Bibliographie

Références Bibliographiques

  1. Aamodt, A. & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39-59.
  2. Algers, S., Bernauer, E., Boero, M., Breheret, L., Di Taranto, C., Dougherty, M., Fox, K. & Gabard, J.-F. (1997). Review of Micro-Simulation Models. (Report N°. SMARTEST/D3), Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
  3. Allen, T. M., Lunenfeld, H. & Alexander, G. J. (1971). Driver information needs. Highway Research Record, 366, 102-115.
  4. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical Universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Anderson, J. R. & Lebière, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Anolli, L., Duncan, S., Magnusson, M. S. & Riva, G. (2005). The Hidden Structure of Interaction: From Neurons to Culture Patterns. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  7. Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffring, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (Ed), The psychology of learning ans motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
  8. Avouris, N., Komis, V., Fiotakis, G., Margaritis, M. & Voyiatzaki, E. (2005). Logging of fingertip actions is not enough for analysis of learning activities. Usage analysis in learning system AIED’05 Workshop.
  9. Bachimont, B. (1996). Herméneutique matérielle et Artéfacture : des machines qui pensent aux machines qui donnent à penser ; Critique du formalisme en intelligence artificielle. Thèse de doctorat d'épistémologie, Ecole Polythechnique, Paris.
  10. Bachimont, B. (2000). Engagement sémantique et engagement ontologique : conception et réalisation d'ontologies en Ingénierie des connaissances. In J. Charlet, M. Zacklad, G. Kassel and D. Bourigault (Ed), Ingénierie des connaissances, évolutions récentes et nouveaux défis (pp. 16). Paris: Eyrolles.
  11. Bachimont, B. (2004). Pourquoi n'y-a-t-il pas d'expérience en ingénierie des connaissances? Proceedings of IC2004. Lyon.
  12. Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. In G. Bower (Ed), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
  13. Badre, A. & Santos, P. (1991). Chime: A knowledge based Computer Human interaction Monitoring Engine. Georgia Institute of Technology.
  14. Bailly, B. (2004). Conscience de la situation des conducteurs: Aspects fondamentaux, méthodes et application pour la formation des conducteurs. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon.
  15. Baker, M. & Carter, M. (1997). Development of a Lane Changing Algorithm for Evaluating the Impact of ICC. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
  16. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Baumann, M. & Krems, J. (2005). Situation awareness and driving: a cognitive model of memory update-processes. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments. Ispra, Italy.
  18. Bellet, T. (1998). Modélisation et simulation cognitive de l'opérateur humain: une application à la conduite automobile. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris V, Paris.
  19. Bellet, T. (2006). Driving activity analysis and modelling for adaptive collision avoidance systems design. Proceedings of the 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 10-14 july 2006. Maastricht.
  20. Bellet, T. & Tattegrain-Veste, H. (1999). A framework for representing driving knowledge. International journal of cognitive ergonomics, 3(1), 37-49.
  21. Bernard, M. L., Forsythe, J. C., Allender, L., Cohn, J., Radvansky, G. & Ritter, F. E. (2007). The next generation of cognitive modeling tools: Opportunities, challenges and basic needs. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  22. Berthoz, A. & Petit, J.-L. (2006). Phénoménologie et Physiologie de l’Action. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  23. Bertin, J. (1999). Sémiologie graphique: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences.
  24. Bisseret, A. (1970). Mémoire opérationnelle et structure de travail. Bulletin de Psychologie, XXIV(5/6), 280-294.
  25. Bisseret, A. (1995). Représentation et décision experte, psychologie cognitive de la décision chez les aiguilleurs du ciel.Toulouse: Octarès.
  26. Boer, E. R. (1996). Tangent point oriented curve negotiation. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 7-12).
  27. Boer, E. R. (2000). Behavioral Entropy as an Index for Workload. Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomic society. San Diego, CA.
  28. Bouaud, J. (1989). K un Langage pour l'Implémentation d'Outils de Représentation des Connaissances. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 7, Paris.
  29. Boy, G. (2005). Maturité, Automation et Experience des Utilisateurs. Actes du Colloque National d'Interaction Homme-Machine. Toulouse, France: ACM-Press.
  30. Brassac, C. (2003). Lev, Ignace, Jerome et les autres... Vers une perspective constructiviste en psychologie interactionniste. Technologies, Idéologies et Pratiques: revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, 15(1), 195-214.
