Bibliographie

Bibliographie

  1. Bashford, J. A. Jr., Warren, R. M., & Brown, C. A. (1996). Use of speech modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 342-350.
  2. Bellis, T. J., Trent, N., & Kraus, N. (2000). Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(2), 791-797.
  3. Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A., & Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain and Language, 40, 471-490.
  4. Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M., & Prieto, T. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging, The Journal of Neuroscience , 17 , 353-362.
  5. Bishop, D. V., Carlyon, R. P., Deecks, J. M., & Bishop, S. J. (1999). Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Review. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1295-1310.
  6. Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858-888.
  7. Boets, B., Ghesquière, P., Wieringen, A., & Wouters, J. (2007). Speech perception in preschoolers at family risk for dyslexia: Relations with low-level auditory processing and phonological ability. Brain and Language, 101(1), 19-30.
  8. Bolia, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Ericson, M. A., & Simpson, B. D. (2000). A speech corpus for multitalkers communications research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1065-1066.
  9. Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46 , 80-97.
  10. Brady, S., Shankweiler, D., & Mann, V. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35 (2), 345-367.
  11. Bray, P., & Kemp, D. T. (1987). An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 191-204.
  12. Bronkhorst, A. (2000). The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acustica, 86, 117-128.
  13. Bronkhorst, A., & Plomp, R. (1992). Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 92, 3132-3138.
  14. Brouwer, S. M. (2006). Spoken word processing in adults with dyslexia. Thesis. Utrecht University.
  15. Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
  16. Brungart, D. S. (2001a). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101-1109.
  17. Brungart, D. S. (2001b). Optimizing multitalker speech displays with near-field HRTFs. Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display, 169-174.
  18. Brungart, D. S., Chang, P. S., Simpson, B. D., & Wang, D. (2006). Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time frequency segregation. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 120, 4007-4018.
  19. Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2002). The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(2), 664-676.
  20. Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Ericson, M. A., & Scott, K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
  21. Carhart, R., Tillman, T. W., & Greetis, E. S. (1969). Perceptual masking in multiple sound background. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 694-703.
  22. Chermak, G. D., Vonhof, M. R., & Bendel, R. B. (1989). Word identification performance in. the presence of competing speech and noise in learning disabled adults. Ear & Hearing, 10, 90-93.
  23. Cherry, E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
  24. Cohen, M., Campbell, R., & Yaghmai, F. (1989). Neuropathological abnormalities in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Neurology, 25, 567-570.
  25. Collet, L., Kemp, D. T., Veuillet, E., Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., & Morgon, A. (1990). Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human participants. Hearing Research, 43, 251-262.
  26. Collet, L., Veuillet, E., Bene, J., & Morgon, A. (1992). Effects of contralateral white noise on click-evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology, 31, 1-7.
  27. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  28. Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084-1096.
  29. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelman, T., & Blasko, D. G. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 463-480.
  30. Content, A., Dumay, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2000). The role of syllable structure in lexical segmentation in French. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes, 29-31st May 2000, Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  31. Content, A., Morais J., Alegria J., Bertelson P. (1982). Accelerating the development of phonetic segmentation skills in kindergartners. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 2, 259-269.
  32. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331-335.
  33. Cooper, N. P., & Guinan, J. J. Jr. (2003). Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivo-cochlear efferent activity. Journal of Physiology, 548(1), 307-312.
  34. Crouzet, O. (2000). Segmentation de la Parole en Mots et Régularités Phonotactiques : Effets Phonologiques, Probabilistes ou Lexicaux ? Thèse de Doctorat de 3ème Cycle, Université Paris 5 - René Descartes. 310 p.
  35. Crow, T. J., Ball, J., Bloom, S. R. (1989) Schizophrenia as an anomaly of development of cerebral asymmetry. A postmortem study and a proposal concerning the genetic basis of the disease. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46 , 1145 -1150.
  36. Culing, J. F. & Darwin, C. J. (1993). The role of timbre in the segregation of simultaneus voices with intersecting F0 contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 303-309.
  37. Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., Norris, D. G., & Somejuan, A. (2001). The roll of the silly ball. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler, (pp181-194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  38. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
  39. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., Segui, J. (1987). Phoneme monitoring and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
  40. Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. Sentence processing: Psycholingustic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, ed. W.E. Cooper & E.C.T Walker.
  41. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. JEP: HPP, 14, 113-121.
