Bibliographie

  1. Aadmodt, A. & Plaza, E. (1994). Cased Based Reasoning : Foundational issues, methodological variations , and system approaches. AICOM, 7,.39-59.
  2. Ahn, W., Brewer, W. F., & Mooney, R. J. (1992). Schema acquisition from a single example. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 391-412.
  3. Ainsworth, S. & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of selfexplaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
  4. Ainsworth, S. E., Wood, D., & O'Malley, C. (1998). There is more than one way to solve a problem: Evaluating a learning environment that supports the development of children's multiplication skills. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 141-157.
  5. Aka, M. & Frasson, C. (2002). A New Approach on Flight Training: ASIMIL. In Proceedings of international symposium TICE 2002, Lyon, France, 307–314.
  6. Aleven, V. (2003). Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artificial Intelligence, 150, 183-237.
  7. Aleven et Ashley, (1997). Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. ICAIL 1997: 170-179.
  8. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An Effective Meta-cognitive Strategy: Learning by Doing and Explaining with a Computer-Based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26 (2), 147-179.
  9. Aleven, V., K. R. Koedinger, and K. Cross (1999). Tutoring answer explanation fosters learning with understanding. In Proceedings of AIED-99, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 199-206.
  10. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press,
  11. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A.T., & Lewis, M.W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7-49.
  12. Anderson, J.R., Farrell, R. & Sauers, R. (1984). Learning to Program in Lisp. Cognitive Science, 8, 87-129.
  13. Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. G., & Beasley, C. M. (1979). A general learning theory and its applications to schema abstraction. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 13, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 277-318.
  14. Arroyo, I., Beck, J. E., Woolf, B. P., Beal, C. R., & Schultz, K. (2000). Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In G. Gauthier & C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference ITS 2000 (1839) Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 574-583.
  15. Atkinson, R.K. & Catrambone, R. (2000). Subgoal learning and the effect of conceptual vs. computational equations on transfer. In: L.R. Gleitman & A.K. Joshi (eds), Proceedings of the 22th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum, 591–596.
  16. Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D.W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181-214.
  17. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  18. Bain W. (1986). Cased-base reasoning: A comuter model of subjective assessment, PhD Thesis. Yale University.
  19. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. (2004). Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2004), Maceio, Brasil, Springer, 531-540.
  20. Balacheff, N. (1994a). Didactique et intelligence artificielle. In Balacheff, N. & Vivet, M. (eds.), Didactique et intelligence artificielle, La pensée sauvage éditions, Grenoble, 7-42.
  21. Balacheff, N. (1994b). La transposition informatique, un nouveau problème pour la didactique des mathématiques, In Artigue et al. (eds.), Vingt ans de didactique des mathématiques en France, La pensée sauvage éditions, Grenoble, 364-370.
  22. Balacheff, N. (2002). Contribution à la réflexion sur la recherche sur les Environnement Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain. In Baron G.-L. et Bruillard E. (eds.), Les technologies en éducation : Perspectives de recherches et questions vives,.Paris : INRP-MSH-IUFM de Basse Normandie, 193-201.
  23. Bannert M. (2002). Managing cognitive load – recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction 12(1), 139-146.
  24. Baron M., Gras R., & Nicaud, J.F. (1991). Introduction. In Baron M., Nicaud J.F. (eds.), In actes des deuxièmes journées EIAO de Cachan, Editions de l’ENS de Cachan, 7-8.
  25. Bassok, M. (1990). Transfert of domain-specific problem-solving procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 522-533.
  26. Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K.J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition. 15, 153-166.
  27. Bassok, M., Wu, L.L., & Olseth, K.L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory and Cognition (23), 354-367.
  28. Barfurth, M.A., Basque, J., Chomienne, M. & Winer, L.R. (1994). Les instruments de collecte de données de recherche qualitative dans des environnements pédagogiques informatisés. In Bordeleau, P. (eds.), Apprendre dans des environnements pédagogiques informatisés, Editions Logiques, 485-548.
  29. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  30. Bastien, C. & Scapin, D. (1993). Critères ergonomiques pour l'évaluation des interfaces utilisateurs, RT n°156, INRIA.
