Références Bibliographiques

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
2. Anderson, M.C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
3. Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C., (2000). Similarity and Inhibition in Long-Term memory: Evidence for a Two-Factor Theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141-1159.
4. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R.M., (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2(pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
5. Axmacher, N., Mormann, F., Fernandez, G., Elger, C.E & Fell, J. (2006). Memory formation by neural synchronization. Brain Research Reviews, 52(1), 170 – 182.
6. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8 (pp.47-89). New York: Academic Press
7. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
8. Barsalou, L.W., Yeh, W., Luka, B.J., Olseth, K.L., Mix, K.S., & Wu, L. (1993). Concepts and meaning. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, K.E. McCullough, S. Kita, & D. Testen (Eds.), Chicago Linguistics Society 29: Papers from the parasession on conceptual representations (pp. 23-61). University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
9. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E.,Argall, B. D., & Martin, A. (2004). Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41, 809-823.
10. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Adolphs, R., Rockland, C., & Damasio, A.R. (1995). Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science, 269, 1115-1118.
11. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigation dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
12. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press
13. Blanc, N., & Brouillet, D., (2003). Mémoire et comprehension. Paris: In Press Editions.
14. Brunel, L., Vallet, G., Oker, A., & Versace, R., (submitted). Implicit and explicit emergence of knowledge: Selective review and single system approach.
15. Bussey, T.J., & Saksida, L.M. (2007). Memory, Perception, and the Ventral Visual-Perirhinal-Hippocampal Stream: Thinking Outside of the boxes. Hippocampus, 17, 898 – 908.
16. Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1-47.
17. Calkins, M. W. (1896). Association: An essay analytic and experimental. Psychological Monographs, 1(2), 1-56.
18. Carbonnel, S. (2000). Les conceptions “système unique” de la mémoire: application à la neuropsychologie. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 10, 1.
19. Casanova, C., Merabet, L., Minville, K., & Desautels, A. (1999). Un nouveau rôle pour le thalamus ? Médecine/Sciences, 15, 1302-1304.
20. Chauvin, A., Hérault, J., Marendaz, C., & Peyrin, C. (2002). Natural scene perception: visual attractors and image processing. In W. Lowe & J. Bullinaria (Eds.), Connectionnist Models of Cognition and Perception (pp. 236-245): World Scientific Press.
21. Chiaramonte, C. (2007). Attraction de l'attention par des différences relatives de familiarité : Etude expérimentale de la dynamique des processus précoces. Thèse de Doctorat. Université Pierre Mendès France.
22. Clark, E. (1993). The Lexicon in acquisition. Combridge: Cambrigde Univ. Press.
23. Cohen, B. H. (1963). Recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 227-234.
24. Cohen, J., McWhinney, B., Flatt, M. & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.
25. Cohen, N.J., & Squire, L.R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210, 207-210.
26. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance, 6, 535-555. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
27. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
28. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-248.
29. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex. Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le Français écrit et parlé. Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
30. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163 - 191
31. Craik, F. I. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
32. Craik, F.I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
33. Crick, F. & Koch, C. (1990). Toward a neurobiological theory of Consciousness. Seminars in The Neurosciences, 2, 263 - 275.
34. Damas, L., Mille, A., Versace, R. (2002). Prendre en compte les comportements cognitifs des apprenants dans la conception de systèmes d'assistance à l'apprentissage. In Frasson C., Pécuchet J.-P. (Ed.), "Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication dans les Enseignements d'ingénieurs et dans l'industrie". Villeurbanne : Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon. 111-117.
35. Damasio, A.R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.
36. Damasio, A.R. (1995). L'erreur de Descartes. Paris : Odile Jacob.
37. Donchin, E., & Coles M.G.H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Brain Behavioral Science, 11, 357-74
38. Duncan-Johnson, CC, & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology; 14 : 456-67.
39. Dunlosky, J., Hunt, R. R., & Clark, E. (2000). Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 782-803.
40. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95, 91–101.
41. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic process: Theories, individual differences, and applications. (pp.78-102) New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New-York : Oxford University Press.
43. Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery and distorsion. Psychological Review, 104 (1), 148-169.
44. Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (eds.) Levels of processing in human memory (pp.89 N118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Fabiani, M. (2006). Multiple electrophysiological indices of distinctiveness. In Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.) Distinctiveness and memory. (pp. 339-361) New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1995). Encoding processes and memory organization: A model of the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 579-583.