  42. Darwin, C. J., Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2003). Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 114(5), 2913-2922.
  43. Demonet, J. F., Chollet, F., Ramsay, S., Cardebat, D., Nespoulous, J. L., Wise, R., Rascol, A. & Frackowiak, R., (1992). The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain, 115, 1753-1768.
  44. Divenyi, P. L. (2004). Masking the feature-information in multi-stream speech-analogue displays. In P.L. Divenyi (Ed.), Speech Separation by Man and Machine, (pp. 269-281). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  45. Dorsaint-Pierre, R., Penhune, V. B., Watkins, K. E., Neelin, P., Lerch, J. P., Bouffard, M., & Zatorre, R. J. (2006). Asymmetries of the planum temporale and Heschl’s gyrus: relationship to language lateralization. Brain, 129, 1164-1176.
  46. Drullman, R., & Bronkhorst, A. (2000). Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 107 , 2224–2235.
  47. Dupoux, E., Kouider, S. & Mehler, J. (2003). Unattended Lexical Activation? Explorations using Dichotic Priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 172-184.
  48. Dworczak, F., Bedoin, N., & Krifi, S. Internet et les troubles d'apprentissage de la lecture: synergies et partenariats créés. In G. Pithon, C. Asdih and S. Larivée (Eds.), Construire une "communauté éducative": le partenariat familles-associations-écoles-universités.De Boeck. (in press).
  49. Edwards, J., & Lahey, M. (1996). Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1263-1273.
  50. Elbaz, P., Leca, F., Elbaz, E. F., & Miller, P. (1992).Vocals in silence and noise. A simple test of resistance of intelligibility in noisy environment. Annales d’otolaryngologie et de chirurgie cervicofaciale, 109(7), 373-385.
  51. Ellis, D. P. W. (1998). Using knowledge to organize sound: The prediction-driven approach to computational auditory scene analysis, and its application to speech/nonspeech mixtures. Speech Communication special issue on Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, M. Cooke & H. Okuno, eds., 27(3-4), 281-298.
  52. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
  53. Ericson, M. A., & McKinley, R. L., (1997). The intelligibility of multiple talkers spatially separated in noise, in Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments, Edited by R. H. Gilkey and T. R. Anderson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J.), pp. 701-724.
  54. Fawcett, A. J., Nicolson, R. I., & Dean, P. (1996). Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 259-283.
  55. Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1995). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics.Brain and Language, 39, 485-497.
  56. Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 781-804.
  57. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Content, A. (1999). The role of the syllable in spoken word recognition: Access or segmentation? Actes des IIèmes Journées d'Etudes Linguistiques (pp.1-8). Nantes (France).
  58. Frauenfelder, U., & Peeters, G. (1990). Lexical segmentation in TRACE: An exercise in simulation. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 50-86). Cambridge, Mass: TheMIT Press.
  59. Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phoneme processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 77-91.
  60. Freyman, R., Balakrishnan, U., and Helfer, K. (2001). Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 109 , 2112-2122.
  61. Frith, U. (1999). Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 5, 192–214.
  62. Galaburda, A. M., Sherman, G. F., Rosen, G. D., Aboitiz, F., & Geschwind, N. (1985). Developmental dyslexia: four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies. Annals of Neurology, 18, 222-233.
  63. Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 110-125.
  64. Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M. (2006). Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2445–2454.
  65. Geschwind, N., & Levitsky, W. (1968). Human Brain: Left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science, 161, 186-187.
  66. Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., LeBihan, D., & Pallier, C. (2007). Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 757-782.
  67. Giard, M. H., Collet, L., Bouchet, P., & Pernier, J. (1994). Auditory selective attention in the human cochlea. Brain Research, 633, 353-356.
  68. Giraud, A. L., Collet, L., Chéry-Croze, S., Magnan, J., & Chays, A. (1995). Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Research, 705(1-2), 15-23.
  69. Giraud, K., Demonet, J. F., Habib, M., Marquis, P., Chauvel, P., & Liégeois-Chauvel, C. (2005). Auditory evoked potential patterns to voiced and voiceless speech sounds in adult developmental dyslexics with persistent deficits. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1524-1534.
  70. Giraud, A. L., Garnier, S., Micheyl, C., Lina-Granade, G., Chays, A., & Chery-Croze, S. (1997). Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Involved In Speech In Noise Intelligibility. Neuroreport, 8, 1779-1783.
