M

1. Macaruso, P., Hook, P., E., & McCabe, R. (2006). The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 162–172.
2. MacNeilage, P. F. (1980). The control of speech production. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kaveanagh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology Vol. 1: Production (pp. 9– 21). New York: Academic Press.
3. MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000 a) Evolution of speech: The relation between ontogeny and phylogeny. In C. Knight, J. R. Hurford & M. Studdert-Kennedy, (Eds.), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. MacNeilage, P., & Davis, B. (2000 b). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science, 288, 527-531.
5. Magnan A., & Aimar, J.B. (2000). The syllabic segmentation in first grade: effects of training types, 27th International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm.
6. Magnan, A., & Biancheri, P. (2001). Le traitement des voyelles nasalisées et des groupes consonantiques par l'apprenti-lecteur francophone. Journal International de Psychologie, 36, 301-313.
7. Magnan, A., & Colé, P. (1999). Phonological recoding in first and second grade french readers : Effect of vowel nazalisation. Paper presented at the IXth European Conference on Devlopmental Psychology, Islands of Spetses.
8. Magnan, A. & Colé, P. (2000).Syllabe types and phonological awareness of French pre-schoolers and first graders. Paper presented at the XXVII International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
9. Magnan, A, & Ecalle, J. (2001). Effets de congruence syllabique dans une tâche d'amorçage en identification perceptive chez des enfants dyslexiques et normo-lecteurs. In H. Paugam-Moisy, V. Nyckees, & J. Caron-Pargue (Eds), La cognition entre individu et société (pp.227-239). Paris: Hermès Science Publications.
10. Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2006). Audio-visual training in children with reading disabilities. Computers & Education, 46, 407-425.
11. Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., & Veuillet, E. (2005). Habiletés phonologiques, identification de mots écrits et déficits auditifs perceptifs chez les enfants dyslexiques: effet d'u entraînement audio-visuel. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 152, 29-40.
12. Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (2004). Effect an audio-visual training program in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 131-140.
13. Malone, T. (1980). What Makes Things Fun to Learn? Heuristics for Designing Instructional Computer Games. Proceedings of the 3 rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on Small systems, pp.162-169, Palo Alto. 
14. Malone, T. & Levin, J. (1984). Microcomputers in education: Cognitive and social design principles, in Instructional Software - Principles and Perspective for Design and Use, Walker and Hess, Eds., Wadsworth.
15. Mann, V. A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory: Can they presage early reading problems? Journal of Learning Disabilities , 17, 592-599.
16. Marsh G., Friedman M. P., Welsch V., & Desberg P. (1981). A cognitive developmental theory of reading acquisition. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research : advances in theory and practice (pp. 199-221). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Massaro D. W. (1974). Perceptual units in speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 99-208.
18. Mathey, S. , & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition : The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Behavior, Brain and Cognition, 8, 107-121.
19. Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of syllabic neighbourhood in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.
20. McCandliss, B. D., Beck, I., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: A study of the Worl Building Intervention. Scientific studies of reading, 3,75-104.
21. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
22. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing : A handbook of models, programs, and exercises.Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
23. Mehler, J., Bertoncini, J.-Y., Barriere, M., & Jassik- Gerschenfeld, D. (1978). Infant recognition of the mother's voice. Perception, 7, 491-497.
24. Mehler J., Dommergues, J.-Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
25. Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J. (1990). Constraining models of lexical access: The onset of word recognition. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing (pp. 236-262). Mass: MIT Press.
26. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143-178.
27. Metsala, J., & Walley, A. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring oflexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Mills, M., & Meluish, E. (1974). Recognition of Mother’s Voice in Early Infancy, Nature, 252, 123-124.
29. Mioduser, D., Tur-Kaspa, H., & Leitner, I. (2000). The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 54-63.
30. Mitchell, M.J., & Fox, B.J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Reasearch and Instruction, 40(4), 315-332.
31. Moon, C., Cooper, R. P., & Fifer, W. P. (1993). Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495-500.
32. Mody M., Studdert-Kennedy M., & Brady S. (1997). Speech Perception Deficits in Poor Readers: Auditory Processing or Phonological Coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199-231.
33. Moore, D. R, Rosenberg, J. F., & Coleman, J. S. (2005). Discrimination training of phonemic contrasts enhances phonological processing in mainstream school children. Brain and Language, 94, 72-85.
34. Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a
35. sequence of phones arise spontaneously. Cognition, 7, 323-331.
36. Morgan, J. & Demuth, K. (1996) . Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Mousty, P., Leybaert, J., Alegria, J., Content, A., & Morais, J. (1994). Belec: une batterie d’évaluation du langage écrit et de ses troubles. In J. Grégoire & B. Piérart (Eds.), Evaluer les troubles de la lecture. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Wesmael.
38. Muneaux, M. (2004). Effets orthographiques sur la perception des mots parlés : études chez l’apprenti-lecteur et le lecteur expert. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université de Provence, France.