Bibliographie

Adam, J.M. (1985). Le texte narratif, précis d'analyse textuelle, Poitiers: Fernand Nathan.
Adam, J.M. (1992). Les textes : types et prototypes. Récit, description, argumentation, explication et dialogue, Nathan université, Série Linguistique, Paris: Nathan.
Adam, J.M. et Revaz, F. (1996). L’analyse des récits, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Aisenman, R. et Assayag, N. (1999). Fact and fiction in evaluating narrative evaluation, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 38-57.
Aisenman, R. et Berman, R. (2000). Rethinking lexical analysis, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 3, 187-196.
Aksu-Koç, A. et Küntay, A. (2001). Reformulating causal relations while retelling narratives: evidence from Turkish, Colloque Acquisition et construction du sens dans une perspective interlangue Paris.
Alamargot, D. et Chanquoy, L. (2002). Les modèles de rédaction de textes, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 45-65, Paris: Lavoisier.
Alamargot, D., Chanquoy, L. et Chuy, M. (2005). L’élaboration du contenu du texte : de la mémoire à long terme à l’environnement de la tâche, Psychologie Française, 50, 287-304.
Alamargot, D., Lambert, E. et Chanquoy, L. (2005). La production écrite et ses relations avec la mémoire, Approche Neuropsychologique des Acquisitions de l’Enfant, 17, 41-46.
Allal, L., Chanquoy, L. et Largy, P. (2004). Revision: Cognitive and Instructional Processes, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Allen, S. (1997). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for the subject-object asymmetry in early null arguments: The Principle of Informativeness revisited, Paper presented at the GALA '97 Conference on Language Acquisition, University of Edinburgh.
Allen, S. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut, Linguistics, 38, 483-521.
Allen, S. (2007). Interacting pragmatic influences on children’s argument realization, In Bowerman, M., Brown, P. (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 191-210, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Allen, S. et Schröder, H. (2003). Preferred Argument Structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11-60, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Allen, S., Skarabela, B. et Hughes, M. (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntaxe, Trends in language acquisition research, Corpora in language acquisition research, 6.
Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of mind, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaul Associates.
Anglin, J. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis, Monographs oh the society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1-165.
Aparici, M., Tolchinsky, L. et Rosado, E. (2000). On defining longer Units in narrative and expository Spanish texts, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 3, 95-122.
Argerich, N. et Tolchinsky, L. (2000). On a definition of lexical items in written and spoken texts, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 3, 197-204.
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun Phrases Antecedents, London: Routledge.
Ariel, M. (1996). Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction, In Fretheim, T., Gundel, J. (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility, 13-37, Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
Arnold, J. (2003). Multiple constraint on reference form: Null, pronominal, and full reference in Mapudungun, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 225-272, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. et Galmiche, M. (1986). La grammaire d'aujourd'hui, Flammarion.
Ashby, W. et Bentivoglio, P. (1993). Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish, Language Variation and Change, 5, 61-76.
Ashby, W. et Bentivoglio, P. (2003). A comparative diachronic analysis of French and Spanish , In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 61-81, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Atkinson, R. et Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, In Spence, K. (eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 2, 89-185, New York: Academic Press.
Atkinson, R. et Shiffrin, R. (1971). The control of short-term memory, Scientific American, 225, 82-90.
Auduc, J.L. et Bayard-Pierlot, J. (1995). Le système éducatif français. Les guides de l'école, 4ème édition, Académie de Créteil: CRPD (Centre Régional de Documentation Pédagogique).
Auer, P. (2009). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language, Language Sciences, 31, 1-13.
Baddeley, A. et Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory, In Bower, G. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 47-89, New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory, Oxford Oxfordshire, New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1990/1992). La mémoire humaine, Théorie et pratique, Grenoble: Presse Universitaire de Grenoble.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working Memory, Science, 255, 556-559.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
Baddeley, A. (2001). Is working memory still working?, American Psychologist, 56, 849-864.
Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships, Linguistics, 24, 227-284.
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives: learning to use language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bartlett, E. (1984). Anaphoric reference in written narratives of good and poor elementary school writers, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 540–552.
Bassano, D., Maillochon, I., Klampfer, S. et Dressler, W. (2001). L’acquisition de la morphologie verbale à travers les langues, Enfance, 53, 81-99.
Bates, E. (2004). Explaining and interpreting deficits in language development across clinical groups: Where do we go from here? , Brain and Language, 88, 248–253.
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A. et Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: a croos-linguistic study, Cognition, 11, 245-299.
Bates, E. et McWhinney, B. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Begnet, Z. (2007). Étude des pauses en production écrite, Mémoire de M2, Université de lyon.
Bellert, I. (1971). On a condition of the coherence of texts, Semiotica, 4, 253-288.
Benoît, J. et Fayol, M. (1989). Le développement de la catégorisation des textes, Pratiques, 62, 71-85.
Bentivoglio, P. (1996). Acquisition of Preferred Argument Structure in Venezuelan Spanish., seventh international congress for the study of child language Istanbul, Turkie.
Benton, S., Kraft, R., Glover, J. et Plake, B. (1984). Cognitive Capacity Differences Among Writers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 820-834.
Bereiter, C., Burtis, P. et Scardamalia, M. (1988). Cognitive Operations in Constructing Main Points in Written Composition, Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 261-278.
Bereiter, C. et Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, M. et Scardamalia, C. (1998). L'expertise en lecture-rédaction, In Piolat, A., Pélissier, A. (eds.), La rédaction de textes, Approche cognitive, 13-50, Lausanne: Delachaux et niestlé.
Berman, R. (1995). Narrative competence and storytelling performance: how children tell stories in different contexts, Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5, 285–313.
Berman, R. (1997). Preliterate knowledge of language, In Portecovo, C. (eds.), Writing development : an interdisciplinary view, 61-76, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Berman, R. (1998). Typological perspectives on connectivity, In Penner, Z., Dittmar, N. (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 203-224, Bern: Peter Lang.
Berman, R. (1999a). Form/function relations in narrative, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 80-92.
Berman, R. (1999b). Genre and modality in developing discourse abilities, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 1, 93-113.
Berman, R. (2000). Thematic perspectives on how children talk about interpersonal conflict, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 3, 65-76.
Berman, R. (Eds.) (2001). Setting the narrative scene: how children begin to tell a story, Vol. 10. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Berman, R. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition, In Berman, R. (eds.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, Vol. 3, 9-34, Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
Berman, R. (2005a). Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages, Journal of pragmatics, 37, 105-124.
Berman, R. (2005b). Preface, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 103-104.
Berman, R. (2006). Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence, In Hoff, E., Shatz, M. (eds.), Handbook of Language Development, 92-111, Blackwell.
Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of text construction, Journal of Child Language, 35, 1-37.
Berman, R. et Katzenberger, I. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective, Discourse Processes, 381, 57-94.
