Bibliographie

1. Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2003). Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 372-382.
2. Alario, F-X & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179-223.
3. Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 531-552.
4. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthorgraphic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-46.
5. Andriamamonjy, P. (2000). Le rôle du genre grammatical au cours de la reconnaissance de noms. L’année psychologique, 3.
6. Andriamamonjy, P., Colé, P., & Pynte, J. (2001). Le traitement de l'accord grammatical du Français. Verbum, XXIII, 449-476.
7. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193-216.
8. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
9. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
10. Barber, H., Carreiras, M. 2005. Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 17, 137-153.
11. Barber, H., Carreiras, M. 2003. Integrating gender and number information in Spanish word pairs: an ERP study. Cortex, 39(3), 465-482.
12. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 85(7), 992-1004.
13. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(6), 847-862.
14. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavioral research methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158-167.
15. Bonin, P., Méot, A., Aubert, L., Malardier, N., Niedenthal, P., & Capelle-Toczed, M-C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 867 mots. L'Année Psychologique, 104, 655-694.
16. Bowers, J.S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of word identification and repetition priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83-99
17. Bowers, J.S. (2000). The modality specific and non-specific components of long-term priming are frequency sensitive. Memory & Cognition. 28, 406-414.
18. Bowers, J.S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998). Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1705-1719
19. Brown, A.S. (1991). A review of the Tip-of-the-tongue experience. Physiological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.
20. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177-208.
21. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 3109-343.
22. Carello, C., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition, 16, 187–195.
23. Chevaux, F. & Meunier, F. (soumis). Gender Priming & Visual Word Recognition in French. The Mental Lexicon .
24. Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., Curran, T., & Miller, M. B. (1994). Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? How to answer the question. Developmental Review, 14, 159-185.
25. Colé, P., & Ségui, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 387-394.
26. Colé, P., Pynte, J., & Andriamamonjy, P. (2003). Effect of grammatical gender on visual word recognition: Evidence from lexical decision and eye movement experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 407-419.
27. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
29. Coltheart, M., & Davies, M. 1992. Le concept de modularité à l’épreuve de la neuropsychologie, in Daniel Andler, dir., p.109-130.
30. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
31. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J.C (2001) DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud, Psychological Review, 108 , 204-256.
32. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge: University Press.
33. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N, (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1283-1296.
34. Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The gender congruity effect: evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 381-391.
35. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Overlapping phonological and semantic activation in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
36. Dahan, D., Swingley, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2000). Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 465-480.
37. Dehaene, S. 2003. The neural basis of Weber-Fechner's law: Neuronal recordings reveal a logarithmic scale for number. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 145--147.
38. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. 1998. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.
39. Dell G.S., (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production, Psychological Review, 93(3), 283-321.
40. Dell G.S., (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
41. Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist Models of Language Production: Lexical Access and Grammatical Encoding. Cognitive Science, 23(4). 517-542.
42. Dell, G. S. & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al. Psychological Review, 98(4), 615-618.
43. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical Access in Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4). 801-838.
44. Desrochers, A., (1986). Genre grammatical et classification nominale. Canadian journal of Psychology. 40(3), 224-250.
45. Desrochers, A., et Brabant, M. (1995). Interaction entre facteurs phonologiques et sémantiques dans une épreuve de catégorisation lexicale. Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 49, 240-262.
46. Desrochers, A., & Paivio, A. (1990). Le phonème initial des noms inanimés et son effet sur l’identification du genre grammatical. Revue canadienne de psychologie, 44, 44-57.
47. Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L’effet de la fréquence d’usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l’identification du genre grammatical. Revue canadienne de psychologie, 43, 62-73.
48. Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., & Ségui, J. (1999) The processing of grammatical gender and number in Spanish, Journal Psycholinguistic Research, Special Issue " Processing of Grammatical Gender ", 28(5), 485-498.
49. Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123-138.
50. Erickson, C. W., Pollack, M. D, & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502-507.
51. Evett, L.J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 325-350.
52. Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect re-examined. Psychonomic Bulletin & review, 7(1), 142-148.
53. Ferrand, L. (2001). Cognition et Lecture. Processus de base de la reconnaissance des mots écrits chez l'adulte . Bruxelles : DeBoeck Université.
54. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A , 353-372.
55. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.
56. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 47A, 365-382.
57. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press.
58. Fonteneau, E., Frauenfelder, U, H., & Rizzi, L. (1998). On the contribution of ERPs to the study of language comprehension. Bulletin Suisse de linguistique appliquée, 68, 111-124.