  31. Beck, J.E. (2004). Using response times to model student disengagement. In Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2004), Maceio, Brasil, 13-20.
  32. Béguin P. & Rabardel P. (2000). Concevoir des activités instrumentées. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 14, 35-54.
  33. Bélanger, S., Thibodeau, M.-A. & Aïmeur, E: (1999). Training of the Learner in Criminal Law by Case-Based Reasoning. In Twelve International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems (IEA/AIE-99), Cairo, Egypt, 398-408.
  34. Bernardo, A.B. (2001). Principle explanation and strategic schema abstraction in problem solving. Memory & cognition, 29 (4), 627-633
  35. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. & Brown, A.L. (1995). Training in self explanation and self-regulation strategies: investigating the effect of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
  36. Blessing, S. B. & Ross, B. H. (1996). Content Effects in Problem Categorization and Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22 , 792-810.
  37. Brousseau (1998). Théorie des situations didactiques, Grenoble, La Pensée Sauvage.
  38. Brown, A.L., & Kane, M.J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
  39. Bruillard, E. (1997). Les machines à enseigner Paris, Hermès.
  40. Burke, R. & Kass, A. (1996). Retrieving stories for Cased-Based Teaching. In leake, D. (ed.), Cased Based Reasoning : Experiences, Lessons, and future directions, Menlo Park : AAAI Press/MIT Press, 93-110.
  41. Capus, L. & Tourigny, L. (2000). Le raisonnement à partir de cas : une aide à la formation en analyse de sécurité routière. In Proceedings of international symposium TICE 2000, Troyes, France, 227–235.
  42. Carbonell, J. G. (1983). Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalizing plans from past experience. In R. Michalsky, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Press.
  43. Carrol, W. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360-367.
  44. Catrambone, R. (1994). Improving examples to improve transfer to novel problem. Memory & Cognition, 22, 606-615.
  45. Catrambone, R. (1995). Aiding subgoal learning: Effect on transfers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 5-17.
  46. Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1020-1031.
  47. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model and problem-solving transfer: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355–376.
  48. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitation on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
  49. Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. & Didierjean, A. (1999). Raisonnement par analogie et généralisation des connaissances, In G. Netchine-Grynberg (Ed.), Développement et fonctionnement cognitif : vers une intégration, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 125-152.
  50. Caverni, J.P. (1988). La verbalisation comme source d'observables pour l'étude du fonctionnement cognitif. In Caverni, J.P., Bastien, C., Mendelsohn, P. & Tiberghien, G. (eds.), Psychologie cognitive, modèles et methodes, Presse Universitaire de Grenoble, 253- 273.
  51. Champin, P.A., Prié, Y., & Mille A. (2004). MUSETTE: a Framework for Knowledge Capture from Experience In EGC'04, Clermont Ferrand, France.
  52. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
  53. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233-246.
  54. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
  55. Chase, W.G. & Simon, H.A. (1973). Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
  56. Chen, Z. & Mo, L. (2004). Schema induction in problem solving: A multidimensional analysis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 , 583-600
  57. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, R., Reimann, P.& Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems, Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
  58. Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H. & La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science , 18, 439-477.
  59. Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
  60. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. & Rees, E. (1982).Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. S. (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, 1, Hillsdale , NJ Erlbaum, , 1-75.
  61. Conati C. & VanLehn K. (1999). Teaching meta-cognitive skills: implementation and evaluation of a tutoring system to guide self-explanation while learning from examples. In Proceedings of, 9th World Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Education (AIED '99), Le Mans, France. 
  62. Conati C. & VanLehn K. (2000). Toward Computer-Based Support of Meta-Cognitive Skills: a Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 389-415.
  63. Cooke, N.J., Atlas, R.S., Lane, D.M. & Berger, R. C. (1993). Role of High-Level Knowledge in Memory for Chess Positions. American Journal of Psychology, 106 , 321-351.
  64. Cooper, G. & Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
  65. Cottier P., Choquet C. (2005). De l'usager construit à l'usager participant. In actes de EIAH’2005, Montpellier, France, 449-454.
  66. Cummins, D. (1992). Role of analogical reasoning in the induction of problem categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 1103-1124.
