative activity ?, Document de travail, Department of Economics, University of Trento, n°6
  31. CEFIS E. [1999], ’Persistence in profitability and in innovative activities’, Communication lors du European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, 7-9 june 1999, Grenoble, France.
  32. CLARK K. B. et WHEELWRIGHT S. [1993], Managing New Product and Process Development. Text and Cases, The Free Press, New York.
  33. COHEN W. M. [1995], ’Empirical studies of innovative activity’, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, ed. by Stoneman P., Basil Blackwell, pp.182-264.
  34. COHEN W. M. et KLEPPER S. [1996]a, ’A reprise of size and R&D’, The Economic Journal, vol.106, july, pp.925-951.
  35. COHEN W. M. et KLEPPER S. [1996]b, ’Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries : the case of process and product R&D’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. LXXVII, may, n°2, pp.232-243.
  36. COHEN W. M. et LEVIN R. C. [1989], ’Empirical studies of innovation and market structure’, in Handbook of industrial organization, vol.II, ed. by Schmalensee R. and Willig R.D., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp.1059-1107.
  37. COHEN W. M. et LEVINTHAL D. A. [1989], ’Innovation and learning : The two faces of R&D’, The Economic Journal, vol.99, september, pp.569-596.
  38. COHEN W. M. et LEVINTHAL D. A. [1990], ’Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, pp.128-152.
  39. COHENDET P. et LLERENA P. [1989], ’Flexibilités, risque et incertitude dans la théorie de la firme : un survey’, in Flexibilité information et décision ed. by Cohendet P. et Llerena P., Economica, Paris, pp.7-71.
  40. COHENDET P. et LLERENA P. [1999], ’La conception de la firme comme processeur de connaissances’, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, n°88, pp.211-225.
  41. CONLISK J. [1996], ’Why Bounded Rationality’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.XXXIV, June, pp.669-700.
  42. DAVID P. A. et FORAY D. [1995], ’Dépendance du sentier et économie de l’innovation : un rapide tour d’horizon’, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, Hors Série, pp.27-53.
  43. DAWID H. [1996], Adaptative Learning by Genetic Algorithms : Analytical Results and Applications to Economic Models, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New-York
  44. DAY R. H. [1995]a, ’L’existence hors de l’équilibre’, Revue Economique, n°5, pp.1460-1472.
  45. DAY R. H. [1995]b, ’Rationality entrepreneuship and institutional evolution’, Revue Economique, n°5, pp.1473-1486.
  46. DOSI G. [1988], ’Souces, procedures, and microeconomics effects of innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.XXVI, sept., pp.1120-1171.
  47. DOSI G. [1988]a, ’The nature of the innovative process’, in Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. by Dosi, Freeman, Nelson, Silverberg, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.221-238.
  48. DOSI G. et KANIOVSKI Y. [1994], ’The method of generalized urn schemes in the analysis of technological and economic dynamics’, in The Economics of Growth and Technical Change, ed. by Silverberg, Soete, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.261-284.
  49. DOSI G. et NELSON R. R. [1994], ’An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, n°4, pp.153-172.
  50. DOSI G., PAVITT K. et SOETE L. L. G. [1990], The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London
  51. DUCHARME L- M. et MOHNEN P. [1996], ’Externalités et taux de rendements sociaux de la R&D’, Economies et Sociétés, série Dynamique Technologique et Organisation, n°7, pp.193-217.
  52. DUFOURT D. [1995], ’Introduction - Economie de l’organisation réticulaire’, Economies et Sociétés, Collection Dynamique technologique et organisation, série W, n°9, pp.5-15.
  53. DUGUET E. et GREENAN N. [1997], ’Le biais technologique : Une analyse économétrique sur données individuelles’, Revue Economique, vol.48, n°5, pp.1061-89.
  54. ERICSON et PAKES [1995], ’Markov Perfect industry dynamics. A framework for empirical work’, Review of Economic Studies, 62, pp.53-82.
  55. ESWARAN M. et GALLINI N. [1996], ’Patent Policy and the Direction of Technological Change’, Rand Journal of Economics, 27(4), winter, pp.722-46.
  56. FLAIG G. et STADLER M. [1998], ’On the Dynamics of Product and Process Innovations : a bivariate random effects probit model’, Jahrbücher fur Nationalökonomie und Statistik, pp.401-417
  57. FLORENS J- P., FOUGÈRE D., KAMIONKA T. et MOUCHART M. [1994], ’La modélisation économétrique des transitions individuelles sur le marché du travail’, Economie & Prévision, n°116, pp.181-217.