47. Fabiani M., Gratton, G., Chiarenza, G. A., & Donchin, E. (1990). A psychophysiological investigation of the von Restorff paradigm in children. Journal of Psychophysiology, 4, 15-24.
48. Fabiani, M., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1986). P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm. Psychophysiology, 23, 298-308.
49. Fabiani, M., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1990). Effects of strategy manipulation in von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, 462-475.
50. Farah, M.J. (1995). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 963-975). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F.I.M. (1977). The interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 701-711.
52. Fortin, C., & Rousseau, R. (1989). Psychologie cognitive : Une approche de traitement de l'information. Sainte-Foy, Canada : Télé-université.
53. Gardiner, J.M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
54. Gardiner, J. M., & Conway, M. A. (1999). Levels of awareness and varieties of experience. In B. H. Challis & B. M. Velichovsky (Eds.), Stratification of consciousness and cognition (pp. 237-254). Amsterdam:John Benjamin.
55. Gardiner, J.M., & Hampton, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 495-504.
56. Gardiner, J.M., & Parkin, A.J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 579-583.
57. Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C. & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2002). Recognition memory and decision processes: a meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses. Memory, 10, 83-98.
58. Gardiner, J. M., Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Ramponi, C., (1998). Limitations of the signal detection model of the remember-Know paradigm: A reply to Hirshman.Consciousness and Cognition, 7(2), 285-288.
59. Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2002). The orthographiuc distinctiveness effect on direct and indirect tests of memory: Delineating the awereness and processing requirements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 495-504.
60. Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2004). The distinctiveness effect in the absence of conscious recollection: Evidence from conceptual priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 217–230.
61. Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2006). The distinctiveness effect in explicit and implicit memory. In Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.) Distinctiveness and memory. (pp. 211-339) New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Giard, M.H., & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans : A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 (5), 473-490.
63. Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
64. Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Stevenson, J. A., Kraus, T. A., Tkachuk, M. J., Gretz, A. L., Fish, J. H., & Turpin, B.M. (1980). A two-process account of long-term serial position effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 6, 355-369.
65. Glenberg, A. M., & Swanson, N. C. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 3-24.
66. Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65(2-3), 231-262.
67. Gopnik, A., & Melzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorisation in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments. Child Development, 58, 1523-1531.
68. Gottfried, J. A., Smith, A. P., Rugg, M. D., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Remembrance of odors past: Human olfactory cortex in cross-modal recognition memory. Neuron, 42, 687 - 695.
69. Gabrieli, J. D. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87-97.
70. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-518.
71. Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Googman-Wood, M. R., & DeSoto, M. C. (1998). Memory-driven processing in human medial occipital cortex: An event-related optical signal (EROS) study. Psychophysiology, 35, 348-351.
72. Green, R. T. (1956). Surprise as a factor in the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 340-344.
73. Hamilton, M., & Rajaram, S. (2001). The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 96-117.
74. Hamilton, M., & Rajaram, S. (2003). States of awereness across multiple memory tasks: Obtaining a “pure” measure of concscious recollection. Acta Psychologica, 112, 43-69.
75. Hayman, G. & Tulving, E. (1989). Is priming fragment completion based on the “traceless” memory system. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, memory & Cognition, 15, 941-956.
76. Hintzman, D.L. (1984). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528-551.
77. Hintzman, D.L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
78. Hintzman, D.L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109-139.
79. Hirshman, E.,Whelley, M.M., & Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Journal of memory and language, 28, 594-609.
80. Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 105–112.
81. Hunt, R.R., (2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.) Distinctiveness and memory. (pp. 3-25) New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G.O. (1981). Relational item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497-514.
83. Hunt, R. R., & Elliot, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
84. Hunt, R. R., & Mitchell, D. B. (1978). Specificity in nonsemantic orienting tasks and distinctive memory traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 121-135.
85. Hunt, R. R., & Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and non semantic distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 81-87.
86. Hunt, R. R., & Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 454-464.
87. Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (2006). Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Hupert, F A., Piercy, M. (1978). The role of trace strength in recency and frequency judgements by amnesic and control subjects. The quartely journal of experimental psychology, 30, 347-354.
89. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.