  67. Damm R. (1992). Apprentissage des problèmes additifs et compréhension de texte. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.
  68. Decortis, F., Daele, L., Polazzi, L., Rizzo, A. & Saudelli, B. (2001). Nouveaux instruments actifs et activités narratives. Revue d’interactions homme-machine, 2(2), 1-30.
  69. De Croock, M.B.M., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). High vs. low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behaviour, 14, 249–267.
  70. De Graef, P., Christaens, D., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptuals effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317-329.
  71. De Jong, G.F., & Mooney, R. (1986). Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning, 1, 145-176.
  72. Delozanne, E. (1992). Explications en EIAO : études à partir d'ELISE, un logiciel pour entraîner à une méthode de calcul de primitives.Thèse de doctorat, Université du Maine,Le mans.
  73. Dessus, P. (2002). Description et prescription dans les méthodes de recherche en éducation. In Marcel J.-F. (Eds), Les sciences de l’éducation, des recherches, une discipline, Paris, L’harmattan.
  74. Didierjean, A (2001). Apprendre à partir d'exemples: Abstraction de règles et/ou mémoire d'exemplaires ? L'Année Psychologique, 101, 325-348.
  75. Didierjean, A. (2003). Is case-based reasoning a source of knowledge generalization ? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 435-453.
  76. Didierjean, A. & Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. (1998). Reasoning by analogy : Is it schema mediated or case-based? European Journal of Educational Psychology, 13 , 385-398.
  77. Didierjean, A., Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. & Savina, Y. (1999). Learning from examples: Case-based reasoning in chess for novices. Current Psychology of Cognition, 18 , 337-361.
  78. Didierjean, A., Ferrari, V., & Marmèche, E. (2004). L’expertise cognitive au jeu d’échec : quoi de neuf depuis De groot (1946) ? L'Année Psychologique, 104, 771-793.
  79. Dubourg, X. & Teutsch, P. (1997). Interface Design Issues in Interactive Learning Environments. In Proceedings of IFIP WG 3.3 Working Conference, Human-Computer Interaction and Educational Tools, Sozopol.
  80. Dubourg, X., Delozanne, E. & Grugeon, B. (1995). Situations d'interaction dans un environnement d'apprentissage : le système Repères. In actes des Quatrièmes Journées EIAO de Cachan, Paris, Eyrolles eds, 223-244.
  81. Duclosson, N., Jean-Daubias, S., Riot, S. (2005). AMBRE-enseignant : un module partenaire de l’enseignant pour créer des problèmes. In Actes de EIAH’2005, Montpellier, 353-358.
  82. Duclosson N. (2004). Représentation des connaissances dans l’EIAH AMBRE-add. In Proceedings of international symposium TICE 2004, Compiègne, 164-171.
  83. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving, Part I: The structure and dynamics of problem-solving processes. Psychological Monographs, 58, 5, n°270.
  84. Elio, R., & Anderson, J.R. (1983). Effects of category generalization and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 113, 541-555.
  85. Ellman, T. (1989). Explanation-Based Learning: Explanation-Based Learning: A Survey of Programs and Perspectives. Computing Surveys 21(2), 163-221.
  86. Fayol, M. (1990). L’enfant et le nombre, Neuchatel, Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé.
  87. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples, Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
  88. Farenc, N. (1997). ERGOVAL : Une méthode de structuration des règles ergonomiques permettant l’évaluation automatique d’interfaces graphiques. Thèse de doctorat en informatique, Université Toulouse I.
  89. Fasse, B.B., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Evaluating Classroom Practices Using Qualitative Research Methods: Defining and Refining the Process. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences93-198.
  90. Fisher, J.-P. (1979). La perception des problèmes soustractifs aux débuts de l’apprentissage de la soustraction. Thèse de doctorat en Didactique des Mathématiques, Université Nancy 1.
  91. Fisher, J.-P. (1993). La résolution des problèmes arithmétiques verbaux : propositions pour un enseignement proactif. Annales de didactique et de sciences cognitives, 5, IREM de Strasbourg, 177-210.
