Βιβλιογραφία

Ξενόγλωσση

  1. Abelson, R.P. and Carroll, J.D. (1965) Computer Simulation of Individual Belief Systems. The American Behavioral Scientist, 8(9), pp. 24-30.
  2. Abelson, R.P. (1973) The Structure of Belief Systems. In R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby, editors, Computer Models of Thought and Language, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
  3. Anderson, T. (2000) Text Categorization using lexical chains. Copenhagen University.
  4. Ando, R.K. (2000) Latent Semantic Space: Iterative Scaling Improves Inter-document Similarity Measurement. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2000.
  5. Ando, R.K., Boguraev, B.K., Byrd, R.J. and Neff, M.S. (2000) Multi-document Summarization by Visualizing Topical Content. In Proceedings of ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization.
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1935) Discourse in the Novel (translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist). In The Dialogic Imagination, M. Bakhtin, 259-422. Austin: University of Texas, 1981.
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1953) The problem of speech genres (translated by V. McGee). In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, M. Bakhtin, 60-102. Austin: University of Texas, 1986.
  8. Ballim, A. and Wilks, Y. (1991) Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Barthes. R. (1984) Mythologies, New York NY: Hill & Wang.
  10. Barthes, R. (1977) Image, Music, Text, New York NY: Hill & Wang.
  11. Barzilay, R. and Elhadad, M. (1997) Using Lexical Chains for Text Summarization In Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop (ISTS'97), ACL, Madrid, 1997.
  12. de Beer, C.S. (1996) Ontology of the Book: Text, Intertext, Hypertext, in South African Journal of Library and Information Science 15 (6): 124‐129.
  13. Borgman, C. (2003) From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  14. Boudon, R. (1986) L'idéologie ou l'origine des idées reçues, Paris: Fayard.
  15. Buckland, M.K. (1991) Information as Thing, in Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 (5): 351‐360.
  16. Camus, A. (1975) The Myth of Sisyphus, London: Penguin Books.
  17. Carbonell, J.G. (1981) Subjective Understanding: Computer Models of Belief Systems. UMI Press. Revision of author's PhD thesis, Yale, 1979.
  18. Carbonell, J.G. (1983) Learning by Analogy: Formulating and Generalizing Plans from Past Experience, in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J.G. and Mitchell, T.M. editors, volume 1: 137‐161.
  19. Choi, F.Y.Y., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Moore, J. (2001) Latent Semantic Analysis for Text Segmentation. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2001, pp 109-117.
  20. Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  21. CIDOC CRM - Conceptual Reference Model: http://www.cidoc-crm.org
  22. Cremmins, E.T. (1996) The Art of Abstracting, Arlington: Information Resources Press.
  23. Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M. editors (2004) Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model and Cross-reference Manual v4.0, ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group.
  24. DOLCE - Laboratory for Applied Ontology (2003): http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE.html
  25. Ducrot, O. and Todorov, T. (1979) Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  26. Dunham, M.H. (2003) Data Mining Introductory and Advanced Topics, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  27. Farrar, S. and Langendoen, D.T. (2003) A linguistic ontology for the Semantic Web. GLOT International. 7 (3), pp.97-100.
  28. Fergusson, R., Manser, M. and Pickering, D. (2002) The Penguin Concise Thesaurus, London: Penguin Reference.
  29. Fletcher, C.R. (1999) Computational Models of Reading and Understanding: What Good Are They? In Computational Models of Reading and Understanding, Ashwin Ram and Kenneth Moorman, (Eds.), The MIT Press.
  30. Foltz, P.W. (1998) Quantitative Approaches to Semantic knowledge Representations. Discourse Processes, 25, 127-130.
  31. Foltz, P.W. (1998) Textual Coherence Using Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25.
  32. Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., Landauer, T.K. (1998) The measurement of textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
  33. Geertz, C. (1988) Works and Lives: the anthropologist as author, Oxford: Polity Press.
  34. Gellner, E. (1985) Culture, Identity and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Goatly, A. (2007) Washing the Brain: metaphor and hidden ideology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  37. GOLD - General Ontology for Linguistic Description: http://linguistics-ontology.org
  38. Goldman, S.R. and Varma, S. (1995) CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  39. Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L. (1986) Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3), pp. 175-204.
  40. Haiman, J. (1998) Talk is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. Oxford University Press.
  41. Harris, L., Kiernan, V.G. and Miliband, R. (1991) A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  42. Hearst, M.A. (1994) Multi-Paragraph Segmentation of Expository Text. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, NM.
  43. Herman, E.S. and Chomsky, N. (1994) Manufacturing Consent: the political economy of the mass media, London: Vintage Books.
  44. Hirshman, A.O. (1991) The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, and Jeopardy. Harvard University Press.
  45. Hobbs, J.R. (1979) Coherence and Coreference. Cognitive Science 3(1), pp. 67-90.
  46. Hobsbawm, E.J. (1990) Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Hodge, B., Kress, G., Jones, G. (1979) The ideology of middle management. In Language and Control, Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunter Kress, and Tony Trew (eds.). London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
  48. Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction, London: Routledge.
  49. Hofmann, T. (1999) Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing. In Proceedings of SIGIR 1999, pp 50-57.
  50. Hovy, E.H. (1988) Generating Natural Language Under Pragmatic Constraints. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  51. Hroch, M. (1993) From national movement to the fully-fledged nation, in New Left Review, 198: 3-20.
  52. Institute for Propaganda Analysis (1939) The Fine Art of Propaganda, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  53. Kedourie, E. (1960) Nationalism, London: Blackwell Publishing.
  54. Kintsch, W. and Van Dijk, T.A. (1978) Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production, in Psychological Review 85 (5): 363‐394.
