References bibliographiques

1. Albrecht, J. E.,& O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(5), 1061-1070.
2. Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A,427-440.
3. Baddeley, A. D.(1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D.(Ed). (1993). Working memory and conscious awareness. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 11-28). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
5. Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In G.H Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol 8. London: Academic Press.
6. Black, J. B., Turner, T. J., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 187-198.
7. Blanc, N. (1999). Représentations mentales spatiales: Vers une définition des conditions les plus favorables à l’apprentissage d’un environnement. In V. Dufour (Ed.), Le Cahier des Jeunes Chercheurs en Psychologie, Dunod: Paris.
8. Blanc, N., & Tapiero, I. (2000). Mode de présentation et organisation de l’information dans l’acquisition de connaissances spatiales. L’Année Psychologique, 100, 241-264.
9. Blanc, N., & Tapiero, I. (2001). Updating a situation model: Effects of prior knowledge and task demands. Discourse Processes, 31 (3), 241-262.
10. Bower, G. H. (1989). Mental models in text understanding. In A. F. Bennett & K. M. McConkey (Eds.), Cognition in individual and social contexts (pp. 129-144). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
12. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
13. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7, 56-60.
14. Carreiras, M. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 124-129.
15. Cohen, J., Mac Winney, B., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
16. Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
17. De Beni, R. & Palladino, P. (2000). Intrusion errors in working memory tasks: Are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 12(2), 131-143.
18. Deaton, J. A., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Causal conjunctions and implicit causality cue mapping in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language.
19. Debruille, J.B. (2007). The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition. Brain research reviews, 56: 472-477.
20. Dell, G., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent information during reading the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 121-132.
21. Denis, M.& de Vega M., (1993), Modèles mentaux et imagerie mentale, Ehrlich M. F. (éd.), Les modèles mentaux. Approche cognitive des représentations, Paris, Masson.
22. Denis, M., & Cocude, M. (1989). Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 293-307.
23. Denis, M., & Cocude, M. (1992). Structural properties of visual images constructed from poorly or well-structured descriptions. Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 497-506.
24. Desmette, D., Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M-A., et Van der Linden, M. (1995). Adaptation française du « Reading Span Test » de Danemen et Carpenter (1980), L’Année Psychologique, 95, 459-482.
25. de Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(2), 373-385.
26. de Vega, M. & Rodrigo, M.J. (1997).Topological representations in learning and reading spatial descriptions. In M. Denis (Ed.). Langage et cognition spatial. Paris: Masson.
27. Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296-306.
28. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211-245.
29. Faust, M.E., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1996). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and language, 53: 234-259.
30. Ferguson, E. L., & Hegarty, M. (1994). Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 455-473.
31. Fischer, B., & Glanzer, M. (1986). Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 431-460.
32. Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63-76.
33. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1989). Discourse models asinterfaces between language and the spatial world. Journal of Semantics, 6, 147-160.
35. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1990). Referential processes during reading: Focusing on role of individuals. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp.465-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Gathercole S, Baddeley AD. (1989). Evaluation of the role of the phonological STM in the development of vocabularyin children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 200-13.
37. Gathercole, S.E. & Pickering, S.J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six- and seven-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 377-390.
38. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Cross-disciplinary approaches to language processing. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 82-88). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
39. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mecanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99-156.
40. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). The structure building framework : What it is, what it might also be, and why, in B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of text understanding (pp. 289-311), Hillsdale N. J. : Erlbaum.
42. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J.Costermans, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
43. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building framework, Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
44. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1991). The role of suppression in sentence comprehension. In G.B. Simpson (Ed), Understanding word and sentence, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland).
45. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: a component of general comprehension skill. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory and cognition, 17 (2), 245-262.
46. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1996). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 53, 234-259.
47. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givon, T. (Eds.). (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins.
48. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants : The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717.
49. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R.R.W. (1999).The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1619-1630.
50. Glanzer, M., Dorfman, D., & Kaplan, B. (1981). Short-term storage in the processing of text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 656-670.
51. Glanzer, M., Fischer, B., & Dorfman, D. (1984). Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 467-486.
52. Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and langage, 31, 129-151.
53. Givòn, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5-55.
54. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83.
55. Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
56. Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H. (Eds.). (1990). Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego. CA: Academic Press.
57. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 3, 371-395.
58. Graesser, A. C., & Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Inference generation and the construction of situation models. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Strategies and processing revisited (pp. 117-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Gray-Wilson, S. (1990). Characterizing mental representation created during narrative comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashvill, TN.
60. Gray-Wilson, S., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 141-154.
61. Haberlandt, K., & Bingham, G. (1978). Verbs contribute to the coherence of brief narratives : Reading related and unrelated sentence triples. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 419-425.
62. Haenggi, D., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Bolliger, C. M. (1994). Individual inferences in situation based inferencing during narrative text comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 79-96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Haenggi, D., Kintsch, W., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Spatial situation models and text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 19, 173-199.
64. Hamm, V. P. & Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inference. Psychology and aging. 7, 56-64.
65. Hasher, L. & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review anda new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 22,pp.193-225). New York: Academic Press.
66. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new ? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
67. Huitema, J. S., Dopkins, S., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. L. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(5), 1053-1060.
68. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models : towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension', Psychological Review 87(4), 329-354.
70. Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
71. Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of know in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95, 163-182.
72. Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol.2, pp. 261-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
74. Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readibility in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, N. J. : Erlbaum.
75. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
76. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence of studies from image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
77. Kruley, P., Sciama, S.C., & Glenberg, A.M. (1994). On-line processing of textual illustrations
78. in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory and Cognition, 22, 261-272.
79. Light, L., & Albertson, S. (1988). Comprehension of pragmatic implications in young and older adults. In L. Light & D. Burke (Eds.), Language, memory and aging (pp. 133-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale (USA), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16, 35-53.
82. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., Langston, M. C. (1995). Cohesion and coherence in sentence and story understanding.
83. Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 219-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..
84. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668-682.
85. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
86. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
87. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W . (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, backgroung knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.
88. Meyer, B. J. F. (1984). Text dimensions and cognitive processing. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and understanding texts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Minsky, M. A. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York : McGraw-Hill.
90. Morrow, D. M. (1985). Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 304-319.
91. Morrow, D. M., Bower, G., & Greenspan, S. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292-312.
92. Morrow, D., Greenspan, S., & Bower, G. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165-187.
93. Myers, J. L. (1990). Causal reladness and text comprehension. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp.361-375). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
94. Myers, J.L., & O’Brien, E.J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2&3), 131-157.
95. Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., & Mason, R. A. (1994). Maintening global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 876-886.
96. Norman, D. A. and Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E., and Shapiro, D., editors, Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory. Plenum Press.
97. O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 777-784.
98. Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failure to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229-235.
99. Otten, M. & Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2007). What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Brain Research, 1153, 166-177.
100. Pynte, J., & Denhière, G. (1982). Influence de la thématisation et du statut syntaxique des propositions sur le traitement de récits. L’Année Psychologique, 82, 101-129.
101. Radvansky, G. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (1998). Situation models. University of Notre Dame.
102. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403-417.
103. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 110-131.
104. Rinck, M., Williams, P., Bower, G. H., & Becker, E. S. (1996). Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: some generalizations and extensions. Discourse Processes, 21, 23-55.
105. Rumelhart, D., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring : Three modes of learning. In J.W. Cottin, & R. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
106. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations in comprehension beyond the sentence. New York: Wiley
107. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26(2&3), 159-190.
108. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
109. Seigneuric, A., Gyselink, V. & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2001). La mémoire de travail dans la compréhension du langage : quel système pour quelles fonctions ? InS. Majerus, M. Van der Linden, & C. Belin (Eds.), Les relations entre perception, mémoire de travail, et mémoire à long terme. Marseille: Solal.
110. Sharkey, A. J. C., & Sharkey, N. E. (1992). Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 543-572.
111. Siegel, L. S., Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, vol. 60, p. 973-980.
112. Singer, M. (1980). The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages. Discourse Processes, 3, 185-201.
113. Stevenson R. J. (1986). The time course of pronoun comprehension. Paper presented at The Eighth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, Ma.
114. Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1985). The search after meaning: Comprehension and comprehension monitoring. In F. J. Morrison, C. Lord, & D. Keating (Eds.), Applied developmental psychology ( Vol. 2, pp. 33-58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
115. Suh, S. Y., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
116. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 262-292.
117. Tapiero, I. (2000). The construction and the updating of a spatial mental model from text and map: Effect of imagery and anchors. In J. F. Rouet, J. Levonen & A. Biardeau (Eds.), Using Complex Information Systems, Elsevier Science.
118. Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: toward a definition of comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Tapiero, I., & Blanc, N. (2001). Vers la prise en compte de la caractéristique multidimensionnelle des représentations mentales construites à partir de textes narratifs : Apports théoriques, empiriques et questions. L’année psychologique, 101, 655-682.
120. Tapiero, I., & Denhière, G. (1995). Simulating recall and recognition by using Kintsch's construction-integration model. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes & C. R. Fletcher (Eds), Discourse Compréhension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 211-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
121. Tapiero, I., & Denhière, G. (1997). Contribution des différents niveaux de représentation à l'élaboration de la représentation finale : Expérimentations et simulations. Revue Internationale de systèmique, vol. 11(1), 69-93.
122. Tapiero, I., & Otero, J. (1999). Distinguishing between textbase and situation model in the processing of inconsistent information: Elaboration versus tagging. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 341-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Tapiero, I., & Renau Op’t’hoog, C. (2007) L’inhibition comme condition pour construire une représentation mentale spatiale cohérente : Influence de la dimension spatiale et de la mémoire de travail. In G. A. Michael, (Eds.), Les dimensions de l’attention. Marseille : Solal.
124. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. Y. (1993). Using talk-aloud protocols to reveal inferences during comprehension of text. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
125. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
126. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
127. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2008). Understanding sentences in context. What brain waves can tell us. Current directions in psychological science, 17 (6): 376-380.
128. Van Berkum, J.J.A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse : evidence from the N400. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 11 (6): 657-671.
129. van den Broek, P. (1990). Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 175-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
130. van den Broek, S., & Lorch, R. F. (1993). Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: Evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Processes, 16, 75-98.
131. van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
132. van Oostendorp, H. (1996). Updating situation models derived from newspaper articles. Medien Psychologie, 8, 21-33.
133. Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (1994). Directed ignoring. Inhibitory regulation of workingmemory. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
134. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(5), 1196-1207.
135. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C. & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6 (5), 292-297.
136. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P. & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21 (2), 386-397.
137. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky ,G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 162-185.
138. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 199-220.
139. Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse processes, 16, 125-143.
140. Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1994). Spatial information and naturalistic story comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp, & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 97-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.