B

1. Backsheider, A. G., Shatz, M., & Gelman, S. A. (1993). Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish living kinds as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64,1242-1257.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Baeckman, L., Small, B. J., & Wahlin, A. (2001). Aging and memory: Brain and biological perspectives. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handboock of psychology of aging (pp.349-377). (5th ed.) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence. Child Development, 62(6), 1227-1246.
5. Baillargeon, R., & Graber M. (1987). Where is the rabbit? 5.5-month-old infants’ representation of the height of hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 375-392.
6. Balaban, M., & Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3-26.
7. Balota, D. A., & Duchek, J. M. (1991). Semantic priming effects, lexical repetition effects, and contextual disambiguation effects in healthy aged individuals and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Language, 40, 181-201.
8. Banigan, R. L., & Mervis, C. B. (1988). Role of adult input in young children’s category evolution: An experimental study. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 193-504.
9. Bardin, A. (2002). Taille et couleur dans l’imagerie mentale visuelles. Manuscrit de Maîtrise de psychologie cognitive, Université Lumière Lyon 2.
10. Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1989). Taxonomies and triads: Conceptual organisation in one- to two-year-olds. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 156-184.
11. Bayles, K. A., Tomoeda, C. K., & Trosset, M. W. (1990). Naming and categorical knowledge in Alzheimer’s disease: The process of semantic memory deterioration. Brain and Language, 39, 498-510.
12. Beauvois, M. F., & Saillant B. (1985). Optic aphasia for colour and colour agnosia: A distinction between visual and visuo-verbal impairements in the processing of colours. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 1-48.
13. Bedoin, N. (1992). Etude de l’articulation de différentes procédures mentales dans les activités sémantiques : exemples de la lecture et de la catégorisation. Thèse de doctorat de psychologie, Université Lumière Lyon 2.
14. Bedoin, N. (1998, september). Phonological feature activation in visual word recognition. XI Congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology ESCOP, Jerusalem, Israel.
15. Bedoin, N. (1999). Constraints on induction in a verbal and perceptual conflicting task: Familiarity, biological and psychological attributes in early infancy. Proceeding of the 1st bisontine conference for Conceptual and Linguistic Development in the Child aged from 1 to 6 year (pp.1-6). Besançon, France.
16. Bedoin, N. (soumis). Sensitivity to voicing similarity in printed stimuli: Effect of a training programme in dyslexic children. Journal of Phonetics.
17. Bedoin, N., Baciu, M., Honoré-Masson, S., Vernier, M. P., Koenig, O., & Segebarth, C. (en préparation). Neural basis for semantic categorization and attribute knowledge retrieval in living things: an fMRI investigation.
18. Bedoin, N., & Brédard, C. (2001, octobre). Apprentissage d’objets nouveaux et spécificité des catégries dans les premiers stades de la maladie d’Alzheimer. VIème Réunion Francophone sur la Maladie d’Alzheimer et les Syndromes Apparentés et Réunion Internationale de la Société Française de Neurologie sur les Démences, Bordeaux, France.
19. Bedoin, N., & Dissard, P. (1992). Quantification de l’analogie et concept de spécicalité. In M. Brissaud, M. Grange & N. Nicoloyannis (Eds.), Intelligence artificielle et sciences humaines (pp. 73-91). Paris : Hermès.
20. Bedoin, N., Baciu, M., Honoré, S., Vernier, M. P., Koenig, O., & Segebarth, C. (2001, september). Retrieving structural and functional attributes about living things at different levels of hierarchy: An fMRI investigation. XIIth conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP), Edinburg, Scotland.
21. Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition, 60(2), 105-141.
22. Bertenthal, B. I., Proffitt, D. R., Spetner, N. B., & Thomas, M. A. (1985) The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. Child Development, 56(3), 531-543
23. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
24. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
25. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 447-457.
26. Bird, T. D. (1994). Famillial Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of Neurology, 36, 335-335.
27. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60(1), 1-29.
28. Bloom, P. (1998). Theories of artifact categorization. Cognition, 66(1), 87-93.
29. Bloom, P. (2002). Mindreading, communication and the learning of names for things. Mind and Language, 17(1-2), 37-54.
30. Bolla, K. I., Lindgreen, K. N., Bonaccorsy, C., & Bleecker, M. L. (1991). Memory complaints in older adults. Fact or fiction? Archives of Neurology, 48(1), 61-64.
31. Bomba, P. C., & Siqueland, E. R. (1983). The nature and structure of infant form categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 294-328.
32. Bosman, A. M. T., & van Orden, G. C. (1998). Pourquoi l’orthographe est-elle plus difficile que la lecture ? In L. Rieben, M. Fayol, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Des orthographes et leur acquisition (pp. 207-230). Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé.
33. Boucart, M. (1996). La reconnaissance des objets. Grenoble : Presses Universitaire de Grenoble.
34. Bowen, J., Teri, L., Kukull, W. & McCornick, W. (1997). Progression to dementia in patients with isolated memory loss. The Lancet, 349, 763-765.
35. Boyer, P., Bedoin, N., & Devinck, F. (2000). Typicality evaluated by specicality can predict performances in a categorisation task. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 288.
36. Boyer, P., Bedoin, N., & Honoré, S. (2000). Relative contributions of kind- and domain- level concepts to expectations concerning unfamiliar exemplars: Developmental change and domain differences. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 457-479.
37. Boyer, P. (2001). Et l’homme créa les dieux : comment expliquer la religion. Paris : Robert Laffont.
38. Brown, H. D., Kosslyn, S. M., & Dror, I. E. (1998). Aging and scanning of imagined and perceived visual images. Experimental Aging Research, 24(2), 181-194.
39. Bruyer, R., & Scailquin, J. C. (2000). Effects of aging on the generation of mental images. Experimental Aging Research, 26(4),337-351.
40. Buxbaum, L. J., Veramonti, T., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing “what for” but not “how”. Neurocase, 6(2), 83-97.