  92. Frasson, C. (1998). Using cognitive agents for building pedagogical strategies in multistrategic intelligent tutoring system. In actes de la deuxième journée Acteurs, Agents et Apprentissage,Bayonne.
  93. Fuchs, B., Lieber, J., Mille, A., et Napoli, A. (1999). Towards a unified theory of adaptation in Case-Based Reasoning. In Proceedings of the third International conference on Case-based Reasoning (ICCBR-99), Lecture notes in Artificial Intelligence, Germany, Springer Verlag.
  94. Funk P. & Conlan O. (1988). Case-Based Reasoning to Improve Adaptability of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning for Education and Training, CBRET’2002, Aberdeen, Scotland, 15-23.
  95. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. (1988). Principles of instructional design, New York, Holt, Renhart and Winston Eds.
  96. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science, 32, 33-58.
  97. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure Mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
  98. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning, In Vosniadou S. & Ortony A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, New York, Cambridge University Press, 199-241.
  99. Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
  100. Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J.(1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer, Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
  101. Gick, M.L., & McGarry, S.J. (1992). Learning from mistakes: Inducing analogous solution failures to a source problem produces later successes in analogical transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 623-639.
  102. Gick, M.L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema induction and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 539-550.
  103. Gilbert, J.E. (2000). Case-Based Reasoning Applied to Instruction Method Selection for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Workshop Case-Based Reasoning in Intelligent Training Systems, ITS'2000, Montreal, 11-15.
  104. Gilly, M., Roux, J.-P. & Trognon A. (1999). Apprendre dans l’Interaction : analyse des médiations sémiotiques. Presses Universitaires de Nancy et Publications de l’Université de Provence.
  105. Gineste, M. D. (1997). Analogie et Cognition, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France.
  106. Gobet, F. (1998). Chess players’ thinking revisited. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 18-32.
  107. Gobet, F., & Simon, H.A. (1996a). Recall of random and distorted chess positions: implications for the theory of expertise. Memory & Cognition, 24, 493-503.
  108. Gobet, F., & Simon, H.A. (1996b). Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1-40.
  109. Greeno, J.G. & Riley, M.S. (1987). Processes and development of understanding. In Weinert F.E. & Kluwe R.H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding, Chap 10, 289-313.
  110. Gregori N., Hautecouverture J-C., GodartC. & Charoy, F. (2004). Ergonomie, culture, scénario, trois facteurs pour la conception d’une plate-forme de coopération. RSTI-RIA, 19 (1-2), 215-234.
  111. Guin D. (1991). La notion d'opérateur dans une modélisation cognitive de la compréhension des problèmes additifs. Math. Inf. Sci. Hum. (113), 5-33.
  112. Guin-Duclosson, N. (1999). Syrclad : une architecture de résolveurs de problèmes permettant d'expliciter des connaissances de classification, reformulation et résolution. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 13(2), 225-282.
  113. Guin-Duclosson, N., Jean-Daubias, S. & Nogry, S. (2002). The Ambre ILE: How to Use Case-Based Reasoning to Teach Methods. In proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’2002), Biarritz, France, Springer, 782-791.
  114. Hammond, K.J. (1990). Explaining and Repairing Plans That Fail. Artificial Intelligence, 45, 173-228.
  115. Hautecouverture J.-C., Grégori N., Paquelin D., Charoy F., Godart C., Patten M. & Faugeras I. (2004). Analyse d’usage d’une plate-forme de coopération : Usage et développement logiciel. Cahiers romans de sciences cognitives, 1(3), 45-77.
  116. Héraud, J.-M. (2002). Pixed : towards the sharing and the re-use of experience to assist training. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia,Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, USA, 777-782.
  117. Hoecker, D. & Elias, G. (1986). User evaluation of the LISP intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the human factors society, 32(3), 313-324.
  118. Holyoak, K.J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, (2), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  119. Holyoak, K.J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340.
  120. Holyoak, K.J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction, Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
  121. Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  122. Howell, D.C. (1998). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines, Paris, éditions De Boeck universités.
  123. Hû, O., & Trigano, P. (1998). Propositions de critères d’évaluation de l’interface homme-machine des logiciels multimédias pédagogiques. In proceedings of IHM’98, Nantes.