  31. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual Readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
  32. Cacciabue, P. C. & Re, C. (2004). Synthesis of models and approaches for cognitive representation of Joint cognitive models of DVE. (7ERT-050301-E1-DA), Human Center Design for Information Society Technologies.
  33. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. & Newell, A. (1986). The model human processor- An engineering model of human performance. Handbook of perception and human performance, 2(45), 1-35.
  34. Cardon, A. (2004). Modéliser et concevoir une machine pensante : Approche de la conscience artificielle. Paris: Vuibert.
  35. Carsten, O. (2002). Development of experimental protocol. (Delivrable 1), HASTE (Human Machine Interface And the Safety of Traffic in Europe).
  36. Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory: Oxford University Press.
  37. Champin, P.-A. (2003). Modéliser l'expérience pour en assister la réutilisation: de la Conception Assistée par Ordinateur au Web Sémantique. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lyon 1, Lyon.
  38. Champin, P.-A., Prié, Y. & Mille, A. (2004). Musette: a framework for Knowledge Capture from Experience. Proceedings of EGC04. Clermont-Ferrand.
  39. Charlet, J. (2002). L'ingénierie des connaissances. Développements, résultats et perspectives pour la gestion des connaissances médicales. Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches, l'Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris.
  40. Charlet, J. & Bachimont, B. (1998). De l'acquisition à l'ingénierie des connaissances : applications et perspectives. Assises nationales du PRC-13.
  41. Clancey, W. (1993). Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 87-116.
  42. Clancey, W. (2007). Scientific Antecedents of Situated Cognition. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Ed), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: PUF.
  44. Cohen, M. A., Ritter, F. E. & Haynes, S. R. (2005). Herbal: A high-level language and development environment for developing cognitive models in Soar. 14th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (pp. 177-182). Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida.
  45. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
  46. Cooper, R. & Fox, J. (1998). A visual design environment for cognitive modelling. Behevior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 553-564.
  47. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163-191.
  48. Cram, D. (2007). Visualisation de Traces: Application aux Traces Réflexives d'eLycée. Mémoire de Master, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon.
  49. Cuntoor, N., Yegnanarayana, B. & Chellappa, R. (2005). Interpretation of State Sequences in HMM for Activity Representation. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Philadelphia.
  50. Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes' Error. NY: Grosset/Putnam.
  51. Dapzol, N. (2003). Méthodologie d'analyse des situations de conduite. Mémoire de DEA, Inrets, Bron.
  52. Dapzol, N. (2006). Analyse de l'activité de conduite par les chaînes de Markov cachées et les modèles de ruptures multiphasiques: méthodologie et applications. Thèse de doctorat, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon.
  53. Delacour, J. (1989). Biologie de la conscience: Presses Universitaires de France.
  54. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  55. Dreyfus, H. (2004). A Phenomenology of Skill Acquisition as the basis for a Merleau-Pontian Non-representationalist Cognitive Science.
  56. Durand, G. (2007). Des événements aux objets La méthode d’abtsraction extensive chez A.N. Whitehead. Frankfurt / Paris / Lancaster: Ontols Verlag.
  57. Eco, U. (1997). Kant et l'ornithorynque. Paris: Grasset.
  58. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
  59. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  60. Ey, H. (1999). Conscience. Encyclopaedia Universalis.
  61. Falzon, P. (1989). Ergonomie Cognitive du Dialogue. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
  62. Fayyad, U. (1996). From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Database. AI Magazine, 17(3), 37-54.
  63. Fuller, R. A. (1984). Conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance. Ergonomics, 27(11), 1139-1155.
  64. Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubezy, M., Erikson, H., Noy, N. F. & Tu, S. W. (2003). The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1), 89-123.
  65. Georgeon, O. (2004). Capter l'expérience de conduite en situation réelle en vue de la modélisation cognitive du conducteur. Mémoire de DEA, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Bron.
  66. Greeno (1976). The structure of memory and the process of solving problems. In R. L. Solso (Ed), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology. Washington, DC: Winston.
  67. Groeger, J. (2000). Understanding driving. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  68. Guérin, F., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J. & Kerguelen, A. (1997). Comprendre le travail pour le transformer, La pratique de l’ergonomie. Lyon-Montrouge: ANACT.