  71. Greenberg, S., & Arai, T. (2001). The relation between speech intelligibility and the complex modulation spectrum. Proceedings of the 7th Eurospeech Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Vol. 1 (pp. 473-476). Aalborg.
  72. Guinan, J. J. Jr. (1986). Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. Scandinavian Audiology, 25, 53-62.
  73. Guinan, J. J. Jr. (1996). Physiology of olivocochlear efferents. In: The cochlea (Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds), pp 435-502. New York: Springer.
  74. Habib, M. (2000) The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia. An overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123(12), 2373-2399.
  75. Hari, R., & Kiesilä, P. (1996). Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience letters, 205, 138-140.
  76. Hartley, D. E. H., & Moore, D. R. (2002). Auditory processing efficiency deficits in children with developmental language impairments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2962-2966.
  77. Hawley, M., Litovsky, R., & Culling, J. (2000). The ‘cocktail party’ effect with four kinds of maskers: Speech, time-reversed speech, speech shaped noise, or modulated speech shaped noise. In Proceedings of the Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p.31.
  78. Helenius, P., Uutela, K., & Hari, R. (1999). Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults. Brain, 122, 907-913.
  79. Henderson, L. (1985). Toward a psychology of morphemes. In A.W. Wallis (Eds.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol.1 (pp. 15-72). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.
  80. Howard, D., Patterson, K., Wise, R., Brown, W. D., Friston, K., Weiller, C. & Frackowiak, R. (1992). The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. Brain, 115, 1769-1782.
  81. Huffman, R. F., & Henson, O. W. Jr. (1990). The descending auditory pathway and acousticomotor systems: connections with the inferior colliculus. Brain Research Reviews, 15, 295-323.
  82. Kawase, T., Delgutte, B., & Liberman, M. C. (1993). Anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex, II. Enhancement of auditory nerve responses to masked tones. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2533-2549.
  83. Kawase, T., Liberman, M. C. (1993). Anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex, I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2519-2532.
  84. Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of Acoustic Society of America , 64, 1386-1391.
  85. Kemp, D. T. (1979). Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 224, 37-45.
  86. Khalfa, S. (1999). Caractérisation des asymétries fonctionnelles de l’appareil auditif périphérique chez l’humain : relations avec la spécialisation hémisphérique ? Thèse de Doctorat en Neuropsychologie. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1. pp. 318.
  87. Khalfa, S., Bougeard, R., Morand, N., Veuillet, E., Isnard, J., Guenot, M., Ryvlin, P., Fischer, C., & Collet, L. (2001). Evidence of peripheral auditory activity modulation by the auditory cortex in humans. Neuroscience, 104(2), 347-358.
  88. Khalfa, S., & Collet, L. (1996). Functional asymmetry of medial olivocochlear system in humans. Towards a peripheral auditory lateralization. NeuroReport, 7, 993-996.
  89. Khalfa, S., Morlet, T., Veuillet, E., Perrot, X., & Collet, L. (1998). Existence d’une latéralisation de l’appareil auditif périphérique. Annales d’otolaryngologie et de chirurgie cervicofaciale, 115, 156-160.
  90. Khalfa, S., Veuillet, E., Collet, L. (1998). Influence of handedness on peripheral auditory asymmetry. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 2731–2737.
  91. Kidd, G. J., Mason, C., & Rohtla, T. (1995). Binaural advantage for sound pattern identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(4), 1977-1986.
  92. Kidd, G. J., Mason, C., Rohtla, T., & Deliwala, P. (1998). Release from informational masking due to the spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 422–431.
  93. Kujala, T., Myllyviita, K., Trevaniemi, M., Alho, K., Kallio, J., & Näätanen, R. (2000). Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology, 37, 262-266.
  94. Kumar, A. E, & Vanaja, C. D. (2004). Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear & Hearing, 25, 124-146.
  95. Larsen, J. P., Høien, T., Lundberg, I., & Ødegaard, H. (1990). MRI evaluation of the size and symmetry of the planum temporale in adolescents with developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 39, 289-301.
  96. Lefavrais, P. (1965). Test de l’Alouette. ECPA: Paris.
  97. Leonard, C. M., Eckert, M. A., Lombardino, L. J., Oakland, T., Kranzler, J., Mohr, C. M., et al. (2001). Anatomical risk factors for phonological dyslexia. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 48-57.