  55. Kintsch, W. (1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95: 163-82.
  56. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., Zimmy, S. (1990) Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 29:133-59.
  57. Kintsch, W. (1992) How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, and R. M. Schiffin, (Eds.), Essays in Honor of William K. Estes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  58. Kintsch, W. (1994) The Psychology of Discourse Processing. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 721-739.
  59. Lallich-Boidin, G. and Maret, D. (2005) Recherche d'information et traitement de la langue, Villeurbanne: Presses de l'ENSSIB.
  60. Landauer, T.K. (1999) Latent Semantic Analysis is a Theory of the Psychology of Language and Mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303-310.
  61. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D. (1998) Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
  62. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., Rehder, B., Schreiner, M.E. (1997) How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and humans. In M.G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412-417). Mawhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  63. Langston, M.C., Trabasso, T., Magliano, J.P. (1999) A Connectionist Model of Narrative Comprehension. In Computational Models of Reading and Understanding, Ashwin Ram and Kenneth Moorman, (Eds.), The MIT Press.
  64. Leggitt, J.S., Gibbs, R.W. Jr. (2000) Emotional Reactions to Verbal Irony. Discourse Processes, 29(1), pp. 1-24.
  65. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1964) Mythologiques en 4 volumes, Paris: Plon.
  66. Lowenthal, D. (1985) The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Mani, I. (2001) Automatic Summarization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  68. Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S. (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text 8, pp. 243-281.
  69. Marcu, D. (1996) Building Up Rhetorical Structure Trees. The Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol 2, pages 1069-1074, Portland, Oregon, August 1996.
  70. Marcu, D. (2000) Extending a Formal and Computational Model of Rhetorical Structure Theory with Intentional Structures a la Grosz and Sidner. The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING'2000, Luxembourg, July 31-August 4, 2000.
  71. Martin, O. (2007) L'enquête et ses méthodes: l'analyse de données quantitatives, Paris: Armand Colin.
  72. Marxists Internet Archive (2005): http://www.marxists.org
  73. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A. and Schneider, L. (2003) The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies, ISTC-CNR Preliminary Report.
  74. Meehan, J.R. (1980) The Metanovel: Writing Stories by Computer. Garland. Originally printed as author's thesis, Yale, 1976.
  75. Moore, J.D. and Pollack, M.E. (1992) A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-Level Discourse Analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, pp. 537-544.
  76. Morris, J. and Hirst, G. (1991) Lexical Cohesion Computed by Thesaural Relations as an Indicator of the Structure. Computational Linguistics,Volume 17, number 1, 1991, pp 21-48
  77. Moser, M.G. and Moore, J.D. (1996) Toward a Synthesis of Two Accounts of Discourse Structure, Computational Linguistics 22(3):409-420, 1996.
  78. Mross, E.F. and Roberts, J.O. (1992) The construction-integration model: A program and manual. Institute of Cognitive Science Technical Report, #92-14.
  79. Nirenburg, S. and Raskin, V. (2004) Ontological Semantics, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  80. Perfetti, C.A. (1998) The Limits of Co-Occurrence: Tools and Theories in Language Research. Discourse Processes, 25, 363-377.
  81. Propp, V. (1968) Morphology of the Folktale, Austin: University of Texas Press.
  82. Renan, E. (1947) Oeuvres Completes: volume I, Paris: Calmann-Livy.
  83. Ricoeur, P. (2004) Memory, History, Forgetting, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  84. Riesbeck, C. and Schank, R. (1989) Inside Case‐based Reasoning, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  85. Riloff, E. (1996) Automatically Generating Extraction Patterns from Untagged Text. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pp. 1044-1049.
  86. Sack, W. (1994) Actor-Role Analysis: Ideology, Point of View, and the News. Masters Thesis, MIT.
  87. Sack, W. (1994) On the Computation of Point of View. In Proceedings of the National Conference of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 94), Seattle, WA.
  88. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  89. Sévilla, J. (2003) Historiquement correct, Paris: Perrin.
  90. Sidanius, J. and Pratto, F. (1999) Social Dominance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  91. Sidiropoulou, M. (2004) Linguistic Identities through Translation, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  92. Silverstein, M. (1988) De-voice of authority. Paper read at 87th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Society, Phoenix, Arizona.
  93. Silverstein, M. (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language, J. Lucy (ed.). New York: Cambridge University.
  94. Tapiero, I. and Denhiere, G. (1995). Simulating recall and recognition by using Kintsch's Construction-Integration model. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes & R. C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Models of processing revisited. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 211-233). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  95. Toolan, M. (1988) Narrative: a critical linguistic introduction, London: Routledge.
  96. Uspensky, B. (1973) A Poetics of Composition (translated by V. Zavarin and S. Wittig). University of California Press.
  97. van Dijk, T. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  98. van Dijk, T. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
  99. van Dijk, T. (2000) Ideology and discourse. A multidisciplinary introduction. English version of an internet course for the UOC. http://www.hum.uva.nl/teun/ideo-dis2.htm
  100. Wang, S. (1993) The New York Times' and Renmin Ribao's News Coverage of the 1991 Soviet Coup: A case Study of International News Discourse. Text 13(4), pp. 559-589.
  101. Wertsch, J.V. (1998) Mind as Action, New York NY: Oxford University Press.
  102. Whitney, P. (1998) The Psychology of Language. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  103. Wortham, S., Locher, M. (1996) Voicing on the News: An Analytic Technique for Studying Media Bias. Text 16(4), pp. 557-585.
  104. Yang, Y. (1999) An Evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Journal of Information Retrieval, Vol 1, No. 1/2, pp 67-88.
  105. Žižek, S. (1994) Mapping Ideology, London: Verso.