Berman, R. et Nir-Sagiv, B. (2004). Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development, Journal of Child Language, 31, 339-380.
Berman, R. et Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox, Discourse Processes, 43, 79-120.
Berman, R., Ragnarsdottir, H. et Strömqvist, S. (2002). Discourse stance, Written Languages and Literacy, 5, 255-290.
Berman, R. et Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user oral and written text construction across adolescence, In Olson, D., Torrance, N. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, 92-111, Cambridge University Press.
Berman, R. et Slobin, D. (1994a). Narrative structure, In Berman, R., Slobin, D. (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistics developmental study, 39-84, Hillsdall, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, R. et Slobin, D. (1994b). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Berman, R. et Strömqvist, S. (1999). Typological perspectives on developing literacy, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 21-22.
Berman, R. et Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing, Written Language and Literacy, 5, Vol.1.
Berman, R. et Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing, Written Language and Literacy, 5, Vol.2.
Bernicot, J., Lacroix, A. et Reilly, J. (2003). La narration chez les enfants atteints du syndrome de Williams : aspects structuraux et pragmatiques, Enfance, 55, 265-281.
Berninger, V., Fuller, F. et Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the life span, Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193-218.
Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, L. et Abbott, R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writting and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades, Reading and Writting : A, Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161-196.
Berninger, V. et Swanson, H. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing, In Carlson, J., Buttterfly, E. (eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, Vol. 2, 57-81, Greenwich: J.A.I. Press.
Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., Brooks, A., Reed, E. et Graham, S. (1997). Treatment of hanwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition, Journal of, 89, 652-666.
Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Begay, C., Coleman, K., Curtin, G., Hawkins, J. et Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone or together : Implications for the simple view of writing, Journal of Educational Psychology , 94, 291-304.
Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Brooks, A., Abbott, S., Reed, L., Rogan, E. et Graham, S. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching spelling units of varying size within a multiple connection framework, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587-605.
Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E. et Abott, R. (1992). Lower level developmental skill in beginning writing, Reading and writing, An interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language, Londres: Routledge et Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1973). Class, codes and control, Applied studies towards a sociology of language, Londres: Routledge et Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1975a). Class, codes and control, Towards a theory of educational transmissions, Londres: Routledge et Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1975b). Langage et classes sociales, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, Theory, research, critique, Edition révisée, Lanham: Rowman et Littlefield.
Bernstein, B. (2007). Pédagogie, contrôle symbolique et identité, Théorie, recherche, critique, Edition française, Lévis: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Berrendonner, A. (1986). Notes sur la contre inférence, Cahiers de linguistique française, 7, 250-277.
Berrendonner, A. (1991). Pour une macro-syntaxe, Travaux de linguistique, Revue internationale de linguistique française, 21, 25-31.
Berrendonner, A. (1994). Anaphores confuses et objets indiscrets, In Schnedecker, C., Charolles, M., Kleiber, G., David, J. (eds.), L’anaphore associative (Aspects linguistiques, psycholinguistiques et automatiques), 209-230, Paris: Klincksieck.
Berrendonner, A. et Reichler Béguelin, M. (1989). Décalages : les niveaux de l’analyse linguistique, Langue Française, 81, 99-125.
Biber, D. (1988). Variations across speech and writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. et Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1983). L’importance du français parlé pour la description du français tout court, Recherches sur le Français Parlé, 5, 23-45.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1985). La langue du dimanche, Reflets, 14, 42-43.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1990). Le français parlé, Paris: Edition du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1995). Le semblable et le dissemblable en syntaxe, Recherches sur le Français Parlé, 13, 7-32.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2000). Approche de la langue parlée en français, Gap: Ophrys.
Bloom, L., Miller, P. et Hood, L. (1975). Variation and reduction in the development of organization in language develpment, In Pick, A. (eds.), Minesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 9, 88-142, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bock, K. et Warren, R. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation, Cognition, 21, 47-67.
Bock, K. et Levelt, W. (1994). Language Production: Grammatical encoding, In Gernsbacher, M. (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 945-984, San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Boersma P. et Weenink D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Programme informatique], site internet : http://www.praat.org/.
Bonin, P. (2003). Production verbale de mots : approche cognitive, Bruxelles: DeBoeck, Université.
Bosch, P. (1985). Constraints, coherence, comprehension, reflexion on anaphora, In Sözer, E. (eds.), Text connexity, text coherence: Aspects, methods, results, 299-319, Hamburg: Buske.
Boscolo, P. (1990). The construction of expository text, First Language, 10, 217-230.
Bourdin, B. (1994). Coût cognitif de la production verbale. Étude comparative oral / écrit chez l’enfant et l’adulte, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Bourgogne.
Bourdin, B. (2002). Gestion de la production et capacité, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 148-169, Paris: Lavoisier.
Bower, G. et Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension, Science, 247, 44-48.
Branigan, H., McLean, J. et Reeve, H. (2003). Something old, something new: addressee knowledge and the given-new contract, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.
Brewer, W. (1980). Literacy theory, rhetoric, and stylistics, implications for psychology. , In Spiro, R., Bruce, B., Brewer, W. (eds.), Theorical issues in reading comprehension, 221-237, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton, B. (1994). Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights, In Gernsbacher, M. (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 641-674, San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, possible worlds, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cahana-Amitay, D. et Berman, R. (1999). Initial ideas on L(onger)-Units, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 114-127.
Caron, J. (1989/2001). Précis de psycholinguistique, Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Cautain, C. (2007). Étude préliminaire des évaluations dans les productions narratives d’élèves de ZEP, Mémoire de Master 2, Université de Lyon.
Cautain, C., Chenu, F. et Jisa, H. (2008). Revisions in the written discourse of French children and adolescents, 11th International Conference of the EARLI-SIG Writing Lund.
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view., In Li, C. (eds.), Subject and topic, 25-55, New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, A., Brooks, P. et Tomasello, M. (2000). Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1337-1349.
Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.N. et Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 10, 513-540.
Chanquoy, L. et Alamargot, D. (2002). Mise en place et développement des traitements rédactionnels : le rôle de la mémoire de travail, Le Langage et L’homme, 38, 171-190.
Charolles, M. (1978). Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes, Langue Française, 38, 7-41.
Charolles, M. (1988). Les études sur la cohérence et la connexité textuelles depuis la fin des années 1960, Modèles Linguistiques, 10, 45-66.
Charolles, M., et Ehrlich, M.F. (1991). Aspects of textual continuity, linguistic approaches, In Denhière, G., Rossi, J.P. (eds.), Text and text processing, 251-267, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Chaudron, C. et Richards, J. (1986). The effects of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures, Applied Linguistics, 7, 113–127.
Chauveau, G. (2000). « Réussir en ZEP : l’exemple de la lecture », Comment réussir en ZEP : vers des zones d’excellence pédagogique, Paris: Retz.