90. Jacoby, L. L. (1984). Incidental versus intentional retrieval: Remembering and awareness as separate issues. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.). Neuropsychology of memory (pp.145-156). Guilford, NY: Guilford Press.
91. Jacoby, L.L, Whitherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300-324.
92. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt and Company.
93. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition, Neuroimage, 14, 103-109.
94. Jenkins, W. O., & Postman, L. (1948). Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 214-221.
95. Jensen, O., Kaiser, J. & Lachaux, J.P. (2007). Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends in neurosciences, 30(7), 317-324
96. Jersild, A. (1929). Primacy, recency, frequency, and vividness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 58-70.
97. Johnson, M.K., & Hasher, L. (1987). Human Learning and Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 631-668
98. Karis, D., Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1984). “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 77-216.
99. Kelley, M.C., Jacoby L.L, & Hollingshead, A. (1989). Direct Versus Indirect Tests of Memory for Source: Judgments of Modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1101-1108
100. Kintsch, W. & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
101. Kirino, E., Belger, A., Goldman-Rakic, P., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Prefrontal activation evoked by infrequent target detection and novelty processing: An event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology, 38, 133-142.
102. Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256-259.
103. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747-1749.
104. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
105. Köhler, W., & von Restorff, H.(1935). Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld: Zur theorie der reproduktion. Psychologische Forschung, 19, 56-112.
106. Kolers, P. A. (1976). Reading a year later, Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning, and Memory, 2, 554-565.
107. Kolers, P. A. (1985). Skill in reading and memory, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 232-239.
108. Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425-449.
109. Labeye, E., Oker, A., Badard, G., & Versace, R., (2008). Activation and integration of motor components in a short-term priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 129,108-111.
110. Lecocq, P., & Tiberghien, G. (1981). Mémoire et Décision, Lille: Presses universitaire de Lille.
111. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
112. Leritz, E. C., Grande, L. J. & Bauer, R.M. (2006). Temporal lobe epilepsy as a model to understand human memory: the distinction between explicit and implicit memory. Epilepsy Behavior, 9, 1-13.
113. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX : A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 , 156-166.
114. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F.I.M, & Jacoby, L.L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recognition and Recall (pp.75-102). London:Wiley.
115. Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527
116. MacDonald, J. & McGurk, H. (1978). Visual influences on speech perception process. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 253-257
117. Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp.65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
118. Mandler, G. (1991).Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. In: E. William, E. Hockley & E. S. Lewandowsky (Eds.). Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 207–225), Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
119. Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587-604.
120. Mäntyla, T. (1986). Optimizing cuz effectiveness: recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 303-312.
121. Mäntyla, T., & Nilsson, L. G. (1983). Are my cues better than your cues? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 303-312.
122. Marchal, A. (2000). Étude de la distinctivité et de la saillance perceptives en mémoire. Thèse de doctorat. Université René Descartes, Paris.
123. Marchark, M., & Hunt, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 710-720.
124. Martin, A., Wiggs, C.L., Ungerleider, L.G., & Haxby, J.V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
125. McCarthy, G., Luby, M., Gore, J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1997). Infrequent events transientl activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measures by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 1630-1634.
126. McDaniel, M. A., Dunay, P. K., Lyman, B. J., & Kerwin, M.E. (1988). Effects of elaboration and relational distinctiveness on sentence memory. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 357-369.
127. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
128. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
129. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L. & Gentner, D. (1990). Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgements of similarity and difference are not inverses. Psychological Science, 1, 64-69.
130. Merabet, L., Desautels, A., Minville, K., & Casanova, C. (1998). Motion integration in a thalamic visual nucleus. Nature, 396, 265-268.
131. Metcalfe Eich, J. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
132. Metcalfe, J., Mencl, E. & Cottrell, G. (1992). Memory Systems, chapitre Cognitive binding, (pp 369-394) Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
133. Metcalfe, J. (1991). Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM. Psychological Review, 98, 529-553.
134. Michelon, P., & Snyder, Z. A., (2006). Neural correlates of incongruity. In Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.) Distinctiveness and memory. (pp. 361-381) New York: Oxford University Press.
135. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Level of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
136. Muhlenen, A., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture. Psychological Science, 16(12), 979-986.
137. Murdock, B. B., JR. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16-31.
138. N’Kaoua, B. (2003). Neuropsychologie et modélisation, Niveaux de traitement et production des mots. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherces. Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux.
