Références

  1. Adams, M.J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
  2. Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T.A., (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123-150.
  3. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
  4. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
  5. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
  6. Allen, P.A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T.A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency and exposure duration in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (4), 914-934.
  7. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 340-357.
  8. Baron, J., & Thurstone, I. (1973). An analysis of the word superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-228.
  9. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801-820.
  10. Besner, D. (1983). Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 429-438.
  11. Besner, D. (1989). On the role of outline shape and word-specific visual pattern in the identification of function words: NONE. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A(1), 91-105.
  12. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
  13. Bouma, H. (1971). Visual word recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.
  14. Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interferencein the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.
  15. Bowers, J.S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7 (1), 83-99.
  16. Bozon, F., & Carbonnel, S. (1996). Influence des voisins orthographiques sur l’identification de mots et de pseudomots. Revue de neuropsychologie, 2, 219-237.
  17. Bradshaw, J. L. & Nettleton, N. C. (1983). Human cerebral asymmetry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  18. Bryden, M. P. (1982). Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.
  19. Brysbaert, M. (1994). Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 64, 151-161.
  20. Brysbaert, M. (2004). The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception. Brain and Language, 88, 259-267.
  21. Brysbaert , M., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1988). Callosal transmission in reading. In: G. Luer, U. Lass, & J. Shallo-Hoffman (Eds.), Eye movement research: Physiological and psychological aspects, (pp. 246-266). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  22. Brysbaert , M., & Meyers, C. (1993). The optimal viewing position for children with normal and with poor reading abilities. Facets of Dyslexia and its Remediation, 107-123.
  23. Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10 (3), 385-395.
  24. Carr, T.H. (1986). Perceiving visual language. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J.P. Thomas (Eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol II. Wiley, New York, pp.29:1- 29:92.
  25. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
  26. Cattell, J.M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220-242, 377-392, 524-538
  27. Chiarello, C., Liu, S., & Shears, C. (2001). Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects. Brain and Language, 79, 360-378.
  28. Clark, J.J. & O’Regan, J.K. (1999). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 39 (4), 843-857 .
  29. Coltheart, M. (1984). Sensory memory: A tutorial review. In H. Bouma & D.B.Bouwhuis (Eds), Attention and Performance X, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  30. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
  31. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T., Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
  32. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 (1), 204-256
  33. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex, une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le français écrit et parlé. L'année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
  34. Content, A., & Radeau, M. (1988). Données statistiques sur la structure orthographique du français. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, N° hors-série.
  35. Deutsch, A., & Rayner, K.(1999). Initial fixation position in reading Hebrew words. Langage and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393-421.
  36. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. (1995). Tilted letters and tilted words: A possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 23, 560-568.
  37. Ducrot, S., Pynte, J. (2002). What determines the eyes' landing position in words? Perception & Psychophysics. 64(7):1130-44.
  38. Dunn-Rankin, P. (1978). The visual characteristics of words Scientific American, 238, 122-130.
  39. Erdmann, B. & Dodge, R. (1898). Psychologische Untersuchungen über das Lesen auf experimentaller Grundlage. Halle : Niemeyer.
  40. Eriksen, B.A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). The importance of being first: A tachistoscopic study of the contribution of each letter to the recognition of four-letter words. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 66-72.
  41. Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.
  42. Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., & Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 1-15.
  43. Evett, L.J. & Humphreys, G.W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.
  44. Farid, M., & Grainger, J. (1996). How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: A comparison of French and Arabic. Brain and Langage, 53, 351-368.
  45. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (2001). Homophone interference effects. Manuscrit soumis à publication.
  46. Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R.J. Wales & E.W. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp.257-287). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
  47. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 696-713.
  48. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 370-384.
  49. Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language 87, 432–440.
  50. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1991). Masked constituent letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 413-434.
  51. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: Effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 951-964.
  52. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
  53. Grainger , J. & Jacobs , A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
  54. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
  55. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
  56. Grainger, J. & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198
  57. Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W.J.B. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In The Mental Lexicon (Bonin, P., ed.), Nova Science, New York (sous presse).
