Bibliographie

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1981). Effects of Prior knowledge on memory for new information. Memory & Cognition, 9,(3), 237-246.
  2. Aristote (env-330 av JC). Métaphysiques.
  3. Barrouillet, (1996). Ressources, capacités cognitives et mémoire de travail: postulats, métaphores et modèles. Psychologie Francaise, 41, 4, 319-338.
  4. Barsalou, L. B. (1995). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway & P. E. M. Morris (Eds.), Theories of Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Barton, S. B. and Sanford, A. J. (1995). A case-study of anomaly detection: shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition.
  6. Baudet, S. (1986). La mémorisation de récit chez l'enfant d'âge pré-scolaire : Origine sociale et accès à l'information stockée en mémoire. L'année psychologique, 86, 223-246.
  7. Baudet, S. (1988). Récupération de l'information sémantique en mémoire. European Journal of Psychology of Education, Special issue : Acquisition of knowledge from text and picture. G. Denhière & H. Mandl (Eds.), vol. III(2), 163-176.
  8. Baudet, S., & Cordier, F. (1992). Representation of complex actions : A developmental study. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 141-172.
  9. Black, J. B., & Bern, H. (1981). Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 20, 267-275.
  10. Black,J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223-250.
  11. Bloom, C. P., Fletcher, C. R. van den Broek P. W., Reitz, L., & Shapiro, B. P. (1990). An online assessment of causal reasoning during compréhension. Memory & Cognition, 18, 65-71.
  12. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for texts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
  13. Bradshaw, G. L., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Elaborative encoding as an explanation of levels of processing. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 21, 165-174.
  14. Campion, N. & Rossi, J. P. (1999). Inférences et compréhension de textes. L’année Psychologique, 99, 493-527.
  15. Carreiras, M. (1993). Minimalist misconceptions of mental models. PSYCOLOQUY 4(6) reading-inference.7.
  16. Charniak, E. (1986). A neat theory of maker passing. In T. Kehler, S. Rosenschein, R. Filman, & P. F. Patel-Schneider (Eds.), Proceedings AAAI-86 (pp. 584-588). Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
  17. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From Covariarion to Causation: A causal Power Theory. Psychological Review, 104 (2), 367-405.
  18. Clarke, S. (1738). A Discourse Concerning the Being and Attributes of God, 9th ed. London: Knapton Pubs.
  19. Clement (1996). L’effet du contexte semantique dans l’élaboration de la représentation du problème. L’année Psychologique, 96, 409-442.
  20. Cohen, Mac Winney, Flatt, & Provost, (1993). PsyScope : An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-270.
  21. Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, England: Cambrodge University Press.
  22. Curran, & Hintzman, (1997). Consequences and Causes of Correlations in Process Dissociation. Journal of experimental psychology, 23, 2, 496-504.
  23. Denhière, G. (1984). Il était une fois.... Compréhension et souvenir de récits. Lille, Presses Universitaires de Lille.
  24. Denhière, G., & Baudet S. (1992). Lecture compréhension de texte et science cognitive. Paris. Presses Universitaires de France.
  25. Dopkins, S. (1997). Text representations as reflected in patterns of cognitive distance. Memory & Cognition, 25 (1), 72-95.
  26. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3-19.
  27. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. London: MIT Press.
  28. Fletcher, C. R., van den Broek, P., & Arthur, E. (1996). A model of narrative comprehension and recall. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  29. Fletcher, C., R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 43-58.
  30. Fletcher, C.R. (1981). Short-term memory processes in text comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 264-274.
  31. Fletcher, C.R., & Bloom,C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory And Language, 27, 235-244.
  32. Gallilée (env 1620). Physical World.
  33. Garnham, A. (1992). Minimalism versus constructionism: A false dichotomy in theories of inference during reading. PSYCOLOQUY, 3(63) reading-inference-1.
  34. Garnham, A. (1993). An impartial view of inference making. PSYCOLOQUY, 4(17) reading-inference.17.
  35. Garnham, A. & Oakhill, J.V. (1993). Modeles mentaux et comprehension du langage. In M-F. Ehrlich, H. Tardieu & M. Cavazza (Eds.), Les modèles mentaux: Approche cognitive des representations. (pp.23-46). Paris: Masson.