  69. Guzdial, M., Santos, P. & Badre, A. (1994). Analyzing and visualizing log files: A computational science of usability. HCI Consortium Workshop.
  70. Haué, J.-B. (2005). Comparing distributed cognition and course of action: An application to car driving. EACE 2005. Chania, Cretes.
  71. Henning, M. J., Georgeon, O. & Krems, J. (2007). The quality of behavioral and environmental indicators used to infer the intention to change lanes. 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment. Stevenson, Washington USA.
  72. Henning, M. J., Schweigert., M., Baumann, M. & Krems, J. F. (2006). Eye-glance patterns during lane change manoeuvres. 11th conference on Vision in Vehicles. Dublin, Ireland.
  73. Henri, F. & Maina, M. (2007). Pour une meilleure intégration de l’utilisateur dans le processus de conception et d’évaluation des outils TELOS. Quatrième conférence annuelle du réseau de chercheurs LORNET - I2LOR 2007.
  74. Hilbert, D. M. & Redmiles, D. F. (2000). Extracting Usability Information from User Interface Events. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 32(4), 384–421.
  75. Hoc, J.-M. (2004). Psychologie ergonomique: tendances actuelles. Paris: Presses universitaires de france.
  76. Hollnagel, E. & Woods, D. D. (1983). Cognitive systems engineering: New wine in new bottles. International journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 583-600.
  77. Hollnagel, E. & Woods, D. D. (2005). Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press.
  78. Hongeng, S., Brémond, F. & Nevatia, R. (2000). Representation and Optimal Recognition of Human Activities. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
  79. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology.
  80. Janssen, W. (2004). Inventory of available tools and methodologies for driver behaviour analysis. (Report N°. 2TNO-040914-M1-DA), HUMANIST.
  81. John, B. E. & Kieras, D. E. (1996). The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques: Comparison and Contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 3, pp320-351.
  82. Kerguelen, A. (1997). The Kronos Software : a tool for work activity analysis. 13th Triennal Congress of International Ergonomics Association (pp. 240-247). Tampere, Finlande.
  83. Kerguelen, A. (1998). Quels outils concevoir pour aider au relevé d'observation sur le terrain ? XXXIIIème Congrès de la SELF, "Temps de travail" (pp. 870-813). Paris.
  84. Kokar, M. M., Matheus, C. J. & Baclawski, K. (2007). Ontology-based situation awareness. Information Fusion.
  85. Krajzewicz, D., Kühne, R. & Wagner, P. (2004). A Car Driver's Cognition Model. ITS Safety&Security. Miami Beach, Florida, USA.
  86. Krajzewicz, D. & Wagner, P. (2002). ACME (A Common Mental Environment) - Driver A Cognitive Car Driver Model. 16th Simulation Multiconference "Modelling and Simulation 2002", SCS Europe 2002 (pp. 689-693). Darmstadt / Germany.
  87. Labayrade, R. & Aubert, D. (2003). A single framework for vehicle roll, pitch, yaw estimation and obstacles detection by stereovision. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (pp. 9-11). Columbus, USA.
  88. Ladrière, J. (1999). Représentation et connaissance. Encyclopédie universalis.
  89. Laird, J. E., Gongdon, C. B. & Coulter, K. J. (1999). The Soar User's Manual Version 8.2: University of Michigan.
  90. Lalande, A. (1985). Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  91. Land, M. & Lee, D. N. (1995). Which part of the road guide steering? Nature, 377, 339-340.
  92. Lassègue, J. & Visetti, Y.-M. (2002). Que reste-t-il de la représentation ? Intellectica, 2(35), 7-25.
  93. Le Moigne, J.-L. (1995). Les épistémologies constructivistes: PUF.
  94. Le Ny, J.-F. (1985). Comment se représenter les représentations? Psychologie Française, 30(3/4), 231-237.
  95. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
  96. Leontiev, A. N. (1984). Activité, conscience, personnalité. Moscou: Edition du progrès.
  97. Leplat, J. (1980). La psychologie ergonomique. Paris: PUF.
  98. Leplat, J. (1985). Erreur humaine, fiabilité humaine dans le travail: Collection Universitaire.
  99. Leplat, J. (2002). De l'étude de cas à l'analyse de l'activité. Pistes, 4(2), 1-31.
  100. Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140(55).
