D

1. Danon-Boileau, L., & Barbier, D. (2002). Play-On: Un logiciel d’entraînement à la lecture. Paris: Audivi-Média.
2. Dauer, R., M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51-62.
3. DeCasper A. J., Lecanuet J-P., Busnel M-C., Granier-Deferre C. & Maugeais R. (1994). Foetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 159-164.
4. Defior, S. (2004). Phonological Awareness and Learning to Read: A cross-Linguistic Perspective. In T. Nunes, & P.Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 631-649). Kluwer Academic Publishers, GB.
5. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2000). Cerebral specialization for speech and non-speech stimuli in infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 449-460.
6. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2004). Bases cérébrales de l'acquisition du langage : apport de la neuro-imagerie. Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 52, 452–459.
7. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Christophe A, & van Ooijen B. (2000). Bases cérébrales de l'acquisition du langage dans l'émergence du langage. Paris : PUF.
8. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S., & Hertz-Panier, L. (2002). Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science, 298, 2013-2015.
9. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Houston, D. (1998). Faster orientation latency toward native language in two-month-old infants. Language and Speech, 41, 21-43.
10. Delattre, P. (1966). Studies in comparatives phonetics. La haye, Mouton.
11. Demont, E., & Gombert, J.-E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 315-332.
12. Demont, E., & Gombert, J.-E. (2007). Relations entre conscience phonologique et apprentissage de la lecture : peut-on sortir de la relation circulaire ? In L’acquisition du langage et ses troubles, sous la direction de Elisabeth Demont et Marie-Noëlle Metz-Lutz, p.47-79, Solal Marseille.
13. Doignon, N., & Zagar, D. (2005). Illusory conjunctions in French: the nature of sublexical units in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 20, 443-464.
14. Doignon, N., & Zagar, D. (2006). Les enfants en cours d'apprentissage de la lecture perçoivent-ils la syllabe à l'écrit ? Canadian journal of experimental psychology 60, 258-274.
15. Dumay, N., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Content, A. (2002). The role of the syllable in lexical segmentation in french: Word-spotting data. Brain and Language,81, 144-161.
16. Duncan, L., Colé, P., Seymour, P. H. K. & Magnan, A. (2006). Differing sequences of metaphonological development in French and English. Journal of Child Language, 33, 369-399.
17. Duncan L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171-208.
18. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small to large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1081-1104.
19. Dupoux, E. (2004 a). Combien de syllabes dans psycholinguistique ? Discussions autour de Juan Segui. In L. Ferrand et J. Grainger (Eds.), Psycholinguistique cognitive. Essais en l’honneur de Juan Segui. Bruxelles : De Boeck.
20. Dupoux, E. (2004 b). The Acquisition of Discrete Segmental Categories: Data and Model. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Acoustics, Kyoto, Japan.
21. Dupoux E., & Mehler J. (1990). Monitoring the lexicon with normal and compressed speech : Frequency effects and the prelexical code. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 316-335.