Chesnet, D., Guillabert, F. et Esperet, E. (1994). G-Studio : Un logiciel pour l’étude en temps réel des paramètres temporels de la production écrite, L’Année psychologique, 94, 283-294.
Chesnet, D. et Alamargot, D. (2005). Analyses en temps réel des activités oculaires et graphomotrices du scripteur: intérêt du dispositif 'Eye and Pen', L'Année Psychologique, 105, 477-520.
Cho, S. (2004). Argument ellipsis in Korean-Speaking children’s early speech, Harvard University.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures, The Hague: Mouton.
Clancy, P. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition proceedings of the, Paper presented at the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University.
Clancy, P. (1997). Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean Acquisition, In Sohn, H.M., Haig, J. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 6, 639-59, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Clancy, P. (2003). The lexicon in interaction: developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 81-108, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clark, H. (1996). Using language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. et Haviland, S. (1977). Comprehension and the Given-New contract, In Freedle, R. (eds.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, 1-40, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Clark, H. et Murphy, G. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference, In LeNy, J., Kintsch, W. (eds.), Language and comprehension, 287-299, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Clark, H. et Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to Discourse, Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
Clark, H. et Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process, Cognition, 22, 1-40.
Coirier, P., Gaonac’h, D. et Passerault, J.M. (1996). Psycholinguistique textuelle, Paris: Armand Colin Édition.
Coirier, P., et Marchand, E. (1994). Writing argumentative texts, a typological and structural approach, In Eigler, G., Jechle, T. (eds.), Writing, Current Trends in European Research, 163-181, Freiburg: Hochschul Verlag.
Collectif, (1982). Circulaire n° 81-536 du 28 décembre 1981 (B.O.spécial n°1 du 21-01- 1982).
Collectif, (1989). Apprendre à lire et à écrire : dix ans de recherche sur la lecture et la production des textes, dans la revue française de pédagogie, INRP (Institut National de la Recherche Pédagogique), Paris.
Collectif, (1991). Les cycles à l’école primaire : Une école pour enfant des outils pour les maîtres, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale de la Jeunesse et des Sports et Direction des Écoles, CNDP (Centre National de Recherche Pédagogique), Paris : Hachette École.
Collectif, (1992). La maîtrise de la langue à l’école : Une école pour enfant des outils pour les maîtres, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale et de la Culture et Direction des Écoles, CNDP (Centre National de Recherche Pédagogique), Paris : Savoir Livre.
Collectif, (1994). Lire et écrire à l’école primaire, INRP (Institut National de la Recherche Pédagogique), Paris.
Collectif, (1995). Programmes à l’école primaire : Une école pour enfant des outils pour les maîtres, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale et Direction des Écoles, CNDP (Centre National de Recherche Pédagogique), Paris : Savoir Livre.
Collectif, (1997). La maîtrise de la langue au collège, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Direction des lycées et des collèges CNDP (Centre National de Recherche Pédagogique), Paris : Savoir Livre.
Collectif, (1997). Le système éducatif de la France, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche et de la Technologie, Réimprimé avec l’autorisation du CRDP (Centre Régional de Documentation Pédagogique), Lyon.
Corblin, F. (1991). Sujet impersonnel et sujet indistinct : il et ça, Paper presented at the L’impersonnel, Mécanismes linguistiques et fonctionnements littéraires, Grenoble.
Corston-Oliver, S. (2003). Core arguments and the inversion of the nominal hierarchy in Roviana, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 273-300, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coveney, A. (2004). The alternation between l'on and on in spoken French, Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 91-112.
Craig, C. (1987). The Rama language: A text with grammatical notes, Journal of Chibchan Studies 5.
Creissels, D. (2004). Cours de Syntaxe de Sciences Du Langage, Université Lumière, Lyon 2.
Creissels, D. (2006a). Syntaxe générale une introduction typologique 1 : catégories et constructions, Vol. 1. Paris: Hermès - Lavoisier.
Creissels, D. (2006b). Syntaxe générale une introduction typologique 2 : la phrase, Vol. 2. Paris: Hermès - Lavoisier.
De Weck, G. (1991). La cohésion dans les textes d'enfants, étude du développement des processus anaphoriques, Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
De Weck, G. et Schneuwly, B. (1994). Anaphoric procedures in four text types written by children, Discourse Processes, 17, 101-113.
Demont, E. (2007). L'acquisition du langage, Psychologie Française, 52, 9-12.
Dockrell, J. et Messer, D. (2004). Lexical acquisition in the early school years, In Berman, R. (eds.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, Vol. 3. 35-52, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Downing, P. (1985). Classifier constructions and referential marking in Japanese, Paper presented at the Conference on Japenese Language and Linguistics, UCLA.
Du Bois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity, Language, 63, 805-855.
Du Bois, J. (2003). Argument Structure: Grammar in use, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11-60, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (2003a). Introduction, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 1-10, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L. et Ashby, W. (Eds.) (2003b). Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Duez, D. (1991). La pause dans la parole de l'homme politique, Paris: Edition du CNRS.
Duez, D. (2001). Caractéristiques acoustiques et phonétique des pauses remplies dans la conversation en français, Travaux Interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 20, 31-48.
Durie, M. (2003). New light on information pressure: Information conduits, “escape valves”, and role alignment stretching, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 159-196, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Durie, M. (1985). A grammar of Acehnese, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Dutra, R. (1987). The hybrid S category in Brazilian Portuguese: some implications for word order, Studies in Language, 11, 163-181.
England, N. (1983). Mamean voice : Syntactic and narrative considerations, University of Iowa.
England, N. et Martin, L. (2003). Issues in the comparative argument structure analysis in Mayan narratives, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 131-158, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Favart, M. (2005). Les marques de cohésion : leur rôle fonctionnel dans l'acquisition de la production écrite de texte, Psychologie française, 50, 305-322.
Favart, M. et Olive, T. (2005). Modèles et méthodes d'étude de la production écrite, Psychologie Française, 50, 273-285.
Favart, M. et Passerault, J. (1996). Functionnality of Cohesion devices in the management of Local and Global coherence: two studies in children’s written production of narratives, In Rijlaarsdam, R., Van den Berg, H., Jechle, T. (eds.), Theories, Models and Methodologies in Writing, 349–365, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Favart, M. et Coirier, P. (2006). Acquisition of the linearization process in text composition in third to ninth graders: effects of textual superstructure and macrostructural organization, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 305-328.
Fayol, M. (1984). La distanciation dans le langage, Enfance, 1, 5-19.
Fayol, M. (1985). Le récit et sa construction, une approche de psychologie cognitive, Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Fayol, M. (1987). Vers une psycholinguistique textuelle génétique, L'acquisition du récit, In Piéraut-Le Bonniec, G. (eds.), Connaître et le dire, 223-238, Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
Fayol, M. (1989). Une approche psycholinguistique de la ponctuation. Etude en production et en compréhension, Langue Française, 81, 21-39.