  36. Garnham, A. Traxler, Oakhill, J. V., & Gersnbacher, M. A. (1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 35, 517-543.
  37. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J., (1990). Referential processes in reading: focusing on roles and individuals. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp.465-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  38. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hilldale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  39. Glenberg, A. M. & Mathew, S. (1992) When minimalism is not enough: Mental models in reading. PSYCOLOQUY, 3(64) reading-inference-2.1.
  40. Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated texts: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129-151.
  41. Glenberg, A. M., Kruley, P. & Langston, W. E. (1995). Analogical processes in comprehension: Simulation of a mental model. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics.
  42. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M. & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83.
  43. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., and Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597-602.
  44. Glenberg, A., M. (1993). Comprehension while missing the point: More on minimalism and models. PSYCOLOQUY, 3(93) reading-inference-13.
  45. Golden, R. M. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1993). A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 16(3), 203-238.
  46. Goldman, S.R., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1986). Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. Journal of Memory and language, 25, 401-418.
  47. Good, I. J. (1961). A causal calculus, I. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 11: 305-318.
  48. Good, I. J. (1993). A tentative measure of probabilistic causation relevant to the philosophy of the law. Journal of Statistics, Computation and Simulation, 47, 99-105.
  49. Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). The structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  50. Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J. (1993). A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145-160.
  51. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
  52. Gyselinck (1996). Illustration et modèles mentaux dans la comprehension de textes. L’année Psychologique, 96, 495-516.
  53. Haberlandt, K. (1993). Understanding mental models and inferences.PSYCOLOQUY, 4(5) reading-inference.6.
  54. Haberlandt, K., & Bingham, G. (1978). Verbs contribue to the coherence of breif narratives : Reading related and unrelated sentences-triples. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 419-425.
  55. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new ? Adquiring new informations as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
  56. Hobbs, J. R., Stickel, M. E., Appelt, D. E., & Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69-142.
  57. Huitema, J. S., Dopkins, S., Klin, C. M. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 1053-1060.
  58. Hume D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Reprinted Open Court Press, LaSalle, 1958.
  59. Humphreys, P. (1989). The Chances of Explanation. Princeton.
  60. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  61. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
  62. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Haward University Press.
  63. Just, & Carpenter. (1980). A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 4, 329-354.
  64. Kant (1948). Critique de la raison pure.
  65. Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446-463.
  66. Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
  67. Kekenbosch, C. (1989). Structure relationnelle d'un texte et rétention. In S. Baudet et G. Denhière (Eds.). Le diagnostic du fonctionnement cognitif dans la compréhension et la production de textes. Questions de logopédie, 21, 81-91.
  68. Kim, J. (1993). Causes and events: Mackie on causation. In E. Sosa and M. Tooley (eds.). Causation, Oxford University Press, pp. 42-56.
  69. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  70. Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 2, 87-1.
  71. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : A construction-integration Model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-183.
  72. Kintsch, W. A., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
  73. Kreindler, & Lumsden (1994). Extracting a Narrative’s Causal Gist: A modeling Study Based on Fuzzy Trace Theory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 227-251.
  74. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  75. Le Ny, J.-F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
  76. Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13:418-446.
  77. Lewis, D. (1986). Causation. In Philosophical Papers, Volume II, pp. 159-213. New York: Oxford University Press.
  78. Lewis, D. (2000). Causation as influence. In J. Collins and N. Hall and L. A. Paul (ed.), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. An abridged version appears in Journal of Philosophy, 97, 2000.
  79. Long, S., Seely, & Oppy, J. (1996). The Availability of Causal Information During Reading. Discourse processes 22, 145-170.
  80. Lorch, R. F. Jr., Klusewitz, M. A. & Lorch, E. P. (1995). Distinctions among reading situations. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 375-398). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  81. Lorch, R. F. Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A. (1995). College students’ conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 239-252.
  82. Lutz, Radvansky (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of memory and language., 36, 296-310.
  83. Mackie, J. (1965). Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly 2/4, 261-264. Reprinted in E. Sosa and M. Tooley (Eds.), Causation, Oxford University Press, 1993.
  84. Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  85. Mandler, J.M., & Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed : Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
  86. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 2, 91-115.