  58. FOUGÈRE D. et KAMIONKA T. [1996], ’Individual labour market transitions’, in The econometrics of panel data. A handbook of the theory with applications ed. by Matyas L. et Sevestre P., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp.771-809
  59. FREEMAN C. [1982], The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Frances Pinter Publishers, London
  60. GEROSKI P. A. [1995], ’Markets for technology : knowledge, innovation and appropriability’, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, ed. by Stoneman P., Basil Blackwell, pp.90-131.
  61. GEROSKI P. A., VAN REENEN J. et WALTERS C. F. [1997], ’How persistently do firm innovate?’, Research Policy, 26, pp.33-48.
  62. GOLD B. [1980], ’On the adoption of technological innovations in industry : superficial models and complex decision’, Omega, vol.8, n°5, pp.505-516.
  63. GOMULKA S. [1990], The Theory of Technological Change and Economic Growth, Routledge, London
  64. GOURIEROUX C. [1989], Econometrie des variables qualitatives, Economica, Paris
  65. GREEN W. H. [1997], Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall International, London.
  66. GRUBER H. [1992], ’Persitence of Leadership in Product Innovation’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. XL, december, n°4, pp.350-366.
  67. GRUBER H. [1994], Learning and Strategic Product Innovation : Theory and Evidence for the semi-conductor industry, Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  68. GRUBER H. [1995], ’Strategic Process and Product Innovation’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.4, n°1, pp.17-25.
  69. HACCOU P. et MEELIS E. [1994], Statistical Analysis of Behavioural Data : An Approach Based on Time-Structured Models, Oxford University Press, New York
  70. HAMBRICK et MACMILLAN [1985], ’Efficiency of product R&D in business units : the role of strategic context’, Academic Management Journal, vol.28, september, pp.527-547.
  71. HARABI N. [1995], ’Appropriability of technological innovations : an empirical analysis’, Research Policy, 24, pp981-992.
  72. HART S. [1995], ’Where we have been and where we are going in new product development research’, in Product Development. Meeting the challenge of the Design-Marketing Interface, ed. by Bruce M. and Biemans W. G.; John Wiley & sons ; pp.15-42.
  73. HEINER R. A. [1988], ’Imperfect decisions and routinized production : implications for evolutionary modeling and inertial technical change’, in Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. by Dosi, Freeman, Nelson, Silverberg, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.148-169.
  74. HOLT K. [1987], ’The role of the user in product innovation’, in Innovation : Adaptation and Growth. An international perspective, ed. by Rothwell R. and Bessant J., Elsevier Science Publisher, pp.1-12.
  75. HUIBAN J- P. et BOUHSINA Z. [1997], ’Innovation, qualité du facteur travail et efficacité productive’, Cahier d’Economie et de Sociologie Rurale, n°44, pp.107-137
  76. JEWKES J., SAWERS D. et STILLERMAN R. [1958], The sources of invention, Macmillan Press, London, traduction de l’anglais par Ciry Anne, [1966], L’invention dans l’industire de la recherche à l’exploitation, 60 exemples récents ; Les Editions d’organisation, Paris.
  77. KAMIEN M. I. et SCHWARTZ N. L. [1970], ’Market structure, elasticity of demand and incentive to invent’, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.13, 241-252.KARLIN S. [1969], Introduction aux processus stochastiques (A first course in stochastic process), Dunod, Paris
  78. KARLIN S. et TAYLOR H. M. [1981], A Second Course in Stochastic Processes, Academic Press, Boston
  79. KLEPPER S. [1996], ’Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle’, The American Economic Review, june, pp.562-583.
  80. KLEVORICK A. K., LEVIN R. C., NELSON R. R. et WINTER S. G. [1995], ’On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities’, Research Policy, 24, pp185-205.
  81. KRAFT K. [1990], ’Are product and process innovations independent of each other ?’, Applied Economics, vol.22, pp.1029-1038.
  82. LE BAS C. [1991], Economie du Changement Technique, L’interdisciplinaire, Limonest
  83. LE BAS C. [1995], Economie de l’Innovation, Economica poche, Paris
  84. LE BAS C. [1999], ’Matériaux pour une économie de la propriété intellectuelle : problématiques, perspectives et problèmes’, Economie Appliquée, tomme LII, n°2, pp.7-49.