Fayol, M. (1990). La production de textes écrits, Introduction à l'approche cognitive, Education Permanente, 102, 21-30.
Fayol, M. (1991). Text typologies: a cognitive apparoach, In Denhière, G., Rossi, J. (eds.), Text and text processing, 61-76, Amsterdam : North-Holland.
Fayol, M. (1996). La production d'écrits narratifs : Approche de psycholinguistique textuelle chez l'enfant et l'adulte, In David, J., Plane, S. (eds.), L’apprentissage de l’écriture de l’école au collège, 9-36, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Fayol, M. (1997). Des idées au texte : psychologie cognitive de la production verbale orale et écrite, Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Fayol, M. (2000). Comprendre et produire des textes écrits : l'exemple du récit, In Kail, M., Fayol, M. (eds.), L'acquisition du langage, le langage en developpement au-delà de trois ans, 183-214, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Fayol, M. (2002). Conclusion, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 287-301, Paris: Lavoisier.
Fayol, M. (2002). Introduction, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 17-24, Paris: Lavoisier.
Fayol, M. (Eds.) (2002). Production du langage, Paris: Lavoisier.
Fayol, M. et Abdi, H. (1988). The influence of script structure on punctuation, CPC/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 269-279.
Fayol, M. et Abdi, H. (1990). Ponctuation et connecteurs : étude expérimentale de leur fonctionnement dans les paires de propositions, In Charolles, M., Fisher, S., Jayez, J. (eds.), Le discours, 167-180, Nancy: P.U.N.
Fayol, M., et Heurley, L. (1995). Des modèles de production du langage à l'étude du fonctionnement du scripteur, enfant et adulte, In Boyer, J.Y., Dionne, J.P. (eds.), La production de textes : vers un modèle d'enseignement de l'écriture, 17-48, Montréal: Logiques.
Fayol, M., Jisa, H. et Mazur-Palandre, A. (2007). A developmental study of referential cohesion, The first conference of the swedish association for language and cognition Lund.
Fayol, M., Jisa, H. et Mazur-Palandre, A. (2008). Information flow in written and spoken French: A developmental perspective, Writing Research Across Borders University of California, Santa Barbara.
Fayol, M. et Miret, A. (2005). Ecrire, orthographier et rédiger des textes, Psychologie Française, 50, 391-402.
Ferrand, L. (2002). Les modèles de la production de la parole, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 27-44, Paris: Lavoisier.
Ferreira, F. et Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language?, In Gernsbacher, M. (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 33-56, San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Flower, L. et Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing, College Composition and Communication, 32, 385-387.
Fodor, J. (1983/1986). La modularité de l'esprit, Essai sur lapsychologie des facultés, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way, Massachussetts: MIT.
Fodor, J. (2003). L'esprit, ça ne marche pas comme ça, Paris: Odile Jacob.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foulin, J.N. (1995). Pauses et débits : les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite, L'année Psychologique, 95, 483-504.
Foulin, J.N. (1998). To what extend does pause location predict pause duration in adults and children's writing, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 17, 601-620.
Foulin, J.N. et Fayol, M. (1988). Étude en temps réel de la production écrite chez des enfants de sept et huit ans, European Journal of Pychology of Education, 3, 461-475.
Fox, B. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora, Vol. 48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Francis, G. (1986). Anaphoric nouns, Vol. 11. English Language Research: University of Birmingham.
François, D. (1974). Français parlé. Analyse des unités phoniques et significatives d’un corpus recueilli dans la région parisienne, Paris: S.E.L.A.F.
Gaatone, D. (1991, 1991). Il y a impersonnel et impersonnel : sur les contraintes et les finalités de la construction impersonnelle, Paper presented at the L’impersonnel, Mécanismes linguistiques et fonctionnements littéraires, Grenoble.
Gadet, F. (1989). Le français ordinaire, Paris: Armand colin éditeur.
Gadet, F. (1996). Une distinction bien fragile : oral/écrit, TRANEL (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique), 25, 13-27.
Garrett, M. (1975). The analysis of sentence production, In Bower, G. (eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 133-177, New York: academic Press.
Garrett, M. (1982). Production of speech : Observation from normal and pathological use, In Ellis, A. (eds.), Normality and pathology in cognition functions, 19-76, London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. (1984). The organisation of processing structure for language production: Applications to aphasic speech, In Caplan, D., Lecours, A., Smith, A. (eds.), Biological Perspectives on Language, 172-193, Cambridge : MIT Press.
Garrett, M. (1988). Processes in language production, In Newmayer, J. (eds.), Language: Psychological and biological aspects, 69-95, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, M. (1980a). Levels of processing in sentence production, In Butterworth, B. (eds.), Language Production, Vol. 1, 117-220, New York : Academic Press.
Garrett, M. (1980b). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production, In Fromkin, V. (eds.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand, 263-271, New York: Academic Press.
Gathercole, S. et Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory and language, Hove, UK ; Hillsdale, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Gayraud, F. (2000). Le développement de la différenciation oral/écrit vu à travers le lexique, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière, Lyon 2.
Gayraud, F., Jisa, H. et Viguié, A. (1999). The development of syntactic packaging in French children’s written and spoken textes, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 169-181.
Gayraud, F., Jisa, H. et Viguié, A. (2001). Utilisation des outils cohésifs comme indice de sensibilité au registre : une étude développementale, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 14, 3-24.
Genetti, C. et Crain, L. (2003). Beyond Preferred Argument Structure: Sentences, pronouns, and given, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 197-224, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gernsbacher, M. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gernsbacher, M. (1994). Handbook of psycholinguistics, San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Gernsbacher, M. et Givón, T. (1995). Introduction, coherence as a mental entity, In Gernsbacher, M., Givón, T. (eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text, VII-X, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gernsbacher, M. et Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants ; the advantage of first mention, Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717.
Gineste, M.D. et Le Ny, J.F. (2002). Psychologie cognitive du langage, Paris: Dunod.
Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in text vs. Coherence in mind, In Gernsbacher, M., Givón, T. (eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text, 59-116, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goosse, A. (1991). Mélanges de grammaire et de lexicologie françaises, Leuven et Louvain-la-neuve: Peeters et Publications linguistiques de Louvain.
Goosse, A. (1993/2004). Le bon usage : grammaire française, Paris: De Boeck Duculot.
Graham, S., Harris, K. et Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–689.
Graham, S., Harris, K. et Kink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633.
Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation, Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177-98.
Gregory, M. et Carroll, S. (1978). Language and situation : language varieties and their social contexts , London/Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Guerin, E. (2006). Introduction de la notion de variation situatiolectale dans la grammaire scolaire par la caractérisation de deux opérateurs pragmatiques : on et ça, Paris X - Nanterre, Paris.
Guerreiro, S., Oshima-Takane, Y. et Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in english and japanese : a discourse-pragmatic perspective, Journal of child language, 33, 823-57.
