Bibliographie

Note : Les références précédées d’une étoile désignent les quelques références incluses d’après citation annexe.

1. Aghababian, V. (1998). Acquisition de la lecture: Aspects développementaux et neuropsychologiques. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Faculté des sciences de Luminy, Marseille.
2. Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing Normal Reading Skills: Aspects of the Visual Processes Underlying Word Recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76(2), 123-150.
3. Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (1999). Nihongo-no Goi-Tokusei (Lexical properties of Japanese). Sanseido: Tokyo.
4. André-Salvini, B., Berthier, A., Geoffroy-Schneiter, B., & Zali, A. (2000). L'ABCdaire des écritures. Paris: Flammarion.
5. *Anglin, Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, serial n° 238, vol 58, n° 10.
6. Barry, C., & Gehrand, S. (2003). Both concreteness and age-of-acquisition affect reading accuracy but only concreteness affects comprehension in a deep dyslexic patient. Brain and Language, 84, 84-104.
7. Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375.
8. Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age-of-acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
9. Bates, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. Broman & J. M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (pp. 214-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Bates, E., Burani, C., D'Amico, S., & Barca, L. (2001). Word reading and picture naming in Italian. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 986-999.
11. Bear, M., Connors, B., & Paradiso, M. (2002). Introduction aux neurosciences, Neurosciences, à la découverte du cerveau. Rueil Malmaison, France: Pradel/Groupe Liaisons SA.
12. Benboutayab, N. (2004). Interaction des facteurs visuels et lexicaux au cours de la reconnaissance des mots écrits: l'effet de la position du regard. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
13. Bessou, A., Montlahuc, J. L., Fourneret, P., & Revol, O. (2005). Profil psychométrique de 245 enfants intellectuellement précoces au WISC-III. A.N.A.E., 81, 23-28.
14. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2000). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer., from http://www.praat.org.
15. Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456-476.
16. Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Meot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89-114.
17. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 469-489.
18. *Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.
19. *Bouma, H., & Legein, C. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69-80.
20. Brown, D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 208-216.
21. *Brown, S. W., & Hwang, M. T. (1991). Factor analysis of reponses to the WISC-R for gifted children. Psychological Repport, 69, 99-107.
22. Bruxelles, Grangette, Guinamard & Van der Veen. Linguistique Française 1: Langue écrite, langue orale. Documents et exercices. Support de cours édité par l'université Lyon 2. Non daté.
23. Brysbaert, M. (1996). Word frequency affects naming latency in Dutch when age of acquisition is controlled. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 185-193.
24. Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., & Van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from Dutch. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 65-85.
25. Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & de Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104(215-226).
26. Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10, 385-395.
27. Byrne, B. (1989). Etude expérimentale de la découverte des principes alphabétiques par l'enfant. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), L'apprenti lecteur (pp. 129-144). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Nieslé.
28. Caroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973a). Age of acquisition norms for 220 picturables nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 563-576.
29. Caroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973b). Word frequency and age-of-acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85-95.
30. Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer, B., & Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set 230 object names in French: Relationships with other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 209-245.
31. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (1999). Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 157-205.
32. Cohen, J., Mc Whinney, B., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope : An interacting graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods Instruments And Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
33. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A., et al. (2000). The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123(pt 2), 291-307.
34. Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., & Keating, C. (1988). Effect of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 1-12.
35. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex, une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le français écrit et parlé. L'année Psychologique, 90(551-566).
36. Content, A., & Radeau, M. (1988). Données stastistiques sur la structure orthographique du français. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, no hors-série, 1-87.
37. Dejerine, J. (1891). Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie, suivi d'autopsie. Mémoires de la Société Biologique, 3, 197-201.
38. Dejerine, J. (1892). Contributions à l'étude anatomopathologique et clinique des différentes variétés de cécité verbale. Mémoires de la Société Biologique, 44, 61-90.
39. Dendien J. & Pierrel J. M. (2003). Le trésor de la langue française informatisé. un exemple d’informatisation d’un dictionnaire de langue de référence. Traitement Automatique des langues, TAL, 44 n.2, 11-37.
40. Dewhurst, S. A., Hitch, J., & Barry, C. (1998). Separate Effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 284-298.
41. Dubois, J. Guespin L., Giacomo, M., Marcellesi C., Marcellesi, J.B. & Mével, J.P., (1994). Dictionnaire de linguistique et des sciences du langage . Paris : Larousse.
42. Ducrot, S., Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Pynte, J., & Billard, C. (2003). The Optimal Viewing Position Effect in Beginning and Dyslexic Readers. Special Issue on Language Disorders and Reading Acquisition, 1(10).
43. Ehri, L. C. (1989). Apprendre à lire et à écrire les mots. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), L'apprenti lecteur (pp. 103-128). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Nieslé.
44. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
45. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 47-65.