139. Näätänen, R. (1985). Unconscious initiation of movements and brain physiology. Comment Article. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 8, 549.
140. Näätänen, R. (1986). Processing of the unattended message during selective dichotic listening. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 9 , 43-44.
141. Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997). Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 217-227.
142. Nairme, J. S., Neath, I., Serra, M., & Byun, E. (1997). Positional distinctiveness and the ratio rule in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 155-166.
143. Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition. Memory and Cognition, 21, 689-698.
144. Neath, I., & Crowder, R, G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 316-327.
145. Nicolas, S. (2000). La mémoire humaine. Une perspective fonctionnaliste.Paris: L’Harmattan.
146. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54-65.
147. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
148. Nosofsky, R. M. & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
149. Nothdurft, H. C. (1993b). The role of features in preattentive vision: comparison of orientation, motion, and color cue. Vision Research, 33, 1937-1958.
150. Nothdurft, H. C. (2000). Saliency from feature contrast: additivity across dimensions. Vision Research, 40, 1183-1201.
151. Nothdurft, H. (2006). Salience-controlled visual serach: Are the brightest and the least bright targets found by different processes? Visual Cognition, 13(6), 700-732.
152. Nyberg, L., Tulving, E. (1996). Classifying human long-term memory : Evidence from converging dissociations., The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 163-184.
153. Oker, A., Brunel, L., &Versace, R. (submitted). Levels of distinctiveness: Perceptual and conceptual nature of processing in implicit and explicit memory tasks.
154. Oker, A., & Versace, R., (in revision). Distinctiveness effect due to contextual information in a categorization task.
155. Oker, A., Versace, R., Ortiz, L., (in press). Spatial distinctiveness effect in categorization. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
156. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagerie and verbal processes. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
157. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 1043-1056.
158. Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, 54, 197-235.
159. Pecher, D., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1999). Priming effects for new associations in lexical decision and perceptual identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 593–614.
160. Pillsbury, W. B., & Raush, H. L. (1943). An extension of the Köhler-Restorff inhibition phenomenon. American Journal of Psychology, 56, 293-298.
161. Rabinowitz, F. M., & Andrews, S. R. (1973). Intentional and incidental learning in children and the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 315-318.
162. Rajaram, S. (1998). The effects of conceptual salience and perceptual distinctiveness on conscious recollection. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 5, 71-78.
163. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
164. Rodriguez, J. (2006). Étude de la compensation mnésique dans le cadre des niveaux de traitement: Approche expérimentale et modélisation. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux.
165. Roediger, H.L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol. 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
166. Roediger, H.L. (1984). Does current evidence from dissociation experiments favour episodic/semantic distinction? Behavior & Brain Science. 7, 252-254.
167. Roediger, H.L, Rajaram, S., & Srinivas, K. (1990). Specifying criteria for postulating memory systems. In A. Diamond (Ed.), The development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions. (pp. 572-595). New York: New York Academy of Sciences Press.
168. Roediger, H.L., Weldon, M.S., & Challis, B.H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H.L. Roediger & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving. (pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
169. Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
170. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
171. Rösler, F., Heil, M., & Henninghausen, E. (1995). Distinct cortical activation patterns during long-term memory retrieval of verbal, spatial, and color information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 51-65.
172. Roth, W. T., & Cannon, E.H. (1972). Some features of the auditory evoked response in schizophrenics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27, 466-471.
173. Rousset, S. (2000). Les conceptions "système unique" de la mémoire : aspects théoriques. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 10, 27-51.
174. Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2002). Is an ant larger than a lion ? Acta psychologica, 111, 141-154.
175. Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63-77.
176. Schacter, D.L., Bowers, J., & Booker J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In Lewandowsky, S., Dunn, J.C., Kirsner, K. (Eds). Implicit memory: Theoretical issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
177. Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523-542.
178. Schmidt, S. R. (1997). In search of paradoxical effects of arousal on memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November, Philadelphia, PA.
179. Schmidt, S. R. (2002). Outstanding memories: The positive and negative effects of nudes on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 353-361.
180. Shimamura, A. P. (1985). Problems with the finding of stochastic independence as evidence for independent cognitive processes, Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 23, 506-508.
181. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
182. Slotnick, S.D. (2004). Visual memory and visual perception recruit common neural substrates. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3, 207-221.
183. Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 431-446.
184. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. U. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory : A featural model for semantic decision. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
185. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129-169.
186. Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.
187. Squire, L. R., & Knowlton, B. J. (1995). Memory, Hippocampus, and brain systems. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 825-837). Cambridge: MIT Press.
188. Srinivas, K., Culp, D., & Rajaram, S. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 431-446.
189. Strange, B. A., Henson, R. N. A., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R.J. (2000). Brain mechanisms for detecting perceptual, semantic and emotional deviance. Neuroimage, 12, 425-433.
190. Stuss, D.T., & Alexander, M.P. (1999). Affectively burnt in: A proposed role of the right frontal lobe. In E. Tulving (Ed.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain : The Tallinn Conference (pp. 215-227). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
191. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J.E.R. (1965). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-8.
192. Tallon-baudry, C. & Bertrand, O. (1999).Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Neuroscience, 3(4), 151 - 162.
193. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A. & Tyler, L.K. (2006). Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 103, 8239-44.
194. Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
195. Theeuwes , J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
196. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 799-806.
197. Tiberghien, G. (1991). La simulation cognitive de la mémoire humaine. In J. Montangero & A. Tryphon (Eds), Psychologie génétique et sciences cognitives (p.113-123). Cahiers de la Fondation Archives Jean Piaget n°11. Genève: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget.
198. Tiberghien, G. (1997). La mémoire oubliée. Liège: Mardaga.
199. Tiberghien, G. & Lecocq, P. (1983). Rappel et reconnaissance. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
200. Treisman, A.M. (1988). Feature and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 210-237.
201. Treisman, A.M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
202. Treisman, A.M., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
203. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E., & Donaldson, W. Organization Memory (Eds). New York: Academic Press.
204. Tulving, E. (1984). Precis of elements of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 223-238.
205. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there ? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.
206. Tulving, E. (1995). Organizasion of memory : Quo vadis ? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839-847). Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
207. Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Reviews Pychology, 53, 1-25.
208. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5, 381-391
209. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
210. Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Dick, E., Bright, P., Fletcher, P., & Moss, H. (2003). Objects and their actions: Evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system. NeuroImage, 18, 542-557.
211. Vaidya, C.J., Zhao, M., Desmond, J.E., & Gabrieli, J.D. (2002). Evidence for cortical encoding spécificity in episodic memory : memory-induced re-activation of picture processing areas. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2136-43.
212. Van Burkirk, W. L. (1932). An experimental study of vividness in learning and retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 563-573.
213. Van Der Linden, M. & Bruyer, R. (1991). Neuropsychologie de la mémoire humaine. Grenoble : Presse Universitaire Grenoble.
214. Verleger, R., Bode, M., Arolt, V., Wascher, E., & Kömpf, D. (1994). Differences in P3 amplitudes between schizophrenics and healthy controls vary between the different events presented in a guessing task. Neuropsychobiology, 30, 114-23.
215. Versace, R., Labeye, E., Badard, G., & Rose, M. (2009). The content of the long term memory and the emergence of the knowledge. European journal of cognitive psychology, 21, 522-560.
216. Versace, R., Nevers, B., Padovan, C. (2002). La mémoire dans tous ses états. Marseille: Solal.
217. Von Restorff, H., (1933). Über die Virking von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologie Forschung, 18, 299-342.
218. Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
219. Weiskrantz, L., & Warrington, E.K. (1970). Verbal learning and retention by amnesic patients using spatial information. Psychonomic Science, 20(4), 210-211.
220. Weldon, M. S., & Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 670–686.
221. Whittlesea, B.W. A. (1987). Preservation of specific experiences in the representation of general knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 3-17.
222. Wollen, K.A. & Margres, M.G. (1987). Bizarreness and the imagery multiprocess model. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.) Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp.103-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
223. Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual simulation in property generation. (en révision)
224. Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Grounding concepts in perceptual simulation: Evidence from property generation. (soumis)
225. Yeh, W. & Barsalou, L.W. (2001). The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 1-59.
226. Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Langage, 46, 441 – 517.
227. Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J., Yaxley, R.H., & Aveyard, M.E. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension, Cognitive Science, 28, 611-61.
228. Zwaan, R.A., Stanfield, R.A., & Yuxley, R.H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13,168-171.
229. Zwaan, R.A., & Yaxley, R.H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic-relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 954-958.