  124. Hudson, J. (1988). Children's memory for atypical actions in script-based stories: Evidence for a disruption effect, Journal of Experimental child psychology, 46, 159-173.
  125. Hudson, J., Fivush, R., Kuebly, J. (1992). Scripts and episodes: The development of event memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 483-505.
  126. Hummel, J. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping, Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
  127. Jean, S. (2000). Application de recommandations ergonomiques : spécificités des EIAO dédiés à l'évaluation. In Actes des Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en IHM 2000, 39-42.
  128. Jean-Daubias, S. (2004). De l'intégration de chercheurs, d'experts, d'enseignants et d'apprenants à la conception d'EIAH. In Proceedings of international symposium TICE’2004, Compiègne, 290-297.
  129. Joiron, C. & Leclet, D.(2003). Inciting discussions between physicans about clinical cases: The Diacom forum and its pairing module. In Proceedings of Conference on Open and Online Learning, ICOOL 2003, Ile Maurice.
  130. Jonshon, H.M. & Seifert, C.M. (1992). The Role of Predictive Features in Retrieving Analogical Cases. Journal of Memory and Language, 31 , 648-667.
  131. Kaplan, C.A., & Simon, H.A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374-419.
  132. Keane, M.T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: a comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18 , 387-438.
  133. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
  134. Kieras D.E. & Bovair S. (1986). The Acquisition of Procedures from Text: A Production System Analysis of Transfer of Training. Journal of Memory and Language, 25 , 507-375.
  135. Khan, T.M.: Case-Based Evaluation for Student Modelling. Workshop 5: Case-Based Reasoning in Intelligent Training Systems, ITS’2000, Montreal, 16-22.
  136. Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-Based Reasoning, San Mateo, Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
  137. Kolodner, J. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-Based Reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 35-44.
  138. Le Calvez F., Giroire, H., Duma, J., Tisseau, G. & Urtasun, M. (2004). Utilisation d'un logiciel pour apprendre une méthode dans le cadre d'une UE de méthodologie en DEUG. In proceedings of Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication dans les Enseignements d'Ingénieurs et dans l'Industrie (TICE2004) Compiègne, 115-120.
  139. Le Calvez, F.; Urtasun, M.; Tisseau, G.; Giroire, H.; & Duma, J. (1997). Les machines à construire : des interfaces pour apprendre une méthode constructive de dénombrement. In Baron, Mendelsohn, and Nicaud (eds), actes des 5èmes Journées francophones EIAO, Hermès, 49-60.
  140. LeFevre, J.A. & Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instruction need examples? Cognition and Instruction, 3, 1-30.
  141. Lewis, C., Polson, P.G., Wharton, C. & Rieman J. (1990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In Chew, J .C., & Schneiderman J. Whiteside (eds.), CHI'90: Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, 235-242.
  142. Litmann, D. & Soloway, E. (1988). Evaluating ITSs: The cognitive science perspective. In M. Polson and J. J. Richardson (eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  143. Long, J. (2000). Psychologie cognitive et ergonomie cognitive, deux approches des systèmes complexes. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 14, 13-34.
  144. Luckin R. & Du Boulay B., (1999). Ecolab : the development and evaluation of a vygotskian design framework. International journal of artificial Intelligence in Education. 10, 198-220.
  145. Mark, M., & Greer, J. E. (1995). The VCR tutor: Effective instruction for device operation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 209-246.
  146. Marmèche, E., & Didierjean, A. (2001). Is generalization conservative ? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 475-49
  147. Masterton, S. (1997). The Virtual Participant: Lessons to be Learned from a Case-Based Tutor's Assistant. In proceedings of International conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Toronto, 179-186.
  148. Marthe P. (1982). Problèmes de type additif et appropriation par l'élève des groupes additifs Z et D entiers relatifs et décimaux relatifs. Thèse de doctorat, EHESS, Paris.
  149. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press.
  150. Mayer, R.E. & Moreno R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
  151. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
  152. Michalsky, R. S. (1983). Theory and methodology of inductive learning. In R. S. Michalsky, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Press.
  153. Mille A. (1998). Associer expertise et expérience pour assister les tâches de l'utilisateur, Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon1.