  87. McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
  88. McKoon, G., Ratcliff , R. (1989). Assessing the Occurrence of elaborative Inferences inferences with recognition: Compatibility checking vs Compound cue Theory. Journal of memory and language. 28, 547-563.
  89. McKoon, G., Ratcliff , R. (1989). Semantic associations and Elaborative inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 15, 2, 326-338.
  90. McKoon, G., Ratcliff , R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 3, 440-466.
  91. McKoon, G., Ratcliff , R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 18, 6, 1155-1172.
  92. Martins, D. & Le Bouédec, B. (1998). La production d’inférences mors de la compréhension de textes chez les adultes: Une analyse de la littérature. L’année psychologique, 98, 511-543.
  93. Mill, J. S. (1843). System of Logic, volume 1. John W. Parker, London, 1843.
  94. Miller, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1981). Readability and recall for short passages : A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335-354.
  95. Millis, Golding, Barker (1995). Discourse Processes. Causal Connectives Increase Inference Generation.
  96. Murray (1997). Connectives and Narrative text: The role of continuity. Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 227-236.
  97. Myers, J. L. & Duffy, S. A. (1990). Causal inferences and text memory. In A. C. Graesser and G. H. Bower (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation : Inferences and text comprehension, 25, 25-51. San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
  98. Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E. & Mason, R. A. (1994). Maintaining global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Leraning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 876-886.
  99. Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. (1984). Memory search without inference: The role of integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 217-242.
  100. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465.
  101. Nicolas, D. W., & Trabasso, T. (1981). Towards a taxonomy of inferences. In F. Wilkening and J. Becker (Eds.), Information integration by children (pp. 243-265). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
  102. Noordman, L.G.M. & Vonk, W. (1992). Reader's knowledge and the control of inference in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373-391.
  103. Noordman, L.G.M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inference during reading of expository texts., ?, ?, 573-590.
  104. Noordman, L.G.M. & Vonk, W. (1998). Memory-Based Processing in Understanding Causal Information. Discourse Processes, 26 (2&3), 191-212.
  105. O’Brien E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1991). The role of context in accessing antecedents in texts. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12(3), 346-352.
  106. O’Brien E. J., Raney, Albrecht, J. E. & Rayner (1997). Processes involved in the resolution of Explicit Anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23, 1-24.
  107. O'Brien, E. J. & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777-784.
  108. O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 419-427.
  109. O’Brien, E. J., (1981). Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Leraning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(2), 278-290.
  110. O'Brien, E. J., Duffy, S.A., & Myers, J. L. (1986). Anaphoric inference during reading. Journal of experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12. 346-352.
  111. Omanson, R.C. (1982). The relation between centrality and story category variation. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 21, 326-337.
  112. Pearl, J. (1996). Structural and Probabilistic Causality. In D.R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak, and D. L. Medin, (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, volume 34, pp. 393-435. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  113. Pearl, J. (1998). On the definition of actual cause. Technical Report R-259, Department of Computer Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  114. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  115. Piaget, J. (1961). Les mécanismes perceptifs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  116. Potts, R., G., Keenan, M. J. & Golding, J. M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399-415.
  117. Pribram, K. H. (1991). Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  118. Quintana, M. -P., Tapiero, I., & van den Broek, P. (en révision). Network Mental Representation of Narrative Texts: The Influence of Necessity and Sufficiency on the Detection of four Types of Causal Relations between Elements.Discourse Processes.
  119. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval Theory of Priming in Memory. Psychological Review, 95, 3, 385-408.
  120. Rossi, J. P. (1980). The function of frame in the comprehension of scientific text. Jounal of Educational Psychology, 82, 4, 727-732.
  121. Sanford, A. J. & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Aspects of coherence in written language: A psychological perspective. In T. Givon and M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  122. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. Chichester: Wiley.
  123. Schank, R. (1975). The structure of episodes in memory. In D.G. Bobrow & A.M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and Understanding : Studies in Cognitive Science. New York : Academic Press.
  124. Schank, R. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  125. Schank, R. G. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding (ch 3), 1-69. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  126. Schwartz & Smith, (1997). The Retrieval of related information influences Tip- of the Tongue states. Journal of memory and language, 36, 68-86.
