M

1. Magnie, M. N., Ferreira, C., Giusiano, B., & Poncet, B. (1999). Category specificity in object agnosia: Perservation of sensorimotor experiences related to objects. Neuropsychologia, 37(1), 67-74.
2. Mandler, J. M., & Bauer P. J. (1988). The cradle of categorization: Is the basic level basic? Cognitive Development, 3, 247-264.
3. Mandler, J. M., Bauer P. J., & McDonough, L. (1991). Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiation global categories. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 263-298.
4. Mandler, J. M., & McDonough, L. (1993). Concept formation in infancy. Cognitive Development, 8, 291-318.
5. Mandler, J. M. (2000). Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 3-36.
6. Margolin, D. I., Pate, D. S., & Friedrich, F. J. (1996). Lexical priming by pictures and words in normal aging and in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Brain and Language, 54, 275-301.
7. Marques, J. F. (2000). The “living things” impairement and the nature of semantic memory organisation: An experimental study using PI-release and semantic cues. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(8), 683-707.
8. Martin, A. (1992). Semantic knowledge in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for degraded representations. In L. Baeckman (Ed.), Memory functioning in Dementia. Advances in Psychology (pp. 119-150). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(2), 194-201.
10. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
11. Massey, C. M., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschooler’s ability to decide whether a photographed object can move itself. Developmental Psychology, 24, 307-317.
12. McCarthy R. A., & Warrington E. K. (1988). Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain. Nature, 334, 428-430.
13. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
14. McGregor, K. K., Friedman, R. M., Reilly, R. M., & Newman, R. M. (2002). Semantic representation and naming in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(2), 332-346.
15. McKenna, P., & Parry, R. (1994). Category specificity in the naming of natural and man-made objects: Normative data from adults and children. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 4, 225-281.
16. Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.
17. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207-238.
18. Mehta, Z., Newcombe, F., & De Hann, E. (1992). Selective loss of imagery in a case of visual agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 30, 645-655.
19. Menon, V., Anagnoson, R. T., Glover, G. H., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2000). Basal ganglia involvement in memory-guided movement sequencing. Neuroreport, 11(16), 3641-5.
20. Mervis, C. B. (1987). Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concept and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21. Metz-Lutz, M. N., Kremin, H., Deloche, G., Hannequin, D., Ferrand, I., Perrier, D., Quint, S., Dordain, M., Bunel, G., Cardebat, D., Larroque, C., Lota, A. M., Pichard, B., & Blavier, A. (1991). Standardisation d’un test de dénomination orale : contrôle des effets de l’âge, du sexe et du niveau de scolarité chez les sujets adultes normaux. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 1(1), 73-95.
22. Miller, J. L., & Bartsch, K. (1997). The development of biological explanation: Are children vitalists? Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 156-164.
23. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
24. Milner, B. (1966). Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. In C. W. M. Whitty, & O. L. Zangwill (Eds.), Amnesia (pp. 109-133). London: Butterworths.
25. Monsch, A. U., Bondi, M. W., Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Katzman, R., & Thal, L. J. (1992). Comparisons of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 49(9), 1253-1258.
26. Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner, & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. (pp. 148-197). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Montanes, P., Goldblum, M. C., & Boller, F. (1995). The naming impairment of living and nonliving items in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 39-48.
28. Montanes, P., Goldblum, M. C., & Boller, F. (1996). Classification deficits in Alzheimer’s disease with special reference to living and non livings things. Brain and Language, 1, 335-358.
29. Moore, C. J., & Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain, 122, 943-962.
30. Moreaud, O. (2000). Connaissances sémantiques et maladie d’Alzheimer : apport de la neuropsychologie cognitive. Thèse de doctorat de neuropsychologie, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1.
31. Morris, J. C., Storandt, M., Miller, J. P., McKeel, D. W., Price, J. L., Rubin, E. H. & Berg, L. (2001). Mild Cognitive Impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 58(3), 397-410.
32. Morton, J. A. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
33. Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non living things. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 60-82.
34. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., Durrant Peatfield, M., & Bunn, E. M. (1998). Two eyes of a see-through: Impaired and intact semantic knowledge in a case of selective deficit for living things. Neurocase, 4, 291-310.
35. Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J. R., & Price, C. J. (1998). Functional neuroanatomy of the semantic system: Divisible by what ? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(6), 766-777.
36. Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
37. Murphy, D. G., DeCarli, C., McIntosh, A. R., Daly, E., Mentis, M. J., Pietrini, P., Szczepanik, J., Schapiro, M. B., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., & Rapoport, S. I. (1996). Sex differences in human brain morphometry and metabolism: An in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging positron emission tomography study on the effect of aging. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(7), 585-594.