  154. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
  155. Minsky M. A. (1975). Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. Winston (ed), The psychology of computer vision, New York, McGraw-Hill, 211–277.
  156. Mitchell, T.M., Keller, R. & Kedar-Kabelli, S. (1986). Explanation-Based Generalization: A Unifying View. Machine Learning, 1, 47-80.
  157. Mooney, R. J. (1990). Learning plan schemata from observation: Explanation-based learning from plan recognition, Cognitive Science, 14, 483-509.
  158. Mostow J. & Tedesco, P. (eds) (2004). Proceedings of Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2004), Maceio, Brasil, 13-20.
  159. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Beck, J.E., Chalasani, R., Cuneo, A., Jia, P., & Kadaru, K. (2002) A La Recherche du Temps Perdu, or As Time Goes By: Where does the time go in a Reading Tutor that listens? In proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2002), Biarritz, France, Springer-Verlag,
  160. Needham, D., & Begg, I. (1990). Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory oriented training promotes memory for training. Memory & Cognition, 19, 543-557.
  161. Neuman, Y., & Schwarz, B.B. (1998). Is self-explanation while solving problems helpful? The case of analogical problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 15–24.
  162. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press.
  163. Nielsen, J. & Landauer, T.K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 206-213.
  164. Nogry, S. (2001). Validation d’un EIAH fondé sur le raisonnement à partir de cas pour l’enseignement de méthodes. Rapport de DEA rapport de recherche du LIRIS RR-2004-032.
  165. Nogry, S. & Didierjean, A. (soumis). Apprendre à partir d’exemples : interactions entre présentation du matériel, activités des apprenants et processus cognitifs.
  166. Nogry, S., Jean-Daubias, S., & Duclosson, N. (2004). ITS evaluation in classroom: the case of the Ambre ITS. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2004), Maceio, Brasil, Springer, 511-520.
  167. Nogry, S., Jean-Daubias, S. & Guin-Duclosson N. (2002). La psychologie cognitive au service de la conception de l’environnement d’apprentissage AMBRE. In Proceedings of international symposium TICE 2002, Lyon, France, 195-202.
  168. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14(3), 510-520.
  169. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
  170. Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429-434.
  171. Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
  172. Papert, S. (1987). Microworlds : transforming Education. In Lawler R. & Yazdani M. (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education: learning environments and tutoring systems. 1, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 79-94.
  173. Patalano, A.L. & Seifert, C.M. (1994). Memory for impasses during problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 22 , 234-242.
  174. Perriault, J. (1989). La logique de l'usage, essai sur les machines à communiquer, Flammarion.
  175. Pirolli, P., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 240-272.
  176. Pirolli, P. & Recker, M. (1994). Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 235-275.
  177. Pollock, E., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2002) Assimilating complex information, Learning and Instruction 12, 61–86.
  178. PRC-IA 97. Conception d’Environnements Interactifs d’Apprentissage avec Ordinateur. Tendances et perspectives. Contribution du groupe EIAO coordonnée par Balacheff N., Baron M., Desmoulins C., Grandbastien M., Vivet M., In Actes des journées nationales du PRC IA, 1997, Grenoble, 315-338.
  179. Quilici, J. H. & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 325-342.
  180. Quilici, J.L., & Mayer, R.E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161.
  181. Rabardel P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris, Colin.
  182. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
  183. Recker, M., & Pirolli, P. (1995). Modelling individual differences in students' learning strategies. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 1-38.
  184. Reed, S.K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 124-139.
  185. Reed, S.K. (1989). Constraints on the abstraction of solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 532-540.
  186. Reed, S.K., & Bolstad, C.A. (1991). Use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 753-766.
  187. Reeves, L.M., & Weisberg, R.W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 381-400.
  188. Reingold, E.M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M. & Stampe, D.M. (2001). Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence from Eye Movements. Psychological Science, 12, 49-56.
  189. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
  190. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and instruction 12, 529-556.
  191. Renkl A., & Atkinson, R. (2003). Structuring the transition from examples to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: a cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15-22.
  192. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K. & Grobe, C.S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps work – A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32, 59-82.