  58. Greenberg, J.H. (1966). Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  59. Healy, A.F., & Cunningham, T.F. (1992). A developmental evaluation of the role of word shape in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20 (2), 141-150.
  60. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading. Academic Press, New York.
  61. Holmes, V.M., & O’Regan, J.K. (1987). Decomposing French words. In J.K. O’Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 459-466). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  62. Huckauf, A., Heller, D., & Nazir, T. A. (1999). Lateral Masking: Limitations of the feature interaction account. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 177-89.
  63. Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading (Reprinted 1968). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  64. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
  65. Hyöna, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
  66. Imbs, P. (1971). Etudes statistiques sur le vocabulaire français. Dictionnaire de fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et Xxe siècles. Centre de recherche pour un trésor de la langue française (CNRS), Nancy. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
  67. Inhoff, A.W., Briihl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 24, 466-476.
  68. Inhoff, A.W., & Tousman, S. (1990). Lexical priming from partial-word previews. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 16, 825-836.
  69. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
  70. Jordan, T. R., & Patching, G. R. (2003). Assessing effects of stimulus orientation on perception of lateralized words and nonwords. . Neuropsychologia, 41, 1693–1702.
  71. Jordan, T. R., Redwood, M., & Patching, G. R. (2003). Effects of format familiarity on perception of words pseudowords and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 537– 548.
  72. Kajii, N. (2000). Unpublished dissertation, University of Kyoto.
  73. Kajii, N., & Osaka, N. (2000). Optimal viewing position in vertically and horizontally presented Japanese words. Perception & Psychophysics , 62, 1634-1644.
  74. Kirsner, K., & Schwartz, S. (1986). Words and hemifelds: Do the hemispheres enjoy equal opportunity? Brain and Cognition, 5, 354–361.
  75. Knecht, S., Deppe, M., Drager, B., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Ringlestein, E., Henningsen, H. (2000). Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain, 123 (1), 74–81.
  76. Lima, S.D., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 310-332.
  77. Levi, D.M., Klein, S.A., & Aitsebaomo, A.P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research, 25, 963-977.
  78. Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 724-738.
  79. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
  80. Mathey, S. (2001). L’influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 (1), 1-23.
  81. Mayall K, & Humphreys GW. (1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning and Memory Cognition, 22(2):278-294.
  82. Mayall K, Humphreys GW, Olson A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning and Memory Cognition, 23(5):1275-86.
  83. McCann, R.S.,& Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomphones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human, Perception & Performance, 13, 14-24.
  84. McClelland, J.L. (1976). Preliminary letter recognition in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human, Perception & Performance, 2, 80-91.
  85. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
  86. McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
  87. McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., Zola, D. & Jacobs, A.M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46,245-253.
  88. Montant, M. Nazir, T.A., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15 (1/2), 93-140.
  89. Nazir, T.A. (1993). On the relation between the optimal and the preferred viewing position in words during reading. In G. Ydewalle & J. van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception & Cognition: Advances in eye movement research, (pp. 349-361). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  90. Nazir, T. A. (2000). Traces of print along the visual pathway. In: Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D. & Pynte, J. (Eds). Reading as a perceptual process . (pp. 3-23). North-Holland.
  91. Nazir, T . A. (2003) On hemispheric specialization and visual field effects in the perception of print. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 73-80.
  92. Nazir, T. A., Benboutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2004). Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words. Brain & Language, 88, 244-311.
  93. Nazir, T. A., Decoppet, N., & Aghababian, V. (2003). On the origins of age-of-acquisition effects in the perception of written words. Developmental Science, 6 :2, 145-152.
  94. Nazir, T. A & Deprez, V. (2003). De l’oral à l’écrit, et réciproquement. Science & Vie Hors série.
  95. Nazir, T.A., Heller, D., & Sussmann C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition : The optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 315-328.