  98. Licklider, J. C. R., & Miller, G. A. (1960). The Perception of Speech. In Stevens, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 1040-1074). New York: Wiley.
  99. Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M., (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 88, 7943-7947.
  100. Luce, P. A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
  101. Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19 , 1-36.
  102. Luce, P., Pisoni, D., & Goldinger, S. (1990). Similarity neighbourhoods of spoken words. In G. Altmann, Ed., Cognitive Models of Speech Perception: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, 122-147. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  103. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior , New York, Wiley.
  104. Maillart, C., Schelstraete, M., & Hupet, M. (2004). Phonological representations in children with SLI: A study of French. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 187-198.
  105. Manis, F. R., McBride-Chang, C., Seidenberg, M. S., Keating, P., Doi, L. M., Munson, B., et al. (1997). Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 211-235.
  106. Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548-558.
  107. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition, in H. Bouma & D.G Bouwhuis ed., Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Asociates, Hilsdale, NJ.
  108. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25,71-102.
  109. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing, pp. 148–172. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
  110. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
  111. Marslen-Wilson W. D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: the importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
  112. McAnally, K. I., & Stein, J. F., (1996). Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences. 263, 961-965.
  113. McArthur, G. M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2001). Auditory perceptual processing in people with reading and oral language impairments: Current issues and recommendations. Dyslexia, 7, 150-170.
  114. McArthur, G. M., & Hogben, J. H. (2001). Auditory backward recognition masking in children with a specific language impairment and children with a specific reading disability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1092-1100.
  115. McBride-Chang, C. (1995). Phonological processing, speech perception, and reading disability: An integrative review. Educational Psychologist, 30, 109-121.
  116. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18 , 1-86.
  117. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
  118. McCusker, L. X., Holley-Wilcox, P., & Hillinger, M. L. (1979). Frequency effects in auditory and visual word recognition. Paper presented to the Southwestern Psychological Association (cited in McCusker et al., 1981).
  119. Mehler, J. (1981). The role of syllables in speech processing: Infant and adult data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 295, 333-352.
  120. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
  121. Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J. (1990). Constraining Models of Lexical Access: The onset of word recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.). Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 236-262). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  122. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143-178.
  123. Mehler, J., Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U. (1981). The role of the syllable in language acquision and perception. In T.F. Myers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (Eds), The Cognitive Representation of the Speech, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  124. Metsala, J. L., Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In: J.L. Metsala & L.C. Ehri (Eds.). Word recognition in beginning literacy.London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 89-119.
  125. Meunier, F., Cenier, T., Barkat, M. & Magrin-Chagnolleau, I., (2002). Mesure d’intelligibilité de segments de parole à l’envers en français, Actes des 24ème Journées d’étude sur la parole (JEP), p.117-120, Nancy, France.
  126. Micheyl, C. (1995). Implication des mécanismes cochléaires actifs et du système efférent olivocochléaire median dans la perception auditive. Thèse de Doctorat en Psychologie. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon2. pp. 273.
  127. Micheyl, C., & Collet, L. (1996). Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1604-1610.
  128. Micheyl, C., Khalfa, S., Perrot, X., & Collet, L. (1997). Difference in cochlear efferent activity between musicians and non musicians. Neuroreport, 8, 1047-1050.
  129. Micheyl, C., Morlet, T., Giraud, A. L., Collet, L., & Morgon A. (1995). Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multitone complex in noise. Acta Otolaryngologica, 115, 178-182.
  130. Micheyl, C., Perrot, X., Collet, L. (1997). Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans. Behavioural Neuroscience, 111, 801-807.
  131. Miller, G. A. (1947). The masking of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 44 , 105-129.
  132. Moore, B. C. J. (2004). An introduction to the psychology of hearing. Fifth Edition. Elsevier Academic Press.
  133. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 56-60.
  134. Moulin, A. (1993). Caractérisation des otoémissions acoustiques et du système efférent cochléaire médian chez l’humain. Thèse de Doctorat en Neurosciences. Lyon: Université Claude Bernard Lyon1.
  135. Moulin, A., Collet, L., Veuillet, E., & Morgon, A., (1993). Interrelations between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distorsion products in humans. Hearing Research, 65, 193-210.
  136. Neff, D. L. (1995). Signal properties that reduces masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1909-1920.
  137. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A New French Lexical Database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(3), 516-524.
  138. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet : LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique , 101 , 447-462.