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. (1989). Spoken and written language (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. et Hasan, R. (1976/1989). Cohesion in English, Londres: Longman group limited.
Halliday, M. et Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, Victoria: Deakin University.
Haviland, S. et Clark, H. (1974). What's New? Acquiring New Information as a Process in Comprehension, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13, 512-521.
Hawkins, P. (1973). Social class, tne nominal group and reference, In Bernstein, B. (eds.), Class, codes and control, Applied studies toward a sociology of language, 81-92, Londres: Routledge et Kegan Paul.
Hawkins, J. (1983). Word order universals, New York: Academic press.
Hayes, J. (1995). Un nouveau modèle du processus d'écriture, In Boyer, J.Y., Dionne, J.P. (eds.), La production de textes : vers un modèle d'enseignement de l'écriture, 49-72, Montréal: Logiques.
Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework or understanding cognition and affect in writing, In Levy, M., Ransdell, S. (eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual differences, 1–27, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, J. (1998). Un nouveau cadre pour intégrer cognition et affect dans la rédaction, In Piolat, A., Pélissier, A. (eds.), la rédaction de textes, 51-101, Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Hayes, J. et Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes, In Gregg, L., Steinberg, E. (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, 3-30, NJ : Hillsdale.
Hayes, J. et Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer, American psychologist, 41, 1106-1113.
Herslund, M. (2003). Article et pronom. Réflexions sur le syntagme nominal, In Hadermann, P., Van Slijcke, A., Berré, M. (eds.), La syntaxe raisonnée. Mélanges de linguistique générale et française offerts à Annie Boone à l’occasion de son 60e anniversaire, 105-116, Bruxelles: De Boeck et Larcier.
Hickmann, M. (1980). Creating referents in discourse: A developmental analysis of linguistic cohesion, In Kreiman, J., Ojeda, E. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on pronouns and Anaphora, 192-203, Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Hickmann, M. (1987). Ontogenèse de la cohésion dans le discours, In Piéraut-Le Bonniec, G. (eds.), Connaître et le dire, 239-262, Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
Hickmann, M. (1995). Discourse organisation and the development of reference to person, Space and time, In Fletcher, P., MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The Handbook of child language, 194-218, Oxford: Blackwell.
Hickmann, M. (2000). Le développement de l'organisation discursive, In Kail, M., Fayol, M. (eds.), L'acquisition du langage, le langage en developpement au-delà de trois ans, 83-115, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Hickmann, M. (2002). Développement de la production verbale orale, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 173-203, Paris: Lavoisier.
Hickmann, M. (2003). Children's discourse : person, space and time across languages, Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hickmann, M. (2004). Coherence, cohesion and context, Some comparative perspectives in narrative development, In Strömqvist, S., Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating events in narrative, Typological and contextual perspectives, 281-306, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hickmann, M. et Hendriks, H. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children's narratives : a comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese, Journal of Child Language, 26, 419-452.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F. et Liang, J. (1996). The marking of new information in children's narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese, Journal of child Languages, 23, 591-619.
Hickmann, M., Kail, M. et Roland, F. (1995a). Cohesive anaphoric relations in french children’s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge, First Language, 15, 277–300.
Hickmann, M., Kail, M. et Roland, F. (1995b). L'organisation réferentielle dans les récits d'enfants en fonction des contraintes contextuelles, Enfance, 2, 215-226.
Hoc, J.M. (1992). Psychologie cognitive de la planification, Grenoble: Presse Universitaire de Grenoble.
Hofling, C. (2003). Trackling the deer: Nominal reference, parallelism and preferred Argument Structure in Itzaj Maya narrative genres, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 131-158, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate, In Tannen, D. (eds.), Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, 117-34, Norwood : Ablex.
Hudelot, C. (1980). Qu’est-ce que la complexité syntaxique? L’exemple de la relative, La Linguistique, 16, 5-41.
Hughes, M., Allen, S. (2006). A discourse-pragmatic analysis of subject omission in child English, Paper presented at the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Hunt, K. (1970). Syntactic Maturity in School children and Adults, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, iii-67.
Hurell, L. (1956). A comparison of the development of oral and written language in school age children, Indiana: Purdue University, Lafayette.
Iwasaki, S. (1985, 1985). The “Given A Constraint” and the Japanese particle ga, Paper presented at the First Anual Pacific Linguistics Coference, University of Oregon.
Jeanjean, C. (1980). Les formes sujets de type nominal : étude sur le français contemporain, Université de Provence.
Jisa, H. (1998a). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative text, Journal of Child Language, 25, 623-652.
Jisa, H. (2000a). Development of subject ellipsis in French narrative discourse: reference in syntax, Linguistics, 38, 591-620.
Jisa, H. (2000b). Increasing cohesion in narratives: a developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects in French, Linguistics, 38, 591-620.
Jisa, H. (2004). Growing into academic French, Later Language Development: Typological and psycholinguistic Perspectives. TILAR, 3, 135-162.
Jisa, H. et Kern, S. (1998b). Relative clauses in French children's narrative texts, Journal of Child Language, 25, 623-652.
Jisa, H. et Mazur, A. (2005). The structure and content of noun phrases in French, Xth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Berlin.
Jisa, H. et Mazur, A. (2006). Les sujets lourds: considérations développementales en français oral et écrit, Méthodologies actuelles dans les recherches sur les acquisitions tardives en langue maternelle, Université René Descartes, Paris 5.
Jisa, H. et Mazur, A. (2006). L'expression de la causalité : une étude développementale, Paper presented at the Journée d'étude : Des savoirs savants aux savoirs enseignés, Université Paris X, Nanterre, 33-60.
Jisa, H., Reilly, J., Verhoeven, L., Baruch, E. et Rosado, E. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the use of passive constructions in written texts, Journal of Written Language and Literacy, 5, 163-181.
Jisa, H., Strömqvist, S. (2002). Pragmatique et acquisition tardives chez l'enfant : langage oral et langage écrit, In Bernicot, J., Trognon, A., Guichetti, M., Musiol, M. (eds.), La pragmatique : raisonnement, développement de l'enfant et pathologies, 257-265, Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Jisa, H. et Viguié, A. (2005). Developmental perspectives on the role of French on in written and spoken expository texts, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 125-142.
Johansson, V. (1999). Word frequencies in speech and Writing: a study of expository discourse, Genre and modality in developing discourse abilities, 1, 182-198.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science, Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, M. (1996). Foundations of French Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, D. et Christensen, C. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ability to generate written text, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49.
Just, M. et Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
Kail, M. et Fayol, M. (2000a). Introduction, In Kail, M., Fayol, M. (eds.), L'acquisition du langage, le langage en developpement au-delà de trois ans, 1-8, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Kail, M. et Fayol, M. (Eds.) (2000b). L'acquisition du langage, Le langage en développement au-delà de trois ans, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Kail, M. et Hickmann, M. (1992). French children’s hability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge, First Language, 12, 637-62.