  96. Nazir, T.A., Jacobs, A.M, & O'Regan, J.K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26 (4), 810-821.
  97. Nazir, T.A., & Montant, M. (1996). Les étapes de traitement précoces dans la reconnaissance visuelle des mots. In S. Carbonnel, P. Gillet, M.-D. Martory & S.Valdois (Eds.), Approche cognitive des troubles de la lecture et de l'ecriture chez l'enfant et l'adulte. (pp 183-193). Marseille: Solal.
  98. Nazir, T.A., O'Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
  99. New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., Matos R. (2001) Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE, L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462. http://www.lexique.org
  100. Olzak, L.A., & Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In: K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, (Vol. II, pp. 7:1-7:56). New york, Wiley.
  101. O’Regan, J.K. (1981). The convenient viewing position hypothesis. In D.F. Fisher, R.A. Monty, & J.W.Senders (Eds.), Eye movements, cognition, and visual perception (pp.289-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  102. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier
  103. O’Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1992). Optimal viexing position effects in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185-197.
  104. O’Regan, J.K., Levy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250-257.
  105. Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1129-1157.
  106. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: the word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
  107. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shape’s in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 10 (3), 413-428.
  108. Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In Masked Priming: State of the Art (Kinoshita, S. and Lupker, S.J., eds), pp. 97–120, Psychology Press.
  109. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 767-779.
  110. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1995). Letter position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 875-890.
  111. Peressotti, F. and Grainger, J. (1999) The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691–706.
  112. Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K; (1981). Asymetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174-180.
  113. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. (1999). The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1142-1158.
  114. Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 473-484.
  115. Pujol, J., Deus, J., Losilla, J.M., Capdevila, A. (1999). Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology, 52(5), 1038–43.
  116. Pynte J. (1996). Lexical control of within-word eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 958-969.
  117. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 17, 458–570.
  118. Radach, R., & Kempe, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213-226). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  119. Rayner, K.(1979). Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
  120. Rayner, K., McConkie, G.W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
  121. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall.
  122. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280.
  123. Rey-Debove, J. (1984). Le domaine de la morphologie lexicale. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 45, 3-19.
  124. Rumelhart, D.E., & Mc Clelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
  125. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language, Cognitive, Processes, 19 (3), 333-367.
  126. Schwartz, S., & Kirsner, K. (1982). Laterality effects in visual information processing: Hemisphere specialization or the orientating of attention? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 61–77.
  127. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood frequency and neighborhood size effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
  128. Segui, J. (1991). La reconnaissance visuelle des mots. In R. Kolinski, J. Morais & Segui (Eds), La reconnaissance des mots dans les différentes modalités sensorielles: études de psycholinguistique cognitive (pp. 99-117). Paris: PUF.
  129. Shillcock, R., Ellison, T.M. & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107(4), 824-851.
  130. Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247-266.
  131. Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65 (1), 133-151.
  132. Townsend, J.T., Taylor, S.G., & Brown, D.R. (1971). Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time. Perception and Psychophysics , 10, 375-378.
  133. Underwood, G., Clews, S., & Everatt, J. (1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distribution influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 39-65.
  134. Vitu, F. (1991). The influence of reading rhythm on the optimal landing position effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 58-75.
  135. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J.K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous texts. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 583-600.
  136. Weymouth, F.W., Hines, D.C., Acres, L.H., Raaf, J.E. & Wheeler, M.C. (1928). Visual acuity within the area centralis and its relation to eye movements and fixation. American Journal of Ophtalmology , 11, 947-960.
  137. Whitney, C.S., & Berndt, R.S (1999). A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia. Progress in Brain Research , 121, 143-163.
  138. Whitney, C.S. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8: 221-243
  139. Ziegler, J.C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, 53-62.
  140. Ziegler, J.C., Rey, A., & Jacobs, A.M. (1998). Simulating individual word identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task. Memory & Cognition, 26 (3), 490-501.
  141. Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 2.