  101. Liu, A. & Pentland, A. P. (1997). Towards Real-Time Recognition of Driver Intention. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference. Boston, MA.
  102. Lohse, G., Biolsi, K., Walkers, N. & Rueter, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communication of the ACM (pp. 36-49).
  103. MacAdam, C. (2003). Understanding and Modeling the Human Driver. Vehicle Systems Dynamics, 40, pp 101-134.
  104. Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering Hidden Time Patterns in Behavior: T-Patterns and their Detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32(1), pp. 93-110.
  105. Maincent, A. & Fornengo, S. (2003). Manuel de l'utilisateur du DB3. (Contrat Renault Trucks 1326).
  106. Malec, J. & Per, S. (1996). Driver Support System for Traffic Manoeuvres. In M. B. G. Ambrosino, M. Boero (Ed), Artificial Intelligence Applications to Traffic Engineering (pp. 283-318). VSP International Science Publishers.
  107. Marmaras, N. & Nathanael, D. (2005). Cognitive engineering practice: melting theory into reality. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(2), 109-127.
  108. Mars, F. (2006). Driving in curves with constrained gaze orientation in the vicinity of the tangent point. 11th International Conference on Vision In Vehicles. Dublin (Irlande).
  109. Mathern, B. (2006). Analyser l’activité de conduite automobile: méthodologie et atelier logiciel associé. Mémoire de Master, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon1, Lyon.
  110. Mayenobe, P. (2004). Perception de l'environnement pour une gestion contextualisée de la coopération homme-machine. Thèse de doctorat, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand.
  111. McCall, J., Wipf, D., Trivedi, M. & Rao, B. D. (2004). Lane Change Intent Analysis Using Robust Operators and Sparse Bayesian Learning. University of California.
  112. McKnight, A. J. & Adams, B. B. (1970). Driver education and task analysis volume 1: Task descriptions. Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Bureau.
  113. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
  114. Meyer, D. E. & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A Computational Theory of Executive Cognitive Processes and Multiple-Task Performance: Part 1. Basic mechaninsms. Psychological Review, 104, pp 3-65.
  115. Michon, J.-A. (1985). A Critical View of Driver Behaviour Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? In L. Evans and R. C. Schwing (Ed), Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety. New York: Plenum Press.
  116. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Bruxelles Paris: De Boeck.
  117. Mille, A. (2006). Raisonner à Partir de l'Expérience Tracée. In S. Eddie (Ed), Le storytelling : concepts, outils et applications. Hermes Science.
  118. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minor two; some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
  119. Milner, B. (1966). Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. In C. W. M. Whitty and O. L. Zangwill (Ed), Amnesia (pp. 109-133). London, UK: Butterworths.
  120. Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed), The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211-277). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
  121. Montmollin, M. d. (1990). L'ergonomie. Paris: La Découverte.
  122. Näätänen, R. & Summala, H. (1976). A model for the role of motivational factors in driver's decision-making. Accident analysis and prevention, 6, 243-621.
  123. Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, pp 87-127.
  124. Nicolas, S. (2003). La psychologie de W. Wundt: L'Harmattan.
  125. Norman, D. A. (1976). Memory and Attention. New York: Wiley.
  126. Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro (Ed), Consciousness and Self-Regulation (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
  127. Novick, L. R. & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, Network, or Hierarchy : That is the Question,. Cognitive Psychology, 42, pp. 158-216.
  128. Ochanine, V. A. (1977). Concept of operative image in engineering and general psychology. In B. F. Lomov, V. F. Rubakhin and V. F. Venda (Ed), Engineering Psychology. Moscow: Science Publisher.
  129. Oliver, N., Horvitz, E. & Garg, A. (2002). Layered Representations for Human Activity Recognition. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 3-8).
  130. Oliver, N. & Pentland, A. P. (2000). Graphical Models for Driver Behavior Recognition in a SmartCar. IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Vehicles. Detroit. Michigan.
  131. Ollanier-Beldame, M. (2006). Traces d’interactions et processus cognitifs en activité conjointe :Le cas d’une co-rédaction médiée par un artefact numérique. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon.
  132. Olsen, E. C. B. (2003). Modeling Slow Lead Vehicle Lane Changing.Thèse de doctorat, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA.