59. Forster, K. (1976). ‘Accessing the mental lexicon.’ In Altmann, G.T.M. (eds.) 2002. Psycholinguistics: Critical Concepts in Psychology. Routledge.
60. Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor, in Cooper, W. & Walker, E. (Eds.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett.
61. Forster, K.I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 465-495.
62. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Special Issue: Celebrating a quarter century of (the Journal of) Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 203-233.
63. Forster, K.I., & Bednall, E.S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53-61.
64. Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
65. Friederici, A.D. & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 467-484.
66. Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances, Language 47, 27-52.
67. Fromkin, V.A. et coll. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence, La Haye, Mouton.
68. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
69. Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Volume 9). New York: Academic Press.
70. Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language Production (Volume 1). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
71. Gaskell, G., Spinelli, E. & Meunier, F. (2002). Perception of Resyllabification in French. Memory and Cognition, 30, 798-810.
72. Gemba, H., & Sasaki, K. (1989). Potential related to no-go reaction to go/no-go hand movement task with color discrimination in human. Neuroscience Letters, 101, 263-268.
73. Gollan, T., Frotz, R. (2002).Two routes to grammatical Gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(6), 104-115.
74. Godon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Vearbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
75. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.
76. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
77. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
78. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A.M. (1999). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming. Visual Cognition, 6, 461-492.
79. Grainger, J. & Ségui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
80. Grainger, J., Van Kang, N., & Segui, J. (2001). Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones. Memory & Cognition, 29, 53-61.

1. Grosjean, F., Dommergues, J. Y., Cornu, E., Guillelmon, D. & Besson, C. (1994). The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics. 56(5), 590-598.
2. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. ( 1999). Brain responses during sentence reading: visual input affects central processes. Neuroreport, 10(15), 3175-3178.
3. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Savic, M. & Turvey, M. T. (1986). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 692-701.
4. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Moskovljevic, J., & Turvey, M. T. (1986). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition, 19, 55-71.
5. Hernandez, A., Bates, E., & Avila L.X. (1996). Processing across the language boundary: A cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 846-864.
6. Hino, Y. & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 26, 166-183.
7. Hockett, Charles F. 1958. "Two models of grammatical description". Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York. 1945–1985. New York: International Linguistic Association.
8. Holmes, V. & Ségui, J. (2004) Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Reasearch, 33, 425-457.
9. Hudson, P. T., & Bergman, M., W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 46-58.
10. Jescheniak, J-D & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 824-843.
11. Jescheniak, J.D., & Schriefers, H.J. (1998). Serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in language production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24 (5), 1256-1274.
12. Karmilofff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child Language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kolinski, R., Morais, J., & Ségui, J. 1991. La reconnaissance des mots dans les différentes modalités sensorielles : Etudes de Psycholinguistique Cognitive. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
14. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Levelt, W.J.M. (1999a). Producing spoken language: a blueprint of the speaker. In P. Hagoort & C.M. Brown (Eds.). The Neurocognition of language (pp. 94-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Levelt, W.J.M. (1999b). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223-232.
17. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-76.
18. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access during speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98. 122-142.
19. Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., & Turvey, M.T. (1993). Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access; TOWED primes FROG. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 461-466.
20. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1990a). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory & Cognition, 18, 128-152.
21. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1990b). Automatic and prelexical computation of phonology in visual word identification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 325-343.
22. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. (1996). Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 823-835.
23. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
25. Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M., & Schartz, M. F. (1994). Origines of paraphasias in deep disphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain & Language, 46, 609-660.
26. Masson, M. E. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2003). A retrospective view of masked priming: Toward a unified account of masked and long-term repetition priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 57-94). New York: Psychology Press.
27. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter percep­tion: Part 1. An account of basic finding. Psycholog­ ical Review, 88, 375-407.
28. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). John Ridley Stroop: Creator of a landmark cognitive task. Canadian Psychology, 32, 521-524.
29. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997a). On knowing the auxiliary of a verb that cannot be named: evidence for independence of grammatical and phonological aspect of lexical knowledge. Journal of Cognitive neuroscience, 9. 160-166.
30. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997b). The retrieval of lexical-syntactic feathures. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23. 1410-1423.
31. Miozzo, M. & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of lexical-syntactic features in noun phrase production: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 907-922.
32. Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition in the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 147-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
34. Morrison, C.M., & Ellis, A.W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. J ournal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 116-133.
35. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
36. Morton, J. (1964). A preliminary functional model for language behaviour. International Audiology, 3, 216-225.
37. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
38. Morton, J. (1970). Word recognition. In Morton, J. & Marshall, J.C. (Eds.). Psycholinguistics Volume 2 - Structures and Processes. London: Paul Elek.
39. Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing visible language 1. New York: Plenum.
40. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 416--424.
41. Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001a). The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 966--974.
42. Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001b). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 215--229, 2001.
43. Nakata H, Inui K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Sakamoto M, Kida T, Wasaka T & Kakigi R. (2004). Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation.Clin Neurophysiol 115(2): 361-368.
44. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Role of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 7,480-494.
45. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition- A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading. Visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., Matos R. (2001) Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet : LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
47. Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225-236.
48. O'Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1992). The optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance,
49. Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28-39.
50. Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., McDonald, J.E. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
51. Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In Coltheart, M. (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Perea, M. & Gotor, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short SOAs in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 67, 223-240.
53. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gomez, C. (2002). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30, 34-45.
54. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2003). Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: Evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 273-286.
55. Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the Reader. In P. Hagoort & C. Brown (Eds.), Neurocognition of language processing (pp. 167-208). Oxford University Press.
56. Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30(4), 473-485.
57. Perfetti, C.A., Bell, L.C., & Delaney, S. (1988). Automatic (pre-lexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
58. Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In H. S. R. Kao, C. K. Leong, & D.-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 36-60).  Hong Kong University of Press.
59. Perfetti, C.A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In David Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60. Peterson, R. & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 24, 539-557.
61. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). EEG's to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
62. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. (1999). The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1142-1158.
63. Posner, M.I., & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P.M.A. Rabbitt & S.Dornic (Eds.), Attention & Performance V. New York: Academic Press.
64. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W.S. (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time-course of perceptual, lexical and contextual processes. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 458-470
65. Rapp, B. & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
66. Ratcliff, R. & Smith, P.L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367.
67. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psuchological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
68. Reynvoet, B., Brysbaert, M., & Fias, W. (2002). Semantic priming in number naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1127-1139.
69. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
70. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
71. Sasaki, K., & Gemba, H. (1989). "No-go potential" in the prefrontal cortex of monkeys. In E. Basal & T. H. Bullock (Eds.), Brain dynamics, progress and perspectives (pp. 290-301). Heidelberg : Springer
72. Sasaki, K., & Gemba, H. (1986). Electrical activity in the prefrontal cortex specific to no-go reaction of conditioned hand movement in color discrimination in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 64, 603-606.
73. Sasaki, K., Gemba, H., Nambu, A., & Matsuzaki, R. (1993). No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects. Neuroscience Research, 18, 249-252.
74. Schmitt, B.M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., K., Kutas, M,. & Münte, T.F. (2001). Electrophysiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening words. Neuroscience Research, 41. 293-298.
75. Schmitt, B.M., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Kutas, M,. & Münte, T.F. (2001). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4). 510-522.
76. Schriefers, H & Jescheniak, J. D. (1999). Representation and processing of grammatical gender in language production: A review. Journal of psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 575-600.
77. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and language, 29, 86-102.
78. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
79. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
80. Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-79.
81. Spinelli, E., McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (2003). Processing Resyllabified Words in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 233-254.
82. Spinelli, E., Meunier, F, & Seigneuric, A. (2005). Does gender information influence early phases of spoken word recognition?27th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society July 21-23, Stresa: Italy.
83. Stone, G.O. & Van Orden, G.C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
84. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
85. Taft, M & Meunier, F. (1998). Lexical Representation of Gender: A Quasiregular Domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(1), 23-45.
86. Tanenhaus, M.K, & Lucas, M.M. (1987). Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition, 25, 213-234. Reprinted in U.H.Frauenfelder and L.K. Tyler (Eds.), Spoken Word Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. Tucker, G.R., Lambert, W.E. et Rigault, A. (1977). The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behaviour. Paris : Mouton.
88. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (1996). The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: Studies in language comprehension and production. Doctoral Dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press
89. Van Turennout, M.I., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1997).Electrophysiological evidence on time course on semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 787-806.
90. Van Turennout, M.I., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280 (5363), 572-574.
91. Van Turennout, M.I., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1999). The time course of grammatical and phonological processing during speaking: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28 (6), 649-676.
92. Vigliocco, G. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue: Psychology of. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Science . 23: 15759-62. Elsevier.
93. Vigliocco, G & Franck, J. (1999). When sex end syntax go hand in hand: Gender Agreement in Language Production. Journal of Memory and Language. 40, 455-478.
94. Vigliocco, G. & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound & syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin, 128 , 442-472.
95. Ziegler, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567-593.