Kail, M. et Hickmann, M. (1992). On French children's ability to introduce referents in discourse as function of mutual knowledge, First Language, 12, 73-94.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979a). A functional approach to language: a study of determiners and reference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979b). Micro- and Macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems, Cognitive science, 3, 91-118.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981a). Getting developmental differences or studying child development?, Cognition, 10, 151-158.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981b). The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production, In Deutsch, W. (eds.), The child’s construction of language, 121-147, New York: Academic Press.
Karmiloff Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). A constructivist approach to modelling linguistic and cognitive development, Archives de Psychologie, 53, 113-126.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data, Cognition, 23, 95-147.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraint on representational change: Evidence from children's drawing, Cognition, 34, 57-83.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993/1995). Beyond Modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Karmiloff, M. et Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2001). Pathways to language: from fetus to adolescent, Harvard University Press.
Katzenberger, I. (1999). Further ideas on (l)onger-Units, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 128-141.
Katzenberger, I. (2004). The development of clause packaging in spoken and written texts, Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1921-1948.
Katzenberger, I. (2005). The super-structure of written ewpository texts – a developmental perspective, In Ravid, D., Shyldkrot, H.B. (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, 327-336, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Keenan, E. et Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar, Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
Kellogg, R. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes, Memory and Cognition, 15, 256-266.
Kellogg, R. (1994). The psychology of writing, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kellogg, R. (1998). Un modèle de la mémoire de travail dans la rédaction, In Piolat, A., Pélissier, A. (eds.), La rédaction de textes, Approche cognitive, 102-135, Lausanne: Delachaux et niestlé.
Kellogg, R. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective, Journal of, 1, 1-26.
Kern, S. (1997). Comment les enfants jonglent avec les contraintes communicationnelles, discursives et linguistiques dans la production d'une narration, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière, Lyon.
Khorounjaia, E. et Tolchinsky, L. (2004). Discursive constraints on the lexical realization of arguments in Spanish, In Berman, R. (eds.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, Vol. 3, 83-110, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory, New York: Wiley and Sons.
Kociemba, V. (2004). Aider les élèves en difficulté, Enseigner en ZEP. Sous la direction de La Bordeire R., Paris: Bordas pédagogie.
Kohn, S. et Cragnolino, A. (2003). The role of Preferred Argument Structure for understanding aphasic sentence planning, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 339-352, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kumpf, L. (2003). Genre and Preferred Argument Structure: Sources of argument structure in classroom discourse, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure, Grammar as architecture for function, 109-130, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labov, W. (1976). Sociolinguistique, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Labov, W. (1978/1993). Le parler ordinaire, la langue dans les ghettos noirs des états-unis, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Labov, W. et Waletzsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience, In Helms, J. (eds.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12-44, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1987). On the Status of SVO Sentences in French Discourse, In Tomlin, R. (eds.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, 217-261, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus and mental representations of discourse referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Le Ny, J.F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Leeman-Bouix, D. (1994). Grammaire du verbe français, des formes au sens, Tours : Nathan Université.
Léger, A. (non publié). Le débat Bernstein/Labov : différences langagières ou inégalité, Université de Caen.
Lehmann, A. et Martin-Berthet, F. (2000). Introduction à la lexicologie, Sémantique et morphologie, Liège: Nathan Université.
Lemaire, P. (1999). Psychologie cognitive, Bruxelles: De boeck Université.
Leuwers, C. (2002). La production de phrases, In Fayol, M. (eds.), Production du langage, 107-130, Paris: Lavoisier.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge/Massachussetts: The MIT Press.
Levelt, W. (1995). The ability to speak: from intentions to spoken words, European Review, 3, 13-23.
Levelt, W. (1999). Producing spoken language: a blueprint of the speaker, In Brown, C., Hagoort, P. (eds.), The neurocognition of language, 94-122, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loban, W. (1976). Language Development : Kindergarten through Grade Twelve, National Council of Teachers of English, 18.
MacArthur, C., Graham, S. et Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of Writing Reasearch, New York: The Guilford Press.
Maggio, S. (2007). La dynamique de la production verbale écrite chez les enfants de 10 à 16 ans, Mémoire de Master, Université Blaise Pascal.
Maggio, S., Jisa, H., Lété, B. et Fayol, M. (2008). On managing spelling when writing texts, Writing Research Across Borders, Santa Barbara.
Maggio, S., Lété, B. et Fayol, M. (2008). On managing spelling when writing texts, Sig writing, Lund.
Maillard, M. (1985). L’impersonnel français de « il » à « ça », In Chocheyras, J. (eds.), Autour de l’impersonnel, 63-118, Grenoble: Ellug.
Mandler, J. (1982). Recent research on story grammars, In Le Ny, J. et Kintsch, W. (eds.), Language and comprehension, 207-219, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Martin, L. (2003). Narrator virtuosity and the strategic exploitation of Prefered Argument Structure in Mocho: Repetition and constructed speech in Mocho narrative, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 411-436, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: the tempo of written discours production, Research in the teaching of english, 15, 113-134.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. et Tomasello, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions, Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 403–422.
Matthey, M. (2003). Apprentissage d’une langue et interaction verbale, Bern: Peter lang SA.
Mazur, A. (2005). Etude developpementale de la complexité des syntagmes nominaux lexicaux en position sujet, Mémoire de DEA, Université Lumière, Lyon 2.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2007). Analyse syntaxique de textes produits dans différents contextes de production, Paper presented at the Colloque jeunes chercheurs de l'école doctorale "Langage et langues", "Normes, variations, identité et altérité", Institut de Linguistique et Phonétique Générale et Appliquée.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2007). Later language development: syntactic packaging in written and spoken French, Paper presented at the The Second Oxford Linguistics Postgraduate Conference, Oxford.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2007). Les connexions syntaxiques : considérations contextuelles et développementales, Paper presented at the Colloque jeunes chercheurs Praxiling Analyses du discours et contextes : quelles relations?, Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier III.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2008a). Le flux de l'information: une étude développementale, Dans le cadre des séminaires internes de DDL, Lyon.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2008b). Referential cohesion in written expository and narrative: A developmental study, Sigwriting 2008, The 11th international conference of the EARLI, social interest group on writing, Lund University.
McCutchen, D. (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children’s writing: A problem of metacognitive control, Written Communication, 5, 306-324.
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition, Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
McCutchen, D. (1998). Une théorie de la capacité pour la rédaction : La mémoire de travail dans la rédaction, In Piolat, A., Pélissier, A. (eds.), La rédaction de textes, Approche cognitive, 183-224, Lausanne: Delachaux et niestlé.
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing, Educational Psychologist, 35, 13-23.
Mishina-Mori, S. (2007). Argument representation in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Is there a transfer?, Paper presented at the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Moirand, S. (1975). Le rôle anaphorique de la nominalisation dans la presse écrite, Langue Française, 28, 60-78.