  127. Shapiro, B. P., van den Broek, P., & Fletcher, C. R. (1995). Using Story-Based Causal Diagrams to Analyse Disagreemants About Complex Events. Discourse Processes, 20, 51-77.
  128. Singer, M. & Ritchot (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24 (6). 733-743
  129. Singer, M. (1994). Inference generation during reading. In Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479-515). New Yors: Academic Press.
  130. Singer, M. (1996). Comprehending Consistent and Iconsistent Causal Text Sequences: A Construction-Intregration Analysis. Discourse Processes. 21, 1-21.
  131. Singer, M., Graesser, A. C. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421-441.
  132. Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal Bridging Inferences in discourse understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507-524.
  133. Slucher, & Anderson., J. R. (1996), Using causal Persuasive Arguments to Change Beliefs and Teach new Information: The Mediating Role of Explanation Availability and Evaluation Bias in the Acceptance of Knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 1, 110-122.
  134. Smith, Q. (1995) "A Defence of a Principle of Sufficient Reason", Metaphilosophy, Volume 26, Nos. 1 and 2, pp. 97-106.
  135. Smolensky, P. (1986). Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundation of harmony theory. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 194-281). London: MIT Press.
  136. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In, R. Freedle (Eds.). Discourse processing : Multi-disciplinary perspectives. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
  137. Suppes, P. (1970). A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  138. Swartz, N. (1991) Beyond Experience: Metaphysical Theories and Philosophical Constraints. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  139. Swartz, N. (1997). Courses of introduction to logics and philosophy, Simon Fraser University.
  140. Tijus, C. & Moulin, (1997). L’assignation de significations étudiées à partir de textes d’histoires drôles. L’année Psychologique, 97, 33-75.
  141. Trabasso, T. (1991). The development of coherence of narratives by understanding international action. In G. Denhiere, & J.-P. Rossi (Eds.), Text and Text Processing. Amsterdam, North Holland. 79, 297-317.
  142. Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
  143. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. W (1985). Causal thinking and representations of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
  144. Trabasso, T., Secco, T., van den Broek, P.(1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and Comprehension of Text. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
  145. Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. W., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse processes, 12, 1-25.
  146. Traxler, M. J., Sanford, A. J., Aked, L. M., & Moxey, L. M. (1997). Processing Causal and Diagnostic Statements in Discourse. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning memory and cognition. 23, 1, 88-101.
  147. van den Broek, P. W., & Lorch R. F. Jr. (1989). The representation of causal relations in memory for narrative texts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  148. van den Broek, P. W., Fletcher, C. R., Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading : A theoretical and methological integration. Discourse processes, 16, 169-180.
  149. van den Broek, P. W., Trabasso, T., & Thurlow, R. (1990). The effects of story structure on children’s and adults’ ability to summarize stories. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
  150. van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. (1998). Comprehension and memory for texts: three generations of reading research. In S.R. Goldman, A. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Festschrift for Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  151. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of reader's standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  152. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1998). The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  153. van den Broek, P.W. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierachical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1-22.
  154. van den Broek, P.W. (1990a). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp.423-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  155. van den Broek, P.W. (1990b). Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative texts. In A. C. Graesser, & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Inferences and text comprehension. 25, 175-196. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  156. van den Broek, P.W. (1990c). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts : Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  157. van den Broek, P.W., & Thurlow, R. (1990). Reinstatements and elaborative inferences during the reading of narratives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society, New Orleans, LA.
  158. van Dijk,T. A. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague, Mouton.
  159. van Dijk,T. A. (1977). Text and context.London, Longman.
  160. van Dijk,T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  161. van Dijk,T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York : Academic Press.
  162. Vonk, W. & Noordman, L.,G.,M. (1990). On the control of inferences in text understanding. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds). Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
  163. Warren, W. H., Nicolas, D. W., & Trabasso, T. (1979). Event chain and inferences in understanding narratives. In R. O. Freedle (Eds.), New directions in discourse processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  164. White, T. (1991). Discovering Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  165. White, T. (1997). Naive ecology: Causal judgements about simple ecosystems. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 219-233.
  166. Whitney, & Budd (1996). Think-Aloud Protocols and the Study of Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 341-351.
  167. Zwaan, R. A. & Graesser, A. C. (1993). Reading goals and situation models. PSYCOLOQUY 4(3) reading-inference.4.