References

1. Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-16.
2. André, J.B., & Day, T. (2007). Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma. J Theor Biol, 247, 11-22.
3. Axelrod, R. (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
4. Baker, C. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Saxe, R. R. (2006). Bayesian Models of Human Action Understanding. In Y. Weiss, B. Scholkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 18, pp. 99-106), MIT Press.
5. Baker, C. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Saxe, R. R. (2007). Goal Inference as Inverse Planning, In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
6. Becchio, C., Sartori, L., Bulgheroni, M., & Castiello, U. (2008). The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention, Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 557-64.
7. Blakemore, S. J., & Decéty, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 561-567.
8. Blakemore S. J., & Frith, U. (2004). How does the brain deal with the social world? Neuroreport, 15, 119-28.
9. Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S., & Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: inferential processes vs. action simulation. Current Biology, 17, 2117-2121.
10. Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U. & Frith, C. D. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12, 314-325.
13. Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. G., & Walter, H. (2007). The intentional network: how the brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3105-13.
14. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of 'pure reason' in infancy. Cognition, 26, 237-67.
15. Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). 'Obsessed with goals': functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychol, 124, 60-78.
16. de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I., & Bekkering H (2008). Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology, 25, 454-7.
17. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Pers Soc Psychol, 82, 878-902.
18. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36-46.
19. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17, 724-32.
20. Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2007). Social grooming in the kindergarten: the emergence of flattery behavior. Developmental Science,10, 255-265.
21. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 596-609.
22. Gallese, V., & Goldmann, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci, 2, 493-501.
23. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 396-403.
24. Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102, 415-433.
25. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron, 36, 299-308.
26. Goldman, A. I., & Sebanz, N. (2005). Simulation, mirroring, and a different argument from error. Trends Cogn Sci, 9, 320.
27. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. (1994). The theory theory. In Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. (1992). Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind and Language, 7, 145-71.
29. Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representation in humans by positron emission tomography: 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 103-111.
30. Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci, 26, 590-616.
31. Grèzes, J., & Decéty, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19.
32. Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition, In Ron Sun (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational cognitive modelling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behaviour. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259
34. Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends Cogn Sci, 9, 21-25.
35. Jacob, P. (2008). What do mirror neurons contribute to human social cognition? Mind and Language, 23, 190-223.
36. Jacob, P. (2009). The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: a critique. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 229-43.
37. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, 103-109.
38. Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, simulation, and self-identification. Mind and Language, 19, 113-146.
39. Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2007). Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci, 11, 194-6.
40. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007a). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn Process, 8, 159-66.
41. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007b). The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. Neuroreport, 18, 619-23.
42. King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308, 78-83.
43. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philos Trans R Soc B, 363, 2021-31.
44. Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci, 10, 319-26.
45. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: the origins of “theory of mind”. Psychologica l Review, 94, 412-42
46. Mamassian, P., & Goutcher, R. (2001). Prior knowledge on the illumination position. Cognition, 81, B1-9.
47. Mele, A. (1992). Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior, Oxford University Press.
48. Mitchell,J. P. (2005). The false dichotomy between simulation and theory-theory: the argument's error. Trends Cogn Sci, 9, 363-364.
49. Nachmias, J. (1981). On the psychometric function for contrast detection. Vision Research, 21, 215-223.
50. Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: an integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds, Oxford University Press.
51. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
52. Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). 15-month-old infants detect violations in pretend scenarios. A cta Psychol, 124, 106-28.
53. Oztop, E., Wolpert, D., & Kawato, M. (2005). Mental state inference using visual control parameters. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 129-151.
54. Pacherie, E. (2000). The content of intentions. Mind and Language, 15, 400-432.
55. Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework. Cognition, 107, 179-217.
56. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation , University of Michigan Press.
57. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
58. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Neurosci Rev,2, 661-670.
59. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, 27, 169-92.
60. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci, 10, 70-6.
61. Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2009). Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psycho Bull Rev, 16, 70-5.
62. Saxe, R. (2005). Against simulation: the argument from error. Trends Cogn Sci, 9, 174-9.
63. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci, 4, 299-309.
64. Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press.
65. Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.
66. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. N ature, 439, 466-9.
67. Ybarra, O. (2002). Naive causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing. Pychol Bull, 128, 421-41.
68. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1293-1313.