Monnier, C. (2008). La mémoire de travail : approche théorique et développement, Psychologie française, 53, 279-280.
Mosenthal, P. (1985). Defining the expository discourse continuum, toward a taxinomy of expository text, Poetics, 14, 387-414.
Mounin, G. (Eds.) (1974/2004). Dictionnaire de la linguistique, Paris: PUF.
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N. et Murty, L. (2005). Argument Realization in Hindi Caregiver-Child Discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 461-95.
Nichols, S., Jones, W., Roman, M., Wulfeck, B., Delis, D., Reilly, J. et Bellugi, U. (2004). Mechanisms of verbal memory impairment in four neurodevelopmental disorders, Brain and Language, 88, 180–189.
Nippold, M. (2002). Lexical learning in school-age children, adolescents, and adults: a process where language and literacy converge, Journal of Child Language, 29, 474-478.
Nippold, M. (2004). Research on later language development: International perspectives, In Berman, R. (eds.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, Vol. 3, 1-8, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjaminsn.
O'Donnell, R., Griffin, W. et Norris, R. (1967). Syntax of kindergarden and elementary school children : a transformational analysis, Illinois: National Counicil of Teachers of English.
Olive, T. (2004). Working Memory in Writing: Empirical Evidence From the Dual-Task Technique, European Psychologist, 9, 32-42.
Olive, T. et Piolat, A. (2003). Activation des processus rédactionnels et qualité des textes, Le Langage et l' Homme, XXXVIII.
Olive, T. et Piolat, A. (2005). Le rôle de la mémoire de travail dans la production de textes, Psychologie Française, 50, 373-390.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Routledge.
Paradis, J. et Navarro, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: what is the role of input?, Journal of Child Language , 30, 371-393.
Payne, D. (1987). Information structuring in Papago narative discourse, Language, 63, 783-804.
Pellegrini, A., Galda, L. et Rubin, D. (1984). Context in text: The development of oral and written language in two genres, Child Development, 55, 1549–1555.
Péry-Woodley, M.P. (1993). Les écrits dans l’apprentissage, Vanves: Hachette.
Peterson, C. et McCabe, A. (1982). Development Psycholinguistics: three ways of looking at a child’s narrative, New York: Plenum.
Piaget, J. (1923). Le langage et lapensée chez l'enfant, Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Piolat, A. (2004). Approche cognitive de l’activité rédactionnelle et de son acquisition. Le rôle de la mémoire de travail, LINX (Linguistique Institut Nanterre Paris X), 51, 55-74.
Piolat, A. et Fruttero, L. (1999). Effects of memory span on cognitive load and composing strategies related to writing processes, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Writing Conference, MSHS, Poitiers.
Piolat, A., Isnard, N. et Della-Valle, V. (1993). Traitement de texte et stratégies rédactionnelles, Le Travail Humain, 56, 79-99.
Piolat, A., Olive, T. et Kellogg, R. (2005). Cognitive effort of note taking, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291-312.
Piolat, A. et Pélissier, A. (Eds.) (1998). La rédaction des textes. Approche cognitive, Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Piolat, A. et Roussey, J.Y. (1992). Rédaction de textes. Eléments de psychologie cognitive, Langages, 106, 106-125.
Piolat, A., Roussey, J., Olive, T. et Amada, M. (2004). Processing time and cognitive effort in revision: effects of error type and of working memory capacity, In Allal, L., Chanquoy, L., Largy, P. (eds.), Revision. Cognitive and Instructional Processes, 21–38, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information, In Cole, P. (eds.), Radical Pragmatics, 223-56, NY: Academic Press.
Prince, E. (1992). The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status, In Thompson, S., Mann, W. (eds.), Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text, 295-325, Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ragnarsdottir, H. et Strömqvist, S. (2005). The development of generic maður/man for the construction of discourse stance in Icelandic and Swedish, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 143-155.
Ravid, D. (2000). NP complexity in the development of text writing, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 3, 163-170.
Ravid, D. (2002). Paper about NP analysis: conceptualization and methodological issues, Tel Aviv University.
Ravid, D. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in later language development:evidence from expository text construction, In Ravid, D., Shyldkrot, H.B. (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, 337-355, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ravid, D. (2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun Scale analyses, Journal of Child Language, 33, 791–821.
Ravid, D. et Berman, R. (1999). A clause-level analysis of 4th grade texts, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 208-219.
Ravid, D. et Berman, R. (sous press). Developing noun phrase complexity across adolescence: A text-embedded analysis, First Language.
Ravid, D. et Cahana-Amitay, D. (2005). Verbal and nominal expressions in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 157-183.
Ravid, D. et Katzenberger, I. (1999). Global text evaluation, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 220-223.
Ravid, R. et Shlesinger, Y. (1995). Factors in the selection of compound-types in spoken and written hebrew, language Sciences, 17, 147-179.
Ravid, D. et Shyldkrot, H.B. (Eds.) (2004). Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ravid, D. et Tolchinsky, L. (2000). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 3, 1-31.
Ravid, D. et Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model, Journal of Child Language, 29, 417-447.
Ravid, D., Van Hell, J., Rosado, E. et Zamora, A. (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production, Written Language and Literacy, 5, 69-94.
Ravid, D., Shyldkrot, H.B. et Berman, R. (2005). Perspectives on language and language development : essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, Dordrecht ; Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Reichler-Béguelin, M.J. (1989). Anaphores, connecteurs, et processus inférentiels, In Rubattel, C. (eds.), Modèles du discours. Recherches actuelles en Suisse romande, 303-336, Berne: Peter Lang.
Reichler-Béguelin, M.J. (1993). Anaphores associatives non lexicales: incomplétude macrosyntaxique? Complétude et incomplétude dans les langues romanes et slaves, Paper presented at the Actes du 6e Colloque international de Linguistique romane et slave (Septembre/Octobre 1991), Cracovie.
Reilly, J. et Bernicot, J. (2003). Que nous apprennent les développements atypiques sur l’acquisition du langage ?, Enfance, 55, 205-207.
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U. et Wulfeckd, B. (2004). Brain and Language 88 (2004) 163–166 ‘‘Frog, where are you?’’ Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome, Brain and Language, 88, 229–247.
Reilly, J., Weckerly, J. et Bates, E. (2003). Neuroplasticité et développement : morphosyntaxe chez des enfants atteints de lésions focales précoces, Enfance, 55, 209-222.
Reilly, J. et Wulfeck, B. (2004). Issues in plasticity and development: Language in atypical children, Brain and Language, 88, 163–166.
Reilly, J., Zamora, A. et McGivern, R. (2005). Acquiring perspective in English: the development of stance, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 185-208.
Reinhart, T. (1980). Conditions for text coherence, Poetics Today, 1, 161-180.