46. Ellis, A. W., & Lambon-Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems : Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 1103-1123.
47. Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 515-523.
48. French, R. M. (1999). Catastrophic Forgetting in Connectionist Networks: Causes, Consequences and Solutions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 128-135.
49. Fourneret, P. (2003). L'enfant précoce de l'intelligence en général à la précocité en particulier. A.N.A.E, 73, 132-138.
50. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301-330). London: Erlbaum.
51. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71-99.
52. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104-115.
53. Fushimi, T., Mutsuo, I., Patterson, K., & Tatsumi, I. F. (1999). Consistency, Frequency, and Lexicality Effects in Naming Japanese Kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 382-407.
54. Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-Acquisition, Word Frequency, and Neighborhood Density Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Children and Adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 468–492.
55. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 267-283.
56. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999a). -of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming. Cognition, 73, B27-36.
57. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999b). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 592-602.
58. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (2000). When does a deep dyslexic make a semantic error? The roles of age-of-acquisition, concreteness, and frequency. Brain & Language, 74(1), 26-47.
59. Geschwind, N. (1965). Disconnection syndromes in animals and man. Brain, 88, 237-294.
60. Ghyselinck, M., Custers, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). The Effect of Age of Acquisition in Visual Word Processing: Further Evidence for the Semantic Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 550–554.
61. Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115, 43–67.
62. Gombert, J. E., & Colé, P. (2003). Activités métalinguistiques, lecture et illetrisme. In M. Kail & M. Fayol (Eds.), L’acquisition du langage. Le langage en développement au-delà de trois ans (pp. 117-149): PUF.
63. Gough, P., & Juel, C. (1989). Les premières étapes de la reconnaissance des mots. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), L'apprenti lecteur (pp. 85-102). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Nieslé.
64. Grégoire, J. (2000). L'évaluation clinique de l'intelligence de l'enfant. Liège: Margada.
65. Halpern, J. (2001). The Kodansha Kanji learner's dictionary. New York: Kodansha International.
66. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, Reading Acquisition, and Dyslexia: Insights from Connectionist Models. Psychological Review, 3, 491-528.
67. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662-720.
68. Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages. Psicológica, 23, 245-281.
69. Jacobs, A. M., Nazir, T. A., & Heller, O. (1989). Letter perception in peripheral vision: a temporal discrimination matrix using eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 95-102.
70. Jambaqué, I. (2004). Contribution de la neuropsychologie développementale à l’étude des sujets à haut potentiel. In J. Sous la direction de Lautrey (Ed.), L'état de la recherche sur les enfants dits "surdoués" (pp. 48-60). Paris: CNRS UMR 8605.
71. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
72. Joffe, A. H. (2002). The rise of the secondary states in the iron age levant. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 45(4), 425-467.
73. Kajii, N., & Osaka, N. (2000). Optimal viewing position in vertically and horizontally presented Japanese words. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(8), 1634-1644.
74. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R. J., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 862–885.
75. Kello, C. T., & Kawamoto, A. H. (1998). Runword: An IBMPC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming responses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 371-381.
76. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171.
77. Kindaichi, K., Shibata, T., Yamada, A., & Yamada, T. (1989). Shin-Meikai Kokugo Jiten (ver. 4). Sanseido: Tokyo.
78. Landercy, A., & Renard, R. (1977). Eléments de phonétique. Mons (Be): Centre international de phonétique appliquée.
79. Lefavrais, P. (1965). Test de l'Alouette. Paris: E.C.P.A.
80. Lété, B. (2003). Building the mental lexicon by exposure to print: A corpus-based analysis of French reading books. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon. "Some words to talk about words" (pp. 187-214). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publisher.
81. Lété, B. (2004). Le lexique des manuels scolaires de lecture. Implications pour l'estimation du vocabulaire des enfants de 6 à 11 ans. In E. Calaque & J. David (Eds.), Didactique du lexique : Contextes, démarches, supports (pp. 241-257). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
82. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 156-166.
83. Lewis, M. B. (1999a). Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance based account? Cognition, 71, B23-B39.
84. Lewis, M. B. (1999b). Are age-of-acquisition effects cumulative-frequency effects in disguise? A reply to Moore, Valentine and Turner. Cognition, 72(3), 311-316.
85. Lewis, M. B., Chadwick, A. J., & Ellis, H. D. (2002). Exploring a neural-network account of age-of-acquisition effects using repetition priming of faces. Memory & Cognition, 30(8), 1228-1237.
86. Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S., & Ellis, H. D. (2001). Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects : Are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? Cognition, 78(2), 189-205.
87. *Marcus, M., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19, 313–330.
88. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 199-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
89. Martinet, C., Valdois, S., & Fayol, M. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of literacy acquisition. Cognition, 91(2), B11-22.