  139. Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (1990) Automaticity: a new framework for dyslexia research. Cognition, 35, 159-182.
  140. Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., Berry, E. L., Jenkins, I. H., Dean, P., & Brooks, D. J. (1999). Association of abnormal cerebellar activation with motor learning difficulties in dyslexic adults. Lancet, 353, 1662-1667.
  141. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
  142. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299-370.
  143. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
  144. Pallier, C. (1994). Rôle de la syllabe dans la perception de la parole: Etudes attentionnelles. Thèse de doctorat, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
  145. Paulesu, E., Démonet, J.-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., et al. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural Diversity and Biological Unity. Science, 291, 2165-2167.
  146. Penhune, V. B., Cismaru, R., Dorsaint-Pierre, R., Petitto, L. A., Zatorre R. J. (2003). The morphometry of auditory cortex in the congenitally deaf measured using MRI. Neuroimage, 20, 1215-1225.
  147. Penhune, V. B., Zatorre, R. J., MacDonald, J. D., Evans, A. C. (1996). Interhemispheric anatomical difference in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 661–672.
  148. Perrot, X., Ryvlin, P., Isnard, J., Guénot, M., Catenoix, H., Fischer, C., et al. (2006). Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 941–948.
  149. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593–608.
  150. Powell, H. W. R, Parker, G. J. M., Alexander, D. C., Symms, M. R. Boulby, P. A., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., et al. (2006). Hemispheric asymmetries in language-related pathways: a combined functional MRI and tractography study. Neuroimage, 32, 388-399.
  151. Price, C. J., Wise, R. J., Warburton, E. A., Moore, C. J., Howard, D., Patterson, K., Frackowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. J. (1996). Hearing and saying. The functional neuro-anatomy of auditory word processing, Brain, 119, 919-931.
  152. Pujol, J., Deus, J., Losilla, J. M., & Capdevila, A. (1999). Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology, 52, 1038-1043.
  153. Pujol, R., Blatrix, S., Pujol, T. (1999). Promenade autour de la cochlée, site pédagogique http://www.cochlee.info/, INSERM et Université Montpellier 1.
  154. Radeau, M., Mousty, P., Bertelson, P. (1989). The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken- word recognition, Psychological Research, 51, 123-128.
  155. Ramus, F. (2002). Dyslexie: la cognition en désordre? La Recherche Hors-Série, 9,66-68.
  156. Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212-218.
  157. Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841-865.
  158. Rasmussen, G. L. (1946). The olivary pedoncule and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 84, 141-219.
  159. Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: H.K. Lewis.
  160. Reed, M. A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–292.
  161. Rhebergen, K. S., Versfeld, N. J., & Dreschler, W. A. (2005). Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1274-1277.
  162. Robichon, F., Levrier, O., Farnarier, P., & Habib, M. (2000). Developmental dyslexia: Atypical cortical asymmetries and functional significance. European Journal of Neurology, 7, 35-46.
  163. Rosen, S., & Manganari, E. (1999). The relationship between speech and non-speech auditory processing in children with dyslexia. Speech, hearing and Language: Work in progress, 11, 160-186.
  164. Rüsseler, J., Becker, P., Johannes, S., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Semantic, syntactic, and phonological processing of written words in adult developmental dyslexic readers: an event-related brain potential study. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 52.
  165. Saberi, K., & Perrott, D. R. (1999). Cognitive restoration of reversed speech. Nature, 398, 760.
  166. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 274, 1926-1928.
  167. Samuel, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28-51.
  168. Samuel, A. G. (1997). Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97-127.
  169. Scharf, B., Magnan, J., & Chays, A. (1997). On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing : 16 case studies. Hearing Research, 103, 101-122.
  170. Schulte-Körne, G., Deimel, W., Bartling J., & Remschmidt, H. (2001). Speech perception deficit in dyslexic adults as measured by mismatch negativity (MMN). International Journal of Psychophysiology. 40, 77-87.
  171. Scott, S. K., Blank, C. C., Rosen, S., & Wise, R. J. (2000). Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain, 123(12), 2400-2406.
  172. Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech perception ? In H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  173. Segui, J., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). The role of the syllable in speech segmentation, phoneme identification and lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 263-280). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  174. Segui, J., & Frauenfelder, U. (1986). The effects of lexical constraints upon speech perception. In F. Klix and H. Hagendorf (Eds), Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 795-808.
