G

1. Germain, B. (2007). Les didacticiels de lecture dans les classes primaires. In : J.-F. Rouet, B. Germain, et I. Mazel (Eds.). Lecture et technologies numériques. Enjeux et défis des technologies numériques pour l’enseignement et les pratiques de lecture. (pp. 145-175). Poitiers: SCEREN / CNDP.
2. Gleitman, L. & Wanner, E. (1982). The state of art. In : E. Wanner et L. Gleitman (Eds.). Language acquisition : The state of the art, (pp. 3-48). Cambridge : University Press.
3. Glushko, R. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading allowed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
4. Goldsmith, J. A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Gombert, J.-E. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique. Paris : PUF.
6. Gombert, J.-E. (1992). Activité de lecture et activités associées. In: M. Fayol & al. (Eds.), Psychologie cognitive de la lecture (pp.107-140). Paris : PUF.
7. Gombert, J.-E. (2003). L’apprentissage des codes grapho-phonologique et grapho-sémantique en lecture. In M.N. Romdhane, Gombert, J.-E., & M., Belajouza, Apprentissage de la lecture. Perspectives comparatives (pp.19-34). Rennes : PUR.
8. Gombert, J.-E, Bonjour, E., & Marec-Breton, N. (2004). Processus implicites et traitements attentionnels dans l’apprentissage de la lecture. In M. N. Metz-Luz, E. Demont, C. Seegmuller, M.de Agostini & N. Bruneau. Solal (Eds.), Développement cognitif et troubles des apprentissages: évaluer, comprendre, rééduquer et prendre en charge (pp. 175-192). Marseille : Solar.
9. Gombert, J.-E., Bryant, P., Warrick, N. (1997). Les analogies dans l’apprentissage de la lecture et de l’orthographe. InL. Rieben, M. Fayol & C. Perfetti (Eds.), L’acquisition de l’orthographe (pp. 319-334). Genève : Delachaux et Niestlé.
10. Goodall, M. (1984). Can four year olds "read" words in the environment? Reading Teacher, 37, 478-482.
11. Goslin, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Syllable frequency effects in French visual word recognition : An ERP study, Brain Research, 1115, 121-134.
12. Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
13. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443-475.
14. Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: the importance of
15. rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217-240.
16. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1992). Rhyme, analogy and children's reading. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 49-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
18. Goswami, U., & East, M. (2000). Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual
19. and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 63-93
20. Goswami, U., Gombert, J.-E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52
21. Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read : An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179-196.
22. Gough, P. B., Juel, C. & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling and the orthography cipher. In P. Gough, L. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (p.35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
23. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
24. Grainger, J. & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.