  85. LE BAS C. et ZUSCOVITCH E. [1993], ’Apprentissage technologique et organisation : une analyse des configurations micro-économiques’, Economies et Sociétés, n°1, pp.153-195.
  86. LE BAS C., CABAGNOLS A. et GAY C. [2000], ’How persistently do firms innovate? An evolutionary view. An empirical application of duration models’, Les cahiers de l’Innovation, n°1.
  87. LE BAS C., PICARD F. et SUCHECKI B. [1998], ’Innovation technologique, comportement de réseaux et performances : une analyse sur données indivivuelles’, Revue d’Economie Politique, vol.108, n°5, pp.625-644.
  88. LEE H. H. et STONE J. A. [1994], ’Product and Process Innovation in the Product Life Cycle: Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing Industries’, Southern Economic Journal, 60(3), January, pp.754-63.
  89. LEIPONEN A. [1997], Dynamic competences and firm performance, IIASA, Interim Report n°IR-97-006/February.
  90. LEVIN R. C. et REISS P. [1988], ’Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers’, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.19, n°4, winter, pp.538-556.
  91. LEVIN R. C., KLEVORICK A. K., NELSON R. R. et WINTER S. G. [1987], ’Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 3, (special issue), pp.783-831.
  92. LINK A. N. et LUNN J. [1984], ’Rate of R&D return and market structure’, Review of Industrial Organization, I, pp.232-239
  93. LOGAN J. A. [1981], ’A structural Model of the High-Order Markov Process Incorporating Reversion Effects’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol.8, pp.75-89.
  94. LUNDVALL B- A. [1988], ’Innovation as an interactive process : from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation’, in Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. by Dosi, Freeman, Nelson, Silverberg, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.349-369.
  95. LUNDVALL B- A. [1992], ’Introduction to National System of Innovation’, in National System of Innovation : Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, ed. by Lundvall, Pinter Publisher, London, pp.1-19.
  96. LUNDVALL B- A. et JOHNSON B. [1994], ’The learning ecconomy’, Journal of Industry Studies, vol.1, n°2, pp.23-42.
  97. LUNN J. [1986], ’An empirical analysis of process and product patenting : A simultaneous equation model’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.XXXIV, march, n°3, pp.319-330.
  98. LUNN J. [1987], ’An empirical analysis of firm process and product patenting’, Applied Economics, 19, pp.743-751.
  99. MACDISSI C. et NEGASSI S. [2000], Inter-firme cooperation and spillover, Communication, 70th AEA conference on Industrial Property Economics, ’Trademarks and Patents’ tenue à Alicante en Espagne en April 19-20.
  100. MACKUN P. et MACPHERSON A. D. [1997], ’Externally-Assisted Product Innovation in the Manufacturing Sector: The Role of Location, In-House R&D and Outside Technical Support’, Regional Studies, vol.29, n°7, pp.655-671
  101. MACPHERSON A. D. [1994], ’The Impact of Industrial Process Innovation among Small Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Evidence from Western New York’, Environment and Planning A, 26(3), march, pp.453-70.
  102. MADDALA G. S. [1983], Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press
  103. MAGEE S. P. [1977], ’Multinational corporations, the industry cycle and developpement.’, Journal of World Trade Law, juillet-Aout, pp.297-319.
  104. MAIDIQUE M. A. et ZIRGER B. J. [1984], ’A study of success and faillure in product innovation’, IEEE Transactions on engineering management, vol.31, n°4, pp.149-157.
  105. MALERBA F. et ORSENIGO L. [1993], ’Technological regimes and firm behavior’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.2, n°1, pp.45-71.
  106. MALERBA F. et ORSENIGO L. [1995], ’Schumpeterian patterns of innovation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, pp.47-65.
  107. MALERBA F. et ORSENIGO L. [1996], ’Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific’, Research Policy, 25, pp.451-478.
  108. MALERBA F. et ORSENIGO L. [1999], ’Technological entry, exit and survival: an empirical analysis of patent data’, Research Policy, vol.28, pp643-660.
  109. MALERBA F., ORSENIGO L. et PERETTO P. [1997], ’Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization’, Industrial Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.15, pp.801-826.
  110. MANSFIELD E. [1985], ’How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out ?’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.XXXIV, n°2, pp.217-223
  111. MANSFIELD E., RAPOPORT J., ROMEO A., WAGNER S. et BREADSLEY G. [1977], ’Social and private rates of return from industrial innovation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.XCI, may, pp.221-240.