  193. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K., & Maier U.H. (2000). From studying examples to solving problems: Fading worked-out solution steps helps learning. In Gleitman L. & Joshi A.K.(Eds.), Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 393-398.
  194. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293-316.
  195. Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90-108.
  196. Riesbeck, C., & Schank, R. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  197. Riley M.S, Greeno J.G. & Heller J.I. (1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In Ginsburg H.P. (Ed.) The development of mathemtical thinking. New-York : Academic Press.
  198. Robert, A., Rogalski, J. & Samurçay R. (1987). Enseigner des méthodes. Les cahiers de didactique, 38. IREM de Paris 7 ed., Paris.
  199. Rogalski M. (1990). Enseigner des méthodes en mathématiques. Commission Inter-Irem Université, Enseigner autrement les mathématiques en Deug A première année, bulletin Inter-Irem, 65-79.
  200. Rogalski, M. (1994). Les concepts de l'EIAO sont-ils indépendants du domaine? L'exemple d'enseignement de méthodes en analyse. Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques, 14 (1/2), 43-66.
  201. Ross, B.H. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 371-416.
  202. Ross, B.H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
  203. Ross, B.H. (1989a). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468.
  204. Ross B. H. (1989b). Remindings in Learning and Instruction, In Vosniadou S. & Ortony A. (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning,. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  205. Ross, B.H., & Bradshaw, G.L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings. Memory & Cognition, 22, 591-605.
  206. Ross, B.H., & Kennedy, P.T. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 42-55.
  207. Ross, B. H., & Kilbane, M. C (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 427-440.
  208. Rouet, J.-F., & Passerault, J.-M (1999). Analyzing learner hypermedia interaction: An overview of online methods. Instructional Science, 27, 201–219.
  209. Rumelhart, D.E. & Norman, D.A. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  210. Sander, E. (2000). L’analogie, du naïf au creative, Paris, l’Harmattan.
  211. Sander, E., & Richard, J. F. (1997). Analogical transfer as guided by an abstraction process: the case of learning by doing in text editing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1459-1483.
  212. Sander, E., Levrat, B., Brissiaud, R., Porcheron, P., Richard, R. (2003). Conceptualisation et propriétés sémantiques des situations dans la résolution de problèmes arithmétiques : rapport d’étape. Ministère de la Recherche ; appel d’offre 2002 Ecole et Sciences Cognitives : les apprentissages et leurs dysfonctionnements.
  213. Schank, R.C. (1982). Dynamic memory, a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  214. Schank, R.C. (1999). Dynamic Memory Revisited, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  215. Schank, R.C., and Abelson R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  216. Schank, R., & Edelson, D. (1990). A Role for AI in Education: Using Technology to Reshape Education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1.2, 3-20.
  217. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving, New York, Academic Press.
  218. Schneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
  219. Schoenfeld, A. H. & Hermann, D. J. (1982). Problem Perception and Knowledge Structure in Expert and Novice Mathematical Problem Solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8(5), 484-494.
  220. Senach, B. (1993). L'évaluation ergonomique des interfaces homme-machine. In J.-C. Sperandio (ed.), L'ergonomie dans la conception des projets informatiques,.. Octares editions, 69-122.
  221. Shiri, A., Aimeur E., & Frasson C. (1988). SARA: A Cased-Based Student Modelling System. Fourth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1488, Dublin, Ireland, 425-436.
  222. Shute, V. J., & Glaser, R. (1990). A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 51-77.
  223. Shute, V.J., & Regian, J.W. (1993). Principles for evaluating Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 4 (2/3), 245-271.
  224. Silver, E. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for research in mathematics education, 10(3),  195-210.
  225. Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems. Journal for research in mathematics education, 12(1), 54-64.
  226. Soloway, E., Jackson, S.L., Klein, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S.J., Studer, S. (1996). Learning Theory in Practice: Case Studies of Learner-Centered Design. In Tauber, M.J., Bellotti, V., Jeffries, R., Mackinlay, J.D., Nielsen, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 96 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 189-196.