  133. Ombredane, A. & Faverge, J.-M. (1955). L'analyse du travail. Paris: PUF.
  134. Pereira, M., Hamama, H., Bruyas, M.-P. & Simoes, A. (2008). Effect of additional tasks in driving performance: Comparison between three groups of drivers. European Conference on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems. Lyon.
  135. Perterson, L. R. & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individiual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
  136. Pettitt, M., Burnett, G. & Karbassioun, D. (2006). Applying the Keystroke Level Model in a Driving Context. Ergonomics Society Annual meeting. Cambridge.
  137. Piaget, J. (1937-1977). La construction du réel chez l'enfant. Delachaux: Nestlé.
  138. Piaget, J. (1967). Logique et connaissance scientifique: Gallimard.
  139. Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S. & Schneiderman, B. (1996). Life Lines: Visualizing personal histories. ACM CHI '96. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  140. Popper, K. (1979). La connaissance objective, une approche évolutionniste: Flamarion.
  141. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.
  142. Rabardel, P., Carlin, N., Chesnais, M., Lang, N., Le Joliff, G. & Pascal, M. (1998). Ergonomie concepts et méthodes. Toulouse, France: Octares Editions.
  143. Raskin, J. (2000). The Human Interface. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  144. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, Rules and knowledge; Signals, Signs and Symbols and other Distinctions in Human Performance Models. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257-266.
  145. Rennard, J.-P. (2002). Introduction à la vie artificielle: Vuibert.
  146. Richard, J.-F. (1990). Les activités mentales. Comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions. Paris: Armand Colin.
  147. Richard, J.-F., Bonnet, C. & Ghiglione, R. (1990). Le traitement de l'information symbolique.
  148. Ricoeur, P. (1999). Ontologie. Encyclopaedia Universalis.
  149. Ritter, F. E., Haynes, S. R., Cohen, M. A., Howes, A., John, B. E., Best, B., Lebière, C., Jones, R. M., Crossman, J., Lewis, R. L., Saint Amaint, R., McBride, S. P., Urbas, L., Leuchter, S. & Vera, A. (2006). High-level Behavior Representation Languages Revisited. Seventh International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM) (pp. 404-407). Trieste, Italy: Edizioni Goliardiche.
  150. Ritter, F. E., Kukreja, U. & Saint Amaint, R. (2006). Including a model of Visual Processing with a Cognitive Architecture to Model a Simple Teleoperation Task. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.
  151. Ritter, F. E. & Larkin, J. H. (1994). Using process models to summarize sequences of human actions. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 345-383.
  152. Ritter, F. E., Van Rooy, D., Saint Amant, R. & Simpson, K. (2006). Providing user models direct access to interfaces: An exploratory study of a simple interface with implications for HRI and HCI. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part a: Systems and Humans, 36(3), 592-601.
  153. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on schemas for stories. In D. G. Bobrow and A. Collins (Ed), Representation and understanding: studies in cognitive sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  154. Saint Amant, R., McBride, S. P. & Ritter, F. E. (2007). AI support for building cognitive models. Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06) (pp. 1663-1666). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  155. Salvucci, D. D. (2004). Inferring driver intent: A case study in lane-change detection. Human Factors Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting.
  156. Salvucci, D. D., Boer, E. R. & Liu, A. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Record, 1779, 9-16.
  157. Salvucci, D. D. & Gray, R. (2004). A Two-Point Visual Control Model of Steering. Perception, 33(10), 1233-1248.
  158. Salvucci, D. D. & Lee, F. J. (2003). Simple Cognitive Modeling in a Complex Cognitive Architecture. Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press.
  159. Salvucci, D. D. & Liu, A. (2002). The time course of a lane change: Driver control and eye-movement behavior. Transportation Research, F(5), 123-132.
  160. Sanderson, P. M. & Fisher, C. A. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations. Human -Computer Interaction, 9, 251-317.
  161. Sanderson, P. M., McNeese, M. D. & Zaff, B. S. (1994). Handling complex real-word data with two cognitive engineering tools: COGENT and MacSHAPA. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26, 117-124.
  162. Sawaragi, T. & Murasawa, K. (2001). Simulating behaviors of human situation awareness under high workloads. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15, 365-381.
  163. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory : a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people: Cambridge University Press.
  164. Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  165. Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, pp 1-66.