90. *Massaro, D. W., & Klitzke, D. (1977). Letters are functional in word identification. Memory & Cognition, 5, 292-298.
91. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of contexts effect in letter perception. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-44.
92. McClelland, J. L., Thomas, A., McCandliss, B. D., & Fiez, J. A. (1999). Understanding Failures of Learning: Hebbian Learning, Competition for Representational Space, and Some Preliminary Experimental Data. In J. Reggia, E. Ruppin & D. Glanzman (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research. Disorders of Brain, Behavior and Cognition: The Neurocomputational Perspective (Vol. 121, pp. 75-80). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
93. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 245-253.
94. Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. (2002). Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 30(2), 262-269.
95. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002a). Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing, 15, 759-788.
97. Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002b). What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 183-206.
98. Montant, M., Nazir, T. A., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Neuropsychology, 15(1-2), 93-140.
99. Morris, P. E. (1981). Age of acquisition, imagery, recall, and the limitations of multiple-regression analysis. Memory & Cognition, 9, 277-282.
100. Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of objects names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(3), 528-559.
101. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 91, 116-133.
102. Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affect object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 705-714.
103. Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 435 - 459.
104. Munakata, Y., & McClelland, J. L. (2003). Connectionist models of development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 413-429.
105. Nazir, T. A. (1991). On the role of refixations in letter strings: the influence of oculomotor factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 373-389.
106. Nazir, T. A. (1993). On the relation between the optimal and the preferred viewing position in words during reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception & Cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 349 - 361). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
107. Nazir, T. A. (2000). Traces of print along the visual pathway. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 3-23). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
108. Nazir, T. A., Benboutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2004). Reading Habits, Perceptual Learning, and Recognition of Printed Words. Brain & Language, 88(3), 294-311.
109. Nazir, T. A., Decoppet, N., & Aghababian, V. (2003). On the origins of age–of–acquisition effects in the perception of printed words. Developmental Science, 6(2), 143-150.
110. Nazir, T. A., Heller, D., & Sussman, C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 315-328.
111. Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 810-821.
112. Nazir, T. A., & O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system. Spatial Vision, 5, 81-100.
113. Nazir, T. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
114. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462.
115. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: what matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281-1303.
116. *Olzak, L. A., & Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (Vol. II, pp. 7:1-7:56). New York: Wiley.
117. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: a lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(2), 376-379.
118. *Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7, 273–282.
119. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding Normal and ImpairedWord Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-Regular Domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
120. Poldrack, R. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1998). The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. Cerebral Cortex, 8(1), 1-10.
121. Price, C. J., Moore, C. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). The anatomy of language: contributions from fuctional neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 3, 40-52.
122. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. J., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2000). Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6(3), 207-213.
123. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31-74.
124. Reichenbach, D., & Mayer, G. (1977). Dubois-Buyse d'orthographe usuelle française. Paris: OCDL.
125. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
126. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94.
127. Seymour, P. H. K., & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 1-37.
128. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2004). Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55(9), 926-933.
129. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2002). Disruption of Posterior Brain Systems for Reading inChildren with Developmental Dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101-110.
130. Shibahara, N., Zorzi, M., Hill, M. P., Wydell, T., & Butterworth, B. (2003). Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56(2), 263 - 286.
131. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Bechennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84(3), 194-217.
132. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., & Bonnet, P. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: the role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(2), 134-165.
133. Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Bowers, J. S., & Damian, M. F. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: evidence from expert vocabularies. Cognition, 93(1), B11-26.
134. Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 215-246.
135. Steyvers, M. S., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(1), 41-78.
136. Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 2860-2865.
137. Temple, E., Poldrack, R. A., Protopapas, A., Nagarajan, S., Salz, T., Tallal, P., et al. (2000). Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 13907–13912.
138. Turkeltaub, P. E., Flowers, D. L., Verbalis, A., Miranda, M., Gareau, L., & Eden, G. F. (2004). The neural basis of hyperlexic reading: An fMRI case study. Neuron, 41, 11-25.
139. Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767-773.
140. Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1282-1291.
141. Wechsler, D. (1996). Manuel de l’Echelle d’Intelligence pour Enfants. Troisième Edition. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
142. Xing, H., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of character acquisition in Chinese. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
143. Yamada, J. (1992). Why are kana words named faster than kanji words? Brain and Language, 43(4), 682-693.
144. Yamada, J. (1998). The time course of semantic and phonological access in naming kanji and kana words. Reading and Writing, 10(3-5), 425-437.
145. Yamasaki, M., Ellis, A. W., Morrison, C. M., & Lambon-Ralph, M. A. (1997). Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 407-421.
146. Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain & Language, 24, 326-358.
147. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.
148. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 31-38.
149. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2005). Connectionist Models in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience: Critical Periods and the Paradox of Success. In Y. Munakata & M. Johnson (Eds.), Attention & Performance XXI: Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Oxford University Press.