  175. Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Démonnet, J. F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Langage and Hearing Research, 44, 384-399.
  176. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
  177. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
  178. Shillcock, R. (1990). Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 24-49) .Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  179. Simpson, S. A., & Cooke, M. (2005). Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a non-monotonic function of N (L). Journal of Acoustic Society of America. 118, 2775–2778.
  180. Slowiaczek, L. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 14, 230–237.
  181. Snowling, M. J. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Research. 43, 219-234.
  182. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  183. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Language and literacy skills: who is at risk and why? In D.V.M. Bishop & L.B. Leonard (Eds.) Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome. Hove UK: Psychology Press, 245-259.
  184. Sperry, J., Wiley, T., & Chial, M. (1997). Word recognition performance in various background competitors. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(2), 71-80.
  185. Spinelli, E. Segui, J., & Radeau, M. (2001). Phonological Priming in Spoken Word recognition With Disyllabic Targets. Language and Cognitive Processes,16, 367-392.
  186. Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2003). Lecture et dyslexie. Paris: Dunod.
  187. Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read, the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 147-152.
  188. Stollman, M., Kapteyn, T., & Sleeswijk, B. (1994). Effect of time-scale modification of speech on the speech recognition threshold in noise for hearing-impaired and language-impaired children. Scandinavian Audiology, 23 , 39-46.
  189. Summers, V., & Molis, M. R. (2004). Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 47(2), 245-256.
  190. Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1986). Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition, 22, 259-282.
  191. Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Langage, 9, 182-198.
  192. Tallal,P. (1984) Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia? That’s the question. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5 , 167-169.
  193. Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the pre-eminence of temporal processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 27-47.
  194. Tallal, P., & Newcombe, P. (1978). Impairment of auditory perception and language comprehension in dysphasia. Brain and Language, 5, 13-34.
  195. Valdois, S. (2004). Les sous-types de dyslexies développementales. In S. Valdois, P. Colé & D. David (Eds). Apprentissage de la lecture et dyslexies développementales : de la théorie à la pratique (pp. 171-198). Marseille : Editions Solal.
  196. Van Engen, K. & Bradlow, A. R. (2007). Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 519-526.
  197. Van Ingelghem, M., van Wieringen, A., Wouters, J., Vandenbussche, E., Onghena, P., & Ghesquière, P. (2001). Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia. Neuroreport, 12, 1-4.
  198. Veuillet, E., Collet, L., & Bazin, F. (1999). Objective evidence of peripheral auditory disorders in learning-impaired children. Journal of Audiological Medicine, 8(1), 18-29.
  199. Veuillet, E., Collet, L., & Duclaux, R. (1991). Contralateral auditory stimulation and active micromechanical properties in human participants: Dependence on stimulus variables. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 724-735.
  200. Veuillet, E., Georgieff, N., Philibert, B., Dallery, J., Marie-Cardine, M., & Collet, L. (2001). Abnormal peripheral auditory asymmetry in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 70, 88-94.
  201. Veuillet, E., Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., Thai-Van, H., & Collet, L. (2007). Auditory processing disorder in children with reading disabilities: effect of audiovisual training. Brain. (In Press).
  202. Warr, W. B., Guinan, J. J., White, J. S. (1986). Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea. Raven Press ;  New York.
  203. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392-393.
  204. Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223, 30-36.
  205. Watson, B. U. & Miller, T. K. (1993). Auditory perception, phonological processing and reading ability/disability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36 (4), 850-863.
  206. Wible, B., Nicol, T., & Kraus, N. (2002). Abnormal neural encoding of repeated speech stimuli in noise in children with learning problems, Clinical Neurophysiology 113 (4), 485-494.
  207. Wood, N. L., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 255-260.
  208. Zahn, R., Huber, W., Drews, E., Erberich, S., Kring, T., Klaus Willmes, K., & Schwarz, M. (2000). Hemispheric lateralization at different levels of human auditory word processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 287, 195-198.
  209. Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 37-46.
  210. Zeng, F. G., Martino, K. M., Linthicium, F. H., & Soli, S. D. (2000). Auditory perception in vestibular neurectomy subjects. Hearing Research, 142, 102-112.
  211. Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario F. X., & Lorenzi, C. (2005). Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment. PNAS. 102(39), 14110-14115.
  212. Zwitserlood, P. (1989).The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word recognition. Cognition, 32, 25-64.