S

1. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of
2. distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
3. Savin, H. B., & Bever, T. G. (1970). The non-perceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 295-302.
4. Schiller, N., O. (1998). The effect of visually masked primes on the naming latencies of word and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 484-507.
5. Schiller, N., O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 512–528.
6. Schiller, N. O., Meyer, A. S., Baayen, R. H. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). A Comparison of Lexeme and Speech Syllables in Dutch. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 8-28.
7. Sebastian, N., Dupoux, E., Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish: The role of stress. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18-32.
8. Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Computer-supported phonological awareness intervention for kindergarten children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 229-239.
9. Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech perception ? In H. Bouma, & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Segui, J., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). The role of the syllable in speech segmentation, phoneme identification and lexical access. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing (pp. 263-280). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
11. Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., Mehler, J. (1981). Phoneme monitoring, syllable monitoring and lexical access. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 471-477.
12. Segui, J., Frauenfelder U. H. & Halle, P. (2001). Phonotactic constraints shape speech perception: Implications for sublexical and lexical processing. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler, Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition : Access units or orthographic redundancy ? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII : The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J : Erlbaum.
14. Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
15. Seidenberg, M. S., Plaut, D., C., Petersen, A. S., McClelland, J. L., & McRae, K. (1994). Nonword prononciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1177-1196.
16. Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
17. Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Démonet, J. F. (2001). Perceptual categorization of speech sounds in dyslexics. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 384-399.
18. Seymour, P. H. K. (1986). Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
19. Seymour, P. H. K. (1990). Developmental dyslexia. In M.W. Eysenck (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology : an international review.Chichester: Wiley.
20. Seymour, P. H. K. (1997). Les fondations du développement orthographique et morphographique de l’anglais. In L. Rieben, M. Fayol & C.A. Perfetti (Eds.), Des orthographes et leur acquisition (pp. 319-337). Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé.
21. Seymour, P. H. K., & Duncan, L. (1997). Small versus large unit theories of reading acquisition. Dyslexia, 3 , 125-134.
22. Seymour, P. H. K., & Evans, H. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read. Reading and Writing, 6, 221-250.
23. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218.
24. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: a direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309-1324.
25. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309-1324.
26. Shen, Y. & Peterson, G. G. (1962). Isochronism in English, University of Buffalo Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 9, pp. 1-36.
27. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT Contribute to Powerful Learning Environments in Primary Education. Computers and Education, 44, 343 – 355.
28. Spaai, G. W. G., Reitsma, P., & Ellermann, H. H. (1991). Effects of segmented and whole-word sound feedback on learning to read single words. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 204-213.
29. Spence, M. J. & DeCasper, A. J. (1987). Prenatal experience with low-frequency maternal voice sounds influences neonatal perception of maternal voice samples. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 133-142.
30. Spinelli, E., & Radeau, M. (2004). La syllabe contraint-elle la cohorte initiale en Français ? In L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (Eds), Psychologie cognitive : Essais en l’honneur de Juan Segui (pp 75-91).Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
31. Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-89.
32. Sprenger-Charolles, L. (1992). L’évolution des mécanismes d’identification des mots. In M. Fayol, J.E. Gombert, P. Lecoq, L. Sprenger-Charolles et D. Zagar (dir.), Psychologie cognitive de la lec-ture (p.107-140). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
33. Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Linguistic processes in Reading and Spelling : The Case of Alphabetic Writing Systems : English, French, German and Spanish. In T. Nunes, & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp.43-65). Kluwer Academic Publishers, GB.
34. Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Bonnet, P. (1996). New doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Current Psychology of Cognition, 15, 173-208.
35. Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Colé, P. (2003). Lecture et dyslexie. Approche cognitive. Paris : Edition Dunod.
36. Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Khomsi, A. (1989). Les stratégies d'identification de mots dans un contexte-image: comparaisons entre "bons" et "mauvais" lecteurs. In: L. Rieben, & C. Perfetti (Eds.), L'apprenti-lecteur. Recherches empiriques et implications pédagogiques (pp. 307-329). Neuchâtel-Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
37. Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of syllabic structure on the development of reading and spelling skills in French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 485-505.
38. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S. & Béchennec, D. (1997). Beginning reading and spelling acquisition in French: A longitudinal study. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, Theory, and Practice across Languages (pp.339-359). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Nieslé).
39. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S. & Béchennec, D. (1998). Phonological mediation and orthographic factors in silent reading. Scientific Study of Reading, 2, 3-29.
40. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of Phonological and Orthographic Processing in Reading Aloud, in Silent Reading and in Spelling: A Four Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194-217.
41. Stuart, M. & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages ? Cognition, 30, 139-181.