  112. MANSFIELD E., SCHWARTZ M. et WAGNER S. [1981], ’Imitation costs and patents : an empirical study’, The Economic Journal, vol.91, december, pp.907-918.
  113. MARCH J. G. [1991], ’Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science, vol.2, pp.71-87.
  114. MARJIT S. et BELADI H. [1998], ’Product versus Process Patents: A Theoretical Approach’, Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(2), April, pp.193-99.
  115. MARTINEZ-ROS E. et LABEAGA J. M. [1999], Differences in the decision to carry out process and product innovations: The Spanish case, Contribution au TSER Network on Innovation and Economic Change, Delft, 12-13 February.
  116. MEHRAN F. [1989], ’Analysis of discrete longitudinal data: infinite lag Markov models’, Statistical Data Analysis and Inference, pp.533-541.
  117. MENARD S. [1995], Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 07-106
  118. MILGROM P. et ROBERTS J. [1990], ’The economics of modern manufacturing : technology, strategy, and organization’, The American Economic Review, june, pp.511-528.
  119. MINISTÈRE DE L’ÉDUCATION NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE et DE LA TECHNOLOGIE [1997], Recherche & Développement dans les entreprises : Résultats 1995
  120. MOATI P. [1992], Hétérogénéité des Entreprises et Echange International, Economica, Paris
  121. MOHNEN P. [1997], ’Introduction: Input-Output Analysis of Interindustry R&D Spillovers’, Economic Systems Research, vol.9, n°1, pp.3-8.
  122. MUELLER D. C. [1967], ’The firm decision process : an econometric investigation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.81, pp.58-87.
  123. NEGASSI S. [1997], Inter and Intra-industry R&D spillovers, human capital and technological performance in France : An Empirical Study, Document de travail du CESSEFI n°01/97.
  124. NELSON R. R. [1995], ’Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.XXXIII, pp.48-90.
  125. NELSON R. R. et WINTER S. G. [1982], An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, London
  126. NICOLAS F. [1996], ’Combined roles of process and product innovations in the Food industries’, in Economics of innovation : The case of food industry. Contributions to Economics, ed. by Galizzi Giovanni and Venturini Luciano, Heidelberg: Physica, pp.341-353.
  127. NONAKA I. [1995], ’Managing innovation as an organizational knowledge creation process’, in Technology Management and corporate strategies : a tricontinental perspective, ed. Allouche J. and Pogorel G., Elsevier Science publishers, pp.73-109.
  128. PAKES et ERICSON [1990], Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics, National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper, n°2893.
  129. PATEL P. et PAVITT K. [1994], ’Uneven and divergent technological accumilation among advanced countries: evidence and a framework of explanation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.3, n°3, pp.759-787.
  130. PAVITT K. [1984], ’Sectoral patterns of technological change : toward a taxonomy and a theory’, Research Policy, vol.13, n°6, pp.343-373.
  131. PAVITT K. [1998], ’Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn’t’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol.7, n°3, September, pp.433-52.
  132. PEARSON A. W. [1991], ’Managing innovation : an uncertainty reduction process’, in Managing Innovation, ed. by Henry J. and Walker D., Sage Publication, pp.18-27.
  133. PEGRAM G. G. [1975], ’A multinomial model for transition probability matrices’, Journal of applied probability, vol.12, pp.498-506 ;
  134. PEGRAM G. G. [1980], ’An autoregressive model for multilag Markov chains’, Journal of applied probability, vol.17, pp.350-362.
  135. POHLMEIER W. [1992], ’On the simultaneity of innovations and market strucutre’, Empirical Economics, 17, pp.253-272.
  136. RAFTERY A. E. [1985], ’A model for High-Order Markov chains’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol.47, n°3, pp.528-539.
  137. RICHARD J- F. [1990], Les activités mentales. Compredre, raisonner, trouver des solutions, Armand Colin, Paris
  138. ROMER P. M. [1986], ’Increasing returns and long run growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol.94, pp.1002-1037.
  139. ROMER P. M. [1990], ’Endogeneous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, n°5, pp.s71-s102.
  140. ROTTMANN H. et RUSCHINSKI M. [1997], ’Beschaftigungswirkungen des technischen Fortschritts. Eine Paneldaten-Analyse fur Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Deutschland’, Ifo-Studien, 43(1), pp.55-70.