  166. Settouti, L. S., Prié, Y., Mille, A. & Marty, J.-C. (2006). Systèmes à base de trace pour l’apprentissage humain. colloque international TICE 2006 «Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication dans l'Enseignement Supérieur et l'Entreprise» (pp. 1-15). Toulouse.
  167. Sime, M. E., Fitter, M. J. & Green, T. R. G. (1975). Why is programming computers so hard? New Behaviour, 1, 378-381.
  168. Simon, H. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  169. Sperandio, J.-C. (1980). La psychologie en ergonomie. Paris: PUF.
  170. Sperandio, J.-C. & Wolff, M. (2003). Formalisme de modélisation pour l'analyse du travail et l'ergonomie. Paris: PUF.
  171. Steels, L. (2003). Intelligence with representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A 361(1811), 2381-2395.
  172. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  173. Sukthankar, R., Ed. (1997). Situation Awareness for Tactical Driving. Robotics Institute. Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Carnegie Mellon University.
  174. Sutherland, S. (1989). Consciousness.
  175. Tango, F. & Montanari, R. (2004). Modelling Traffic and Real Situations. Workshop of HUMANIST. Ispra.
  176. Tattegrain-Veste, H., Bellet, T., Chanut, O. & Legorrec, G. (2002). UML et génération de code: application à la modélisation cognitive du conducteur automobile. Génie Logiciel, 60(23-31).
  177. Tattegrain-Veste, H., Bruyas, M.-P., Bellet, T., Forzy, J., Simoes, A., Carvalhais, J., Lockwood, P., Boudy, J., Baligant, B., Damiani, S. & Opitz, M. (2004). Vers une gestion centralisée des informations vocales en fonction du contexte de conduite : le projet cemvocas. Recherche Transports Sécurité, 82.
  178. Tiberghien, G. (1990). Contraintes Structurales ef Fonctionnelles des systèmes de traitement. In J.-F. Richard, C. Bonnet and R. Ghiglione (Ed), Le traitement de l'information symbolique (pp. 3-32). Paris: Dunod.
  179. Torkkola, K., Venkatesan, S. & Liu, H. (2004). Sensor Selection for Maneuver Classification. The 7th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC2004). Washington DC.
  180. Trémeaux, J.-M. (2005). Atelier d'analyse de l'activité de conduite à partir de données descriptives.
  181. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. MA: Addison-Weslay.
  182. Van der Molen, H. H. & Bötticher, M. T. (1988). A hierarchical risk model for traffic participants. Ergonomics, 31(4), 537-555.
  183. Van Elslande, P. (2001). Erreurs de conduite et besoin d'aide: une approche accidentologique. Journées d'étude en Psychologie ergonomique. Nantes.
  184. Vermersch, P. (1978). Une problématique théorique en psychologie du travail: essais d'application des théories de J. Piaget à l'analyse du fonctinnement cognitif de l'adulte. Le travail humain, 41(2), 265-278.
  185. Vermersch, P. (1996). L'expliciation de l'action. Les cahiers de linguistique sociale, 113-120.
  186. Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.
  187. Weill-Fassina, A., Rabardel, P. & Dubois, D. (1993). Représentations pour l'action. Toulouse: Octares.
  188. Weir, D. & Chao, K. (2005). Review of control theory models for directional and speed control. International Workshop On Modelling Driver Behaviour In Automative Environments (pp. 25-37). Ispra, Italy.
  189. Wexelblat, A. (1999). History-Rich Tools for Social Navigation. Hawaii Internation Conference On System Sciences. Hawaii.
  190. Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature: Cambridge University Press.
  191. Wickens, C. D. & Hollands, J. G. (1984). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance: Prentice Hall.
  192. Wilson, J. R. & Corlett, E. N. (2005). Evaluation of Human Work: CRC Press.
  193. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Investigations philosophiques.
  194. Woods, D. D. & Roth, E. M. (1988). Cogntive systems engineering. In M. Helander (Ed), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 3-43). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  195. Wynn, T., Georgeon, O., Henning, M. J., Richardson, J. H., Bellet, T. & Krems, J. (2008). Cognitive activity modelling: a case study of lane change schemas and sensation seeking. European Conference on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems. Lyon, France.
  196. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. J Consult. Clin. Psychol., 36, 45-52.