  227. Spencer, R., Weisberg, R. (1986). Context-Dependent Effects on Analogical Transfer. Memory and Cognition, vol. 14(5), pp. 442-449
  228. Squires, D., & Preece J. (1999). Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability, and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computer, 11 (5), 467-483.
  229. Stark, R., Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl A. (2002). Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learning and Instruction, 12, 39–60.
  230. Stark, R., Gruber, H., Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Hinkofer, L. (1999). Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen im Bereich des kaufmännischen Rechnens: Möglichkeiten der Optimierung einer Lernmethode. Wirtschaft und Erziehung, 51, 316-318.
  231. Stottler, R.H. & Ramachandran, S. (1999). A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Internet Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and ITS Authoring. In proceedings of FLAIRS Conference, 181–186.
  232. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
  233. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
  234. Sweller J. (1999). Instructional Design in Technical Areas, Melbourne, ACER.
  235. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.
  236. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P. & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
  237. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G.A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instructions, 2, 59-89.
  238. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 251–296.
  239. Tarmizi, R., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
  240. Tchounikine P. (2002a). Pour une ingénierie des environnement informatiques pour l’apprentissage humain. Revue Information-Interaction-Intelligence, 2(1), 59-95.
  241. Tchounikine P. (2002b). Conception des environnements informatiques d’apprentissage : mieux articulerinform atique et sciences humaines et sociales. In Baron G.L. & Bruillard E. (eds.), Les technologies en éducation : Perspectives de recherche et questions vives,, Paris, INRP - MSH - IUFM de Basse Normandie (ed), 203-210.
  242. Tourigny N. & Capus L. (2000). Towards Making Intelligent Training Systems Using Examples more Flexible and Reusable by Exploiting Case-Based Reasoning. In Workshop Proceedings of ITS’2000 : Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, 23–28.
  243. Trafton J.G. & Reiser B.J. (1993). The contribution of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1017-1022.
  244. Tricot, A. (1998). Charge cognitive et apprentissage. Une présentation des travaux de John Sweller. Revue de Psychologie de l’Éducation, 3, 37-64.
  245. Tricot (2003). IHM, cognition et environnements d’apprentissage. In G. Boy (Ed.),, L’ingénierie cognitive : IHM et cognition, Paris : Hermès Science, 411-447.
  246. Tricot, A., Pierre-Demarcy, C., & El Boussarghini, R. (1998). Définitions d’aides en fonction des types d’apprentissages dans des environnements hypermédia . In J.-F. Rouet & B. de La Passardière (Eds.), Hypermédias et Apprentissages, Paris, Presses de l'INRP / EPI, 41-58.
  247. Tricot, A., & Lafontaine, J. (2002). Une méthode pour évaluer conjointement l'utilisation un outil multimédia et l'apprentissage réalisé avec celui-ci. Le Français dans le Monde, 41-52.
  248. Trouche L. (2002). Génèses instrumentales, aspects individuels et collectifs. In Guin N. & Trouche L. (eds), Calculatrices symboliques. Transformer un outil en un instrument du travail mathématique : un problème didactique, la pensée sauvage édition, 243-275.
  249. Van Gog T, Pass, F. & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2004). Process-Oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer: Performance Through Enhanced Understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83–98.
  250. Van Merrienboer, J.J.G. & Kirshner, P. (2001). Three worlds of instructional design: state of the art and future directions, Instructional Science, 29, 429-41.
  251. Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load of a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 5-13.
  252. Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Krammer, H.P.M. (1987). Instructional strategie and tactics for the design of introductory computer programming courses in high school. Instructional Science, 16, 251–285.
  253. Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of the thought involved in addition and substraction problems. In Carpenter P.T., Moser, J.M., & Romberg, T.A. (eds.), Addition and substraction: A cognitive perspective, Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 39-58.
  254. Vergnaud G. (1985). Concepts et schèmes dans une théorie opératoire de la représentation. Psychologie française, 245-251.
  255. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
  256. Ward, M. & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1-39.
  257. Willis, G.B., & Fuson, K.C. (1988). Teaching children to use schematic drawings to solve addition and subtraction word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 190-201.
  258. Wong, R.M.F., Lawson, M.J. & Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self-explanation training on students' problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 233-262.
  259. Zhu, X., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137-166.