  141. SAVIOTTI P. P. [1996], Technological Evolution, Variety, and the Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Hants, England
  142. SCHERER F. M. [1965], ’Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions’, The American Economic Review, vol.55, pp.1097-1123.
  143. SCHERER F. M. [1982], ’Interindustry technology flows in the united states’, Research Policy, vol.11, August, pp.227-245.
  144. SCHERER F. M. [1983], ’Concentration, R&D, and productivity change’, Southern Economic Journal, 50, juillet, PP.221-225.
  145. SCHERER F. M. [1991], ’Changing perspectives on the firm size problem’, in Innovation and Technological Change, ed. by Acs & Audretsch, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, pp.24-38.
  146. SCHINNARE A. P. et STEWMAN S. [1978], ’A class of Markov Models of Social Mobility with Duration Memory Patterns’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol.6, pp.61-86.
  147. SCHMOOKLER J. [1962], ’Economic Sources of inventive activity’, Journal of Economic History, vol.22, pp.1-10.
  148. SCHMOOKLER J. [1966], Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, London
  149. SCHUMPETER J. [1912], Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, London
  150. SHIEH S. [1993], ’Incentives for Cost-Reducing Investment in a Signalling Model of Product Quality’, Rand Journal of Economics, 24(3), pp.466-77.
  151. SINGER B. et SPILERMAN S. [1976], ’The representation of social processes by Markov models’, American Journal of Sociology, vol.82, N°1, pp.1-54.
  152. SINGER B. et SPILERMAN S. [1979], ’Clustering on the main diagonal in mobility matrices’, Sociological Methodology, vol.10, pp.172-208.
  153. SPENCE [1975], ’Monopoly, quality and regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol.6, pp.417-429.
  154. SPILERMAN S. [1972], ’The analysis of mobility processes by the introduction of independent variables into a markov chain’, American Socilogical Review, vol.37, no3, june, pp.277-294.
  155. STIEGLER G. J. [1961], ’The economics of information’, Journal of Political Economy, vol.69, june, pp.213-225.
  156. STRIEBEL [1975], Optimal control of discrete time stochastic systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New-York
  157. TAKEUCHI et NONAKA I. [1986], ’The new product development game’, Harvard Business Review, vol.64, n°1, pp.137-146.
  158. TEECE D. J. [1986], ’Profiting from technological innovation : implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy, vol.15, n°6, pp.285-305.
  159. TIROLE J. [1989], Théorie de l’Organisation Industrielle, Economica, Paris
  160. TOWNSEND J., HENWOOD F., PAVITT K. et WYATT S. [1981], Innovations in Britain since 1945, Science Policy Research Unit, Occasional Paper n°16.
  161. UTTERBACK J. M. [1994], Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation : how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change, President and Fellows of Harvard College
  162. UTTERBACK J. M. et ABERNATHY W. J. [1975], ’A dynamic model of product and process innovation’, Omega, vol.3, n°6, pp.639-656.
  163. VEGA-REDONDO F. [1999], ’Markov-perfect industrial dynamics with technolgoical path dependence’, Spanish Economic Review, vol.1, n°1, pp.21-54
  164. VERNON R. [1966], ’International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.LXXX, may, pp.190-207.
  165. VON HIPPEL E. [1977], ’The dominant role of user in semiconductor and electronic subassembly process innovation’, IEEE Transactions on engineering management, vol.EM-24, n°2, May, pp.60-77.
  166. VON HIPPEL E. [1982], ’Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovation’, Research Policy, vol.11, n°2, pp.95-115.
  167. VON HIPPEL E. [1982]a, ’Get new product from customers’, Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.117-122.
  168. YIN X. et ZUSCOVITCH E. [1998], ’Is firm size conducive to R&D choice? A strategic analysis of product and process innovations’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol.35, pp.243-262.
  169. YOUNG A. [1991], ’Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Mai, pp.369-405.
  170. YOUNG A. [1993], ’Invention and bounded learning by doing’, Journal of Political Economy, vol.101, n°3, pp.443-472.
  171. ZIMMERMANN K. F. [1987], ’Trade and Dynamic Efficiency’, Kyklos, vol.40, n°1, pp.73-87.
  172. ZIMMERMANN K. F. [1989], ’Innovative Activity and Industrial Structure’, Empirica, vol.16, n°1, pp.85-110.