Rey, A. (1972). Usages, jugements et prescriptions linguistiques, Langue française, 16, 4-28.
Rey-Debove, J. (2001). De on à je vers le nom propre : des pronoms personnels en français, In Bogaards, P. (eds.), Quitte ou double sens, 279-304, Amsterdam / New York: Rodopi.
Riegel, M., Pellat, J.C. et Rioul, R. (1994/2002). Grammaire méthodique du français, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Salas, N., Tolchinsky, L., Mazur Palandre, A., Jisa, H. et Chenu, F. (2008). The effect of age, genre, and modality on Preferred Argument Structure in French and Spanish, 4th International Conference on Speech, Writing and Context (ICSWC) Querétaro, Mexico.
Salles, M. (2006). Cohésion-cohérence: accords et désaccords, Corela (revue électronique), Numéros Spéciaux Organisation des Textes et Cohérence des Discours.
Sampson, O. (1956). A study of speech development in children 18-30 months, British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXVI, 194-202.
Sanford, A. et Garrod, S. (1981a). Understanding written language, New York: Wiley.
Sanford, A. et Garrod, S. (1981b). Vers la construction d‘un modèle psychologique de la compréhension du langage écrit, Bulletin de psychologie, 35, 643-648.
Schilperoord, J. (1996). It's about time. Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Schneuwly, B. (1988). Le langage écrit chez l'enfant, Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Schneuwly, B. et Bronckart, J.P. (1986). Connexion et cohésion dans quatre types de textes d'enfants, Cahier de linguistique française, 7, 279-294.
Schneuwly, B., Rosat, M.C. et Dolz, J. (1989). Les organisateurs textuels dans 4 types de textes écrits. Étude chez des élèves de 10, 12 et 14 ans, Langue Française, 81, 40-58.
Schuetze-Coburn, S. (1987). Topic management and the lexicon: a discourse profile of three-argument verbs in German, Master thesis, Los Angelos.
Schober, M. et Clark, H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers, Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
Seigneuric, A., De Guibert, M., Megherbi, H., Potier, D. et Picard, A. (2008). La MTVE : une épreuve de mémoire de travail verbale chez l'enfant adaptée du Listening Span Task de Siegel et Ryan (1989), L'Année Psychologique, 108, 273-308.
Seigneuric, A. et Ehrlich, M.F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension : a longitudinal investigation, Reading and writing, 18, 617-656.
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.F., Oakill, J. et Yuill, N. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension, Reading and writing, 13, 81–103.
Seigneuric, A. et Megherbi, H. (2008). Capactié de mémoire de travail et traitement du pronom chez l'enfant, Psycholigie française, 53, 281-306.
Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian, Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 437-462.
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. et Paoli, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 7, 183-206.
Siegel, L. et Ryan, E. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes oflearning disabled children, child Development, 60, 973-980.
Skarabela, B. (2006). The role of social cognition in early syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization, Boston University, Doctoral dissertation.
Skarabela, B. (2007). Signs of early social cognition in children's syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut, Lingua, 117, 1837-1857.
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. (2002). Joint attention and argument realization in child Inuktitut, Paper presented at the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Smith, W. (1987). Preferred Argument Structure in spoken Hebrew discourse, Master thesis, Los Angeles.
Smith, W. (1996). Spoken narrative and preferred clause structure: evidence from modern Hebrew discourse, Studies in Language, 20, 163-89.
Stewart, A. (1984). A glance at Preferred Argument Structure in Conchucos Quechua, Master thesis, Los Angeles.
Strömqvist, S. (2000). A note on pauses in speech and in writting, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 3, 211-225.
Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H. et Wenglin, A. (2006). What key-logging can reveal about writing, In Sullivan, K., Lindgren, E. (eds.), Computer Key-stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications, 45-73, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Thal, D., Reilly, J., Seibert, L., Jeffries, R. et Fenson, J. (2004). Language development in children at risk for language impairment: Cross-population comparisons, Brain and Language, 88, 163–166.
Tijus, C. (2001). Introduction à la psychologie cognitive, comment la pensée et l’intelligence se construisent en interaction avec le monde, Paris: Nathan Université.
Tolchinsky, L. (2006). The emergence of writing, In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Fitzgerald, J. (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 83-95, New York: The Guilford Press.
Tolchinsky, L., Johansson, V. et Zamora, A. (2002). Text openings and closings: Textual autonomy and differentiation, Written Language and Literacy, 5, 219-254.
Tolchinsky, L., Perera, J., Argerich, N. et Aparici, M. (1999). Rhetorical moves and noun phrase complexity in written expository texts, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 1, 257-278.
Tolchinsky, L. et Rosado, E. (2005). The effect of literacy, text type, and modality on the use of grammatical means for agency alternation in Spanish, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 209-237.
Torrance, M. et Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing, In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Fitzgerald, J. (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 67-82, New York: The Guilford Press.
Traxler, M. et Gernsbacher, M. (1995). Improving coherence in written communication, In Gernsbacher, M., Givón, T. (eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text, 215-238, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tuaillon, G. (1983). Matériaux pour l’étude des régionalismes du français, Paris: Klincksieck.
Van Dijk, T. et Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension, New York: Academic Press.
Van Galen, G. (1990). Phonological and motoric demands in handwriting: Evidence dor discrete transmission of information, Acta Psychologica, 74, 259-75.
Van Hell, J., Verhoeven, L., Tak, M. et Van Oosterhout, M. (2005). To take a stance: a developmental study of the use of pronouns and passives in spoken and written narrative and expository texts in Dutch, Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 239-273.
Verdelhan-Bourgade, M. (2002). Le Français de Scolarisation pour une didactique réaliste, Paris : Presses Universitaire de France.
Viguié, A. et Jisa, H. (1999). Schooling in France, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 1, 291-298.
Viguié-Simon, A. (2001). Développement de la connectivité selon le type textuel et le mode de production au cours de l'adolescence, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière, Lyon.
Weber, E. (2003). Nominal information flow in the talk of two boys with autism, In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Prefered Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 353-384, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wigglesworth, G. (1991, 1991). Reference tracking strategies of young children in extended narrative discourse, Paper presented at the Working papers in Linguistics, La trobe University.
Wittek, A. et Tomassello, M. (2005). Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions, Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 541–558.
Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., Krupa-Kwiatkowski, M. et Saltzmanc, D. (2004). Grammaticality sensitivity in children with early focal brain injury and children with specific language impairment, Brain and Language, 88, 215-228.
Zammuner, V. (1986). Children’s coherence in discourse: A review, In Petöfi, J. (eds.), Text connectedness from psychological point of view, 24–63, Hamburg: Buske.
Zamora, A. et Kriz, S. (2000). Stance in written and spoken texts: a developmental study, Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages, 3, 31-42.
Zellner, B. (1994). Pauses and the temporal structure of speech, In Keller, E. (eds.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition, 41